Skip to main content
Skip to content

Duplicate Document

This document appears to be a copy. The original version is:

Essay on Abuse Dynamics and BDSM Aftercare Lacks Concrete Leads
Case File
kaggle-ho-018657House Oversight

Essay on Abuse Dynamics and BDSM Aftercare Lacks Concrete Leads

Essay on Abuse Dynamics and BDSM Aftercare Lacks Concrete Leads The text is a personal reflection on abuse, arousal, and BDSM without mentioning any officials, institutions, financial transactions, or actionable investigative details. It offers no leads for further inquiry. Key insights: Discusses psychological aspects of abuse survivors and BDSM.; Mentions a study on S&M and intimacy but provides no specifics.; No names, dates, organizations, or allegations of misconduct.

Date
Unknown
Source
House Oversight
Reference
kaggle-ho-018657
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

Essay on Abuse Dynamics and BDSM Aftercare Lacks Concrete Leads The text is a personal reflection on abuse, arousal, and BDSM without mentioning any officials, institutions, financial transactions, or actionable investigative details. It offers no leads for further inquiry. Key insights: Discusses psychological aspects of abuse survivors and BDSM.; Mentions a study on S&M and intimacy but provides no specifics.; No names, dates, organizations, or allegations of misconduct.

Tags

kagglehouse-oversightabusebdsmpsychologyaftercare

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit
Review This Document

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
cruelest of design flaws and the worst people understand it and the most compassionate people don't. However, the conclusion is not that some people want abuse. By definition, abuse is something that destroys you, that leaves you feeling violated and harmed in a way you don't want. And part of that mechanism, that involves the desire for the abuse to continue, is that many of us are designed to want more intimacy once intimacy has been initiated with a person. Many of us don't want to be left. And the agony of feeling harmed by being left by someone you never wanted to be there in the first place is confusing and can be debilitating. No one wants to be harmed in this way. Among abuse survivor communities the arousal involved in abuse situations is often called "body betrayal," but this doesn't seem to encompass how deep the desires can be for some people. At the root, the desires are often the same desires that fit into normal healthy intimate relationships. To be loved, to have an ongoing interaction, to be seen and understood at the root of all your emotion, to be taken sexually and feel the pleasure of another enjoying your sexual arousal. But these emotions have been exploited and manipulated for the gain of others. For some number of people who have experienced abuse, the greatest split within the self does not simply come from how horrific the acts themselves were but from the feelings of desire and pleasure that can happen in human beings even during horrific unwanted acts. For some of us, BDSM can be a safe way to explore unpacking some of this desire and how these arousal patterns got mixed up with horrific things -- or were already hooked up to horrific things and that pre-existing fact was exploited by a harmful person. And for some of us, taking that out and playing with it may not be a necessary part of recovery at all. But simply knowing this -- the fact that your arousal and pleasure systems can be activated by harmful people is ok -- it does not mean you want it, it does not mean that it was good for you, or that anyone should have treated you in that way. That can be the greatest healing in and of itself. I want to thank her for allowing me to publish her words. Her description is so far from how I usually discuss or experience S&M; and yet I see connections, too, and people rarely discuss those connections. te OK ok Aftercare: Intimacy Within Positive and Consensual S&M A while back, a study came out that established that a consenting, positive S&M experience increases a couple's intimacy afterwards. I cite that study all the time, but I still find its existence kinda absurd; I mean, they could have just asked us how it felt. On the bright side, if S&M is being studied by Real Researchers, it's a sign that S&M is becoming more widely accepted. Yet for all its hormone level measurements and mood surveys, I didn't feel like the study got anywhere near the heart of S&M and how S&M creates such extraordinary intimacy. Why would it? Studies are science, and aftercare is art.

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Support This ProjectSupported by 1,550+ people worldwide
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.