Allegations of Judicial Misconduct in Mike Tyson Rape Trial

Summary

Allegations of Judicial Misconduct in Mike Tyson Rape Trial The passage describes alleged bias and procedural improprieties by Indiana Judge Gifford in the Tyson rape case, suggesting possible judicial misconduct and selective judge assignment. While it raises concerns about due process, it involves a single state judge and a celebrity defendant, offering limited actionable leads beyond filing complaints or appeals, and contains no new financial or political connections. Key insights: Judge Gifford allegedly selected by prosecutor due to Indiana law allowing such choice.; Accused of excluding key witnesses and labeling appellate issues frivolous.; Alleged media lobbying and personal pressure on appellate judges to prevent reversal.