Skip to main content
Skip to content

Duplicate Document

This document appears to be a copy. The original version is:

Witness claims police report contains 24 potential victims of alleged sexual abuse by Professor Alan Dershowitz
Case File
kaggle-ho-021853House Oversight

Witness claims police report contains 24 potential victims of alleged sexual abuse by Professor Alan Dershowitz

Witness claims police report contains 24 potential victims of alleged sexual abuse by Professor Alan Dershowitz The passage suggests the existence of a police report with redacted names of up to 24 girls who may have been abused by Dershowitz, indicating a concrete document and a list of potential victims. While the lead is unverified and lacks specific names or dates, it points to actionable evidence that could be subpoenaed or obtained through FOIA, making it a strong investigative lead. The controversy is high due to the involvement of a high‑profile attorney and the broader Epstein case, but the novelty is moderate because similar allegations have been reported before. Key insights: Witness says a police report exists that names 24 possible victims.; Report is reportedly public but redacted; names are hidden.; Witness could not obtain the names because key figures (including Epstein) refused to cooperate.

Date
Unknown
Source
House Oversight
Reference
kaggle-ho-021853
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

Witness claims police report contains 24 potential victims of alleged sexual abuse by Professor Alan Dershowitz The passage suggests the existence of a police report with redacted names of up to 24 girls who may have been abused by Dershowitz, indicating a concrete document and a list of potential victims. While the lead is unverified and lacks specific names or dates, it points to actionable evidence that could be subpoenaed or obtained through FOIA, making it a strong investigative lead. The controversy is high due to the involvement of a high‑profile attorney and the broader Epstein case, but the novelty is moderate because similar allegations have been reported before. Key insights: Witness says a police report exists that names 24 possible victims.; Report is reportedly public but redacted; names are hidden.; Witness could not obtain the names because key figures (including Epstein) refused to cooperate.

Tags

kagglehouse-oversighthigh-importancesexual-abusejeffrey-epsteinalan-dershowitzpolice-reportvictim-identification

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit
Review This Document

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Oo O DN OO FF WwW NY =| NO RO PO PNP NM NO | S| S| HS SF S| S| S| S| S| non BP WO NO -|- ODO OO WDN OO OT BP WO NYO — 30 Q. My question had nothing to do with whether you could identify girls that Jeffrey Epstein abused. My question was: As of December 30th, 2014 -- you don't have to give me the name right now -- is there any specific girl that you had evidence Professor Dershowitz abused? A. What I had was the police report moving girls and the girls were named in the police report, although the police report that I think has been made public has the names redacted, those girls were moving through the mansion at the time when, for example, household staff were saying that Mr. Dershowitz was receiving massages. And so, yes, I have 24 names in mind as possible sexual abuse victims that Dershowitz may or may not have abused. And I have not been able to pinpoint exactly what happened, because the people who would be in the best position to help me sort out what the names were, specifically Jeffrey Epstein among others, have refused to cooperate and give me those names. MR. SIMPSON: Move to strike the nonresponsive portion of the answer. THE WITNESS: Can I ask what part of that was nonresponsive in your view? MR. SCAROLA: That's all right. THE WITNESS: Okay. ROUGH DRAFT ONLY

Related Documents (6)

House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Alan Dershowitz defends representing Mike Tyson amid campus backlash

The passage only recounts public criticism and debate over Dershowitz's representation of Mike Tyson, without revealing new facts, financial transactions, or links to powerful officials. It offers lit Dershowitz faced letters and attacks for defending Tyson on appeal. Students threatened sexual harassment complaints over his classroom discussions. The controversy centers on the ethical debate of r

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Draft transcript excerpt mentions Jeffrey Epstein invoking the Fifth and a reference to Alan Dershowitz

The passage provides a vague, uncited reference to Epstein and Dershowitz refusing to answer questions in a hearing. It lacks concrete details—no dates, transactions, or specific allegations—making it Jeffrey Epstein allegedly took the Fifth Amendment during a court hearing. A question about Alan Dershowitz was raised, and he also invoked the Fifth. The excerpt is labeled as a rough draft and appe

1p
House OversightUnknown

Discovery Dispute Over Alan Dershowitz's Document Control in Defamation Suit

Discovery Dispute Over Alan Dershowitz's Document Control in Defamation Suit The passage outlines a procedural battle over production of documents and metadata in a defamation case involving Alan Dershowitz. While it flags potential evidence that could expose communications or internal materials, it lacks concrete details about the content, dates, or parties beyond the litigants, limiting immediate investigative value. However, the mention of “control” and alleged refusal to produce metadata could merit follow‑up to determine what information is being withheld and whether it relates to broader controversies surrounding Dershowitz. Key insights: Plaintiffs allege Dershowitz is withholding documents and metadata under the claim of ‘control’.; The objection is framed as ‘word play’ and gamesmanship, suggesting possible intentional concealment.; Discovery objections focus on timeframe limits, implying plaintiffs seek records spanning an undefined period.

1p
House OversightUnknown

Dershowitz seeks to seal Giuffre affidavit in Edwards‑Cassell defamation case, claims media attacks are fabricated

Dershowitz seeks to seal Giuffre affidavit in Edwards‑Cassell defamation case, claims media attacks are fabricated The passage hints at a possible concealment of evidence in a high‑profile defamation dispute involving Alan Dershowitz, a prominent attorney, and references the infamous Giuffre allegations. While it names well‑known legal figures, it provides no concrete financial transactions, dates, or new factual revelations beyond already public claims, limiting its investigative utility. However, the suggestion that a court record may be sealed to hide potentially damaging testimony offers a moderate lead for further document‑review and freedom‑of‑information requests. Key insights: Dershowitz requests the court to declare portions of Ms. Giuffre’s affidavit confidential.; He publicly denies the allegations on BBC Radio 4, framing them as a coordinated false‑story campaign.; Dershowitz threatens perjury prosecution against accusers and seeks disbarment of opposing counsel.

1p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

From: Lesley Groff

1p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

From: Lesley Groff <MIEll

1p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Support This ProjectSupported by 1,550+ people worldwide
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.