Skip to main content
Skip to content
1 duplicate copy in the archive
Case File
d-32210House Oversight

Court discussion on business record exception and admissibility of witness statements

Other

The passage merely outlines a procedural debate over evidentiary rules (Rule 803(6)) and mentions low‑profile individuals (Ms. McCawley, Ms. Maxwell, Mr. Pagliuca). It provides no concrete leads on fi Debate over whether documents qualify under Rule 803(6) business record exception. Ms. McCawley seeks to introduce 87 pages of anonymous witness statements. Mr. Pagliuca argues that hearsay portions

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #011432
Pages
1
Persons
12
Integrity
No Hash Available
Loading document viewer...

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit
Review This Document

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Support This ProjectSupported by 1,550+ people worldwide
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.