Skip to main content
Skip to content

Duplicate Document

This document appears to be a copy. The original version is:

Personal relationship narrative with no apparent political or financial implications
Case File
kaggle-ho-018628House Oversight

Personal relationship narrative with no apparent political or financial implications

Personal relationship narrative with no apparent political or financial implications The text is a private, interpersonal account lacking any mention of influential actors, financial transactions, or misconduct of public relevance. It offers no actionable investigative leads. Key insights: Describes a breakup and ambiguous post‑breakup communications.; Mentions individuals referred to as "Mr. Ambition" and "Richard".; No references to public officials, corporations, or government agencies.

Date
Unknown
Source
House Oversight
Reference
kaggle-ho-018628
Pages
1
Persons
2
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

Personal relationship narrative with no apparent political or financial implications The text is a private, interpersonal account lacking any mention of influential actors, financial transactions, or misconduct of public relevance. It offers no actionable investigative leads. Key insights: Describes a breakup and ambiguous post‑breakup communications.; Mentions individuals referred to as "Mr. Ambition" and "Richard".; No references to public officials, corporations, or government agencies.

Tags

kagglehouse-oversightpersonalrelationshipnon‑political

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit
Review This Document

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
already do." Even as I said it, I wondered why I was still talking to a guy who'd just said that men don't want to date women as smart as they are. | felt like a bad feminist. "Oh, you shouldn't tone yourself down!" said Mr. Ambition. "It makes you attractive... Attractive intellectually, I mean." I sighed. "Yes," I said. "Intellectually.” "I'm sorry,” he said again. "I'm going home," I said. "We're still friends, right?” he asked. "Yes, but give me some time to get over this," I said. "Probably about a month.” "What do you mean?" He came after me as I walked to the door. "Like, you don't want to see me at all for a month? You don't want me to call you, or reach out to you, or anything?" I looked at him, again, for a long moment. I regretted his stricken expression. Again, I spoke as gently as I could. "Maybe in a month." He offered me a ride, which I declined. My fifteen-minute estimate was almost on target: twenty minutes later, I stepped into my bedroom, leaned back against my door and burst into tears. te Kk ok I ran into Richard the next evening, and we spent the night together. Richard put a fair amount of effort into convincing me to talk to Mr. Ambition. "It sounds like he didn't actually mean to break up with you," said Richard. "It sounds like the conversation got away from him. He didn't start that conversation intending to break up with you; maybe he was looking for reassurance, and you approached his questions too logically, and he concluded that you don't care. You really like him. It seems like it's worth trying to make it work." You may have noticed that both of these men tried hard to convince me that the other man cared about me. I decline to analyze what that means about me and my current approach to relationships. However, I will say that I tried giving Richard more emotional feedback than I have in a long time; I even told him I missed him the next time he went on vacation. And I did try talking to Mr. Ambition again, and he acknowledged that he hadn't exactly intended to break up with me. But then Mr. Ambition and I had several of those encounters that I think of as "post- breakup talks." I hate that shit. Every evening ended on a confusing, inconclusive note. He kept saying that he was "confidently ambiguous." We weren't dating, we weren't not dating. It reminded me of a phase I went through with a college ex-boyfriend, back in my monogamous days: my ex and I spent several weeks post-breakup being "exclusive but not together." So preposterous. People are so broken.

Related Documents (6)

House OversightUnknown

President Trump discusses Bob Woodward interview on phone, claims staff ignorance

President Trump discusses Bob Woodward interview on phone, claims staff ignorance The passage provides a brief anecdote of Trump’s phone call with journalist Bob Woodward, noting a claim that White House staff failed to inform him of the interview request. While it mentions a high‑profile figure (President Trump) and a senior aide (Kellyanne Conway), it lacks concrete details about wrongdoing, financial flows, or actionable leads. The information is already publicly reported and offers little novel investigative value. Key insights: Trump claims his staff did not tell him Woodward wanted an interview.; Kellyanne Conway is referenced as having asked Trump about a call.; Trump characterizes Woodward as "always been fair" but later calls the book inaccurate.

1p
House OversightUnknown

Internal Labor Party Power Struggle Over Peres’ Role as Party President

Internal Labor Party Power Struggle Over Peres’ Role as Party President The passage describes internal dynamics within Israel's Labor Party, focusing on Shimon Peres and internal votes for a ceremonial party presidency. While it provides vivid detail of personal tensions, it lacks concrete allegations, financial flows, or links to high‑level officials beyond party figures, offering limited investigative value. Key insights: Shimon Peres considered a ceremonial party president role amid leadership transition.; Party secretary‑general Nissim Zvili proposed the motion.; Peres faced vocal opposition from delegates questioning his motives.

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Bill Siegel email chain discussing 'The Control Factor' and anti‑Islamic conspiracy narrative

The passage is an internal email and interview transcript promoting a conspiratorial worldview about 'Islamic Enemy' and 'Civilization Jihad.' It mentions Jeffrey Epstein as a sender but provides no c Email originates from Jeffrey Epstein's address, but only contains a casual invitation and a link to Bill Siegel outlines a theory called the 'Control Factor' that frames Islam as a coordinated threa

20p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Personal recollections of economic discussions with Nobel laureates

The passage is a memoir-style narrative about academic conversations on monetary theory and ETFs, lacking any concrete leads, names of officials, financial transactions, or allegations of misconduct. Mentions Nobel laureates Franco Modigliani and Milton Friedman discussing monetary ideas. Describes a proposal to treat ETFs and mutual funds as money-like assets. Speculates on banking structural ch

1p
House OversightUnknown

Local sports roundup with Scott Boras comments on Dodgers and Mets valuations

Local sports roundup with Scott Boras comments on Dodgers and Mets valuations The passage is a mixed local sports article with no concrete allegations, financial transaction details, or actionable leads involving powerful officials. It mentions Scott Boras' remarks on MLB team sales and a vague reference to the Mets' payment to a Madoff trustee, but provides no names, dates, or evidence of wrongdoing. The content is largely routine sports reporting, offering minimal investigative value. Key insights: Scott Boras likens Dodgers and Mets financial situations to supermarket categories.; Dodgers reportedly sold for $2 billion; Mets owners to pay up to $162 million to a Madoff trustee.; Mentions of high‑profile MLB figures (Mark Walter, Stan Kasten, Magic Johnson) in Dodgers ownership group.

1p
Dept. of JusticeAug 22, 2017

15 July 7 2016 - July 17 2016 working progress_Redacted.pdf

Kristen M. Simkins From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Irons, Janet < Tuesday, July 12, 2016 10:47 AM Richard C. Smith     Hello Warden Smith,     mother is anxious to hear the results of your inquiry into her daughter's health.   I'd be grateful if you could  email or call me at your earliest convenience.  I'm free today after 2 p.m.  Alternatively, we could meet after the Prison  Board of Inspectors Meeting this coming Thursday.    Best wishes,    Janet Irons    1 Kristen M. Simkins From: Sent:

1196p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Support This ProjectSupported by 1,550+ people worldwide
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.