Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00020699DOJ Data Set 8Correspondence

EFTA00020699

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 8
Reference
efta-efta00020699
Pages
0
Persons
0
Integrity
Loading PDF viewer...

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit
Review This Document

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: Sandra Perkins To: Cc: Si v. Maxwell, 15 Civ. 7433 Peter Skinner Subject: RE: legal process, regarding In re Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2019 21:01:17 +0000 Attachments: 2019-04-1 8_G.I_Subpoena_ResponseiSealed_Order,_19_M ise._1 49).pd f On behalf of attorney, Peter Skinner, please see the attached correspondence. In addition, I will be transmitting a secured link to related materials via our BSF ShareFile system. Please feel free to contact me should you have any difficulty accessing the materials. Sandra Perkins Case Manager BOIES SCHILLER FLEXNER LLP From: Sent: Monday, April 15, 2019 7:49 PM To: Peter Skinner Cc: Si rid McCawlev Sandra Perkins Subject: RE: legal process, regarding In re v. Maxwell, 15 Civ. 7433 Mr. Skinner, In connection with the rand iury subpoena (the "Subpoena") directed to Boies Schiller Flexner LLP ("BSF"), in connection with the case captioned v. Maxwell, 15 Civ. 7433 (RWS), in the Southern District of New York, served on February 5, 2019, attached please find a sealed order (the "Order") granting permission to BSF to comply with the Subpoena through the production of discovery materials marked "CONFIDENTIAL" pursuant to the protective order in that case. Please note that although the Order permits the provision of a copy to BSF, it is otherwise sealed. A copy of the Subpoena is also attached for your convenience. I also note in particular that the Order applies only to the above-captioned litigation, and not to any other litigation including but not limited to In re Jane Doe 43 v. Epstein, et at, 17 Civ. 0616. Please produce only materials in connection with the case to which the Order applies. Please let me know if you have any additional questions regarding the Order, or if it would be useful to discuss production methods and/or schedule. thank you, EFTA00020699 The information contained in this electronic message is confidential information intended only for the use of the named recipients) and may contain information that. among other protections, is the subject of attorney-client privilege. attorney work product or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this electronic message is not the named recipient. or the employee or agent responsible to deliver it to the named recipient. you are hereby notified that any dissemination. distribution. copying or other use of this communication is strictly prohibited and no privilege is waived. If you have received this communication in error. please immediately notify the sender by replying to this electronic message and then deleting this electronic message from your computer. (v.1 08201831BS9 EFTA00020700

Related Documents (6)

House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Scholarly Article Argues Crime Victims' Rights Act Applies Pre‑Charging, Citing Jeffrey Epstein Case

The passage outlines a legal argument that the federal Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) should apply before criminal charges are filed, using the high‑profile Jeffrey Epstein case as an illustration. The DOJ’s Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) issued a 2011 memo limiting CVRA rights to post‑charging sta Sen. Jon Kyl publicly objected to the OLC memo, asserting CVRA rights attach during investigations

63p
House OversightFeb 5, 2014

Scholarly article argues Crime Victims’ Rights Act applies before criminal charges are filed, citing Jeffrey Epstein case

Scholarly article argues Crime Victims’ Rights Act applies before criminal charges are filed, citing Jeffrey Epstein case The passage discusses legal scholarship on the scope of the Crime Victims’ Rights Act (CVRA) and references the Jeffrey Epstein case to illustrate pre‑charging victim rights. While it mentions high‑profile actors (Sen. Jon Kyl, Attorney General Eric Holder, Jeffrey Epstein), it does not provide new factual allegations, undisclosed transactions, or actionable evidence of misconduct. The content is largely a policy analysis and citation of existing case law, offering limited investigative value beyond confirming existing legal debates. Key insights: CVRA may extend victim rights during investigations, not just after charges are filed.; Senator Jon Kyl objected to DOJ's 2010 memo limiting CVRA rights.; Jeffrey Epstein victims claim they were excluded from a non‑prosecution agreement.

1p
Court UnsealedNov 8, 2019

Epstein Exhibits

Case 18-2868, Document 278, 08/09/2019, 2628230, Page1 of 648 EXHIBIT A Case 18-2868, Document 278, 08/09/2019, 2628230, Page2 of 648 6114:2016 Prince Andrew and girl, 17, who sex o?er?er friend flew to Britain to meet him Daily Mail Ontine Daily ail .com Home I U.K. Sports Showbiz [Australia [Femail [Health [Science [Money [Video [Travel [Columnists tr am .22: ,t Latest wisestii?tr?e Prince Andrew and the 17-year-old girl his 1 sex offender friend flew to Britain to

648p
DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA00020697

0p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Scholarly article argues Crime Victims’ Rights Act applies before criminal charges are filed, citing Jeffrey Epstein case

The passage discusses legal scholarship on the scope of the Crime Victims’ Rights Act (CVRA) and references the Jeffrey Epstein case to illustrate pre‑charging victim rights. While it mentions high‑pr CVRA may extend victim rights during investigations, not just after charges are filed. Senator Jon Kyl objected to DOJ's 2010 memo limiting CVRA rights. Jeffrey Epstein victims claim they were exclud

64p
House OversightFeb 28, 2019

LexisNexis search record for crime victims' rights article (Feb 28, 2019)

LexisNexis search record for crime victims' rights article (Feb 28, 2019) The document is merely a metadata log of a legal research query with no substantive allegations, names, transactions, or actionable leads linking powerful actors to controversy. Key insights: User David Schoen performed a LexisNexis search on 'cvra and sixth amendment'.; The search returned a law review article on crime victims' rights during investigations.; No individuals, agencies, or financial flows are mentioned.

1p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Support This ProjectSupported by 1,550+ people worldwide
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.