Judge Patricia Gifford allegedly excluded pivotal eyewitness testimony in Mike Tyson rape trial

Summary

Judge Patricia Gifford allegedly excluded pivotal eyewitness testimony in Mike Tyson rape trial The passage alleges judicial misconduct that may have affected the outcome of a high‑profile criminal case involving a famous athlete. While it names specific actors (Mike Tyson, Desiree Washington, Judge Patricia Gifford) and describes concrete procedural actions (exclusion of three eyewitnesses, denial of rape‑shield evidence), the claims are unverified and pertain to a state trial already concluded. The lead is moderately useful for investigating potential judicial bias or misconduct, but lacks fresh financial or foreign‑policy angles and the alleged misconduct is not widely reported. Key insights: Three eyewitnesses claimed Tyson and Washington were "necking" before alleged rape.; Judge Patricia Gifford barred the witnesses, citing late disclosure despite their timely appearance.; The judge also excluded evidence that could suggest Washington had motive to frame Tyson.