Skip to main content
Skip to content
1 duplicate copy in the archive
Case File
d-15404House OversightOther

Equity research note on Snap's upcoming earnings and DAU outlook

The document provides a standard analyst forecast for Snap's earnings, DAU metrics, and competitive risks. It contains no allegations, financial flow details, or connections to powerful officials or a Projected DAU range of 164‑166 million for Q1 ARPU forecast at $1.01, down 5% QoQ Potential lock‑up expiration impact on July 29

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #014920
Pages
1
Persons
2
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The document provides a standard analyst forecast for Snap's earnings, DAU metrics, and competitive risks. It contains no allegations, financial flow details, or connections to powerful officials or a Projected DAU range of 164‑166 million for Q1 ARPU forecast at $1.01, down 5% QoQ Potential lock‑up expiration impact on July 29

Tags

arpufinancial-forecaststock-analysisdaumarket-riskhouse-oversightsnapearnings-forecast

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit
Review This Document

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Snap (Neutral, $25 PO) Stock view: Long-term potential, but near-term could be lumpy Snap will report its first earnings as a public company and expectations have a wide range. The 2H16 DAU slowdown has raised concerns in terms of both competitive risk and execution, so user trends could be the most important metric in the quarter. At this point, it’s difficult to gauge relative impact of Facebook / Instagram competition, Android technical issues, product cycle lumpiness, and seasonality to the recent slowdown. Nonetheless, our sense is that DAU expectations are around 164-166mn, and we'd expect variability (higher or lower) to have a meaningful impact on stock sentiment. In terms of the P&L, we expect a slight q/q decline in revenue per normal seasonality and are modeling down 1% q/q (consistent with comments in the prospectus filing}. While we can appreciate the momentum of the API roll-out with several new partnerships announced in January, our checks suggest most programs are early stage with limited volume to date. Considering the rest of the P&L, we expect a fairly messy quarter between deal costs, the CEO stock award, and a catch-up RSU stock comp expense. As we do not anticipate non-GAAP profitability until 2H19, we expect traditional P&L metrics will be less of a focus in the coming quarters. We recently initiated coverage with a Neutral and $25 price target (please see User overhang unlikely to be resolved in a Snap — Initiate at Neutral with $25 PQ). Social media sector history suggests a wide range of possible outcomes for Snap and, as such, near-term lumpiness in metrics could result in high volatility for the stock. We also note that lock-up overhang could drag on near-term performance into the first lock-up expiration on 7/29. Key theme/metric(s) for 1Q: DAUs, ARPU, and competition We believe the key metric for the quarter will be the DAU number, which we model at 166mn (up 8mn q/q, 36% y/y). We believe DAU headwinds may peak 1H17 as the company is facing an onslaught of competitive products (see More Stories in the Snap competitive saga), technical challenges with Android (from Memories), and seasonality entering the summer. We model ARPU at $1.01 (down 5% q/q), with North America ARPU at $2.03 (down 7% q/q). We won't be surprised to see upside in ARPU driven by ad load growth and higher user engagement, though competitive pricing could potentially offset. Biggest 1Q issues/risks: ¢ DAU deceleration on share loss: Anything short of 164mn will likely be met with skepticism as investors extrapolate recent trends in considering competitive resilience vs Instagram, Facebook, and others. Management will likely address the Android technical issues impact on DAUs. + Aggressive pricing could drive short term growth but have mixed perception: Twitter noted elevated competition and potentially aggressive pricing surfacing in mid-January, which aligns well with Snap’s API update. ¢ Lack of visibility into pipeline: While we don’t necessarily expect new product announcements, lack of color/visibility on the product pipeline could disappoint. ¢ Results could leave investors looking for more disclosure: We are not sure what disclosure Snap will provide on results, and important trending info (like average minutes per user) could be lacking. Top 1Q data points: comScore suggests some gains for Instagram While comScore data is not consistent with reported minutes, it is useful for relative comparisons. The data puts Snapchat minutes per user well above Twitter, but still . Bankof America 34 Internet/e-Commerce | 06 April 2017 Merrill Lynch

Related Documents (6)

House OversightNov 21, 2016

BofA 2017 Rates, FX & EM Trade Recommendations Referencing Trump and Xi Policies

BofA 2017 Rates, FX & EM Trade Recommendations Referencing Trump and Xi Policies The document is an internal investment strategy memo that mentions political leaders only in the context of macroeconomic forecasts. It contains no concrete allegations, financial flow details, or evidence of misconduct involving high‑level officials, making it a low‑value lead for investigation. Key insights: Predicts two and a half Fed hikes in 2017‑18 despite expected fiscal easing by the Trump administration.; Recommends buying USD/JPY based on anticipated Japanese bond yield policy and a Trump win.; Suggests buying USD call/CNH put, citing a ‘collision course’ between Trump’s need for a weak USD and Xi’s need for a weak CNY.

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Equity Research Note on TripAdvisor, Aetna, and Consolidated Edison – Tax Policy and Market Outlook

The passage is a standard investment research memo discussing tax policy impacts, earnings guidance, and valuation assumptions. It contains no actionable leads, allegations, or connections to high‑pro Trump tax plan could lower corporate tax rates from 35% to 15%, potentially incentivising repatriati TripAdvisor faces margin pressure from rising ad spend and mobile user shift. Potential consolidat

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Bank of America Merrill Lynch Research Disclosure Boilerplate

The document is a standard regulatory disclosure with no specific allegations, names, transactions, or actionable information linking influential actors to misconduct. It provides only generic complia Describes compensation structure for analysts tied to bank profitability. Lists numerous global regulatory jurisdictions for BofA Merrill Lynch affiliates. Contains no substantive claims about financ

5p
House OversightUnknown

Equity research note on Norfolk Southern Railway with regulatory and tax outlook

Equity research note on Norfolk Southern Railway with regulatory and tax outlook The passage is a standard investment analysis focusing on financial metrics, regulatory changes, and tax policy impacts for Norfolk Southern. It contains no allegations, misconduct, or connections to high‑profile political or intelligence actors, offering no actionable investigative leads. Key insights: Norfolk Southern market cap $33.4B, P/E 17.3x, low short interest.; Potential turnover at the Surface Transportation Board with a Republican chair.; Effective tax rate for U.S. railroads cited at 37%; tax reform could boost EPS.

1p
House OversightUnknown

Bank of America Merrill Lynch sector correlation analysis (2017) – no direct political or misconduct leads

Bank of America Merrill Lynch sector correlation analysis (2017) – no direct political or misconduct leads The passage is a technical market‑research chart showing intra‑sector stock correlations. It contains no names of political figures, government agencies, foreign leaders, or financial flows that could be investigated for wrongdoing. Consequently it offers no actionable lead for investigative journalism. Key insights: Provides 3‑month intra‑sector correlation percentiles for 19 SXXP sectors (e.g., personal goods 17%, utilities 24%).; Notes that overall intra‑sector correlation is near a 10‑year low as of June 2017.; Mentions implied‑realised correlation spread at a 5‑year high, driven by company‑specific divergence.

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Tax impact estimates for House vs. Trump corporate tax plans

The passage provides macroeconomic tax revenue projections and sectoral effects, but contains no allegations, financial flows, or links to influential individuals or misconduct. It offers limited inve Projected 10‑year revenue loss ranging from $2.4‑$3.1 tn under House plan to $4.4‑$6.2 tn under Trum Breakdown of corporate tax reforms such as lower rates, full capex expensing, and border adjustmen

1p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Support This ProjectSupported by 1,550+ people worldwide
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.