Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00212816DOJ Data Set 9Other

From: Brad Edwards

From: Brad Edwards To: (USAFLS)" Subject: Re: Jane Does v. U.S. -- Motion to Unseal Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2011 19:45:19 +0000 Importance: Normal I will look at it in about an hour and get back to you asap. Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T From: (USAFLS)" Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2011 13:57:01 -0400 To: Brad Edwards Cc: (USAFLS) Subject: Jane Does v. U.S. -- Motion to Unseal Dear Brad: Hope you are doing well. I wondered whether you had a chance to review the In re Smith case, 656 F.2d 1101, that I had discussed with you earlier. Based on that case and its progeny, in particular Senate of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico v. United States Dep't of Justice, 1992 WI_ 119127 at *3 (D.D.C. May 13, 1992) and United States v. Anderson, 55 F. Stipp. 2d 1163, 1168 (D. Kan. 1999), I believe that the following portions of your Exhibit A should remain under seal (and any related portions of DE48): 005 [words "1512 and 113"] 006-007 008 [paragraph 1 only] 016 [words "S," "403," "113," and "371

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00212816
Pages
2
Persons
3
Integrity

Summary

From: Brad Edwards To: (USAFLS)" Subject: Re: Jane Does v. U.S. -- Motion to Unseal Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2011 19:45:19 +0000 Importance: Normal I will look at it in about an hour and get back to you asap. Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T From: (USAFLS)" Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2011 13:57:01 -0400 To: Brad Edwards Cc: (USAFLS) Subject: Jane Does v. U.S. -- Motion to Unseal Dear Brad: Hope you are doing well. I wondered whether you had a chance to review the In re Smith case, 656 F.2d 1101, that I had discussed with you earlier. Based on that case and its progeny, in particular Senate of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico v. United States Dep't of Justice, 1992 WI_ 119127 at *3 (D.D.C. May 13, 1992) and United States v. Anderson, 55 F. Stipp. 2d 1163, 1168 (D. Kan. 1999), I believe that the following portions of your Exhibit A should remain under seal (and any related portions of DE48): 005 [words "1512 and 113"] 006-007 008 [paragraph 1 only] 016 [words "S," "403," "113," and "371

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit
Review This Document

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: Brad Edwards To: (USAFLS)" Subject: Re: Jane Does v. U.S. -- Motion to Unseal Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2011 19:45:19 +0000 Importance: Normal I will look at it in about an hour and get back to you asap. Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T From: (USAFLS)" Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2011 13:57:01 -0400 To: Brad Edwards Cc: (USAFLS) Subject: Jane Does v. U.S. -- Motion to Unseal Dear Brad: Hope you are doing well. I wondered whether you had a chance to review the In re Smith case, 656 F.2d 1101, that I had discussed with you earlier. Based on that case and its progeny, in particular Senate of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico v. United States Dep't of Justice, 1992 WI_ 119127 at *3 (D.D.C. May 13, 1992) and United States v. Anderson, 55 F. Stipp. 2d 1163, 1168 (D. Kan. 1999), I believe that the following portions of your Exhibit A should remain under seal (and any related portions of DE48): 005 [words "1512 and 113"] 006-007 008 [paragraph 1 only] 016 [words "S," "403," "113," and "371 conspiracy"] 017-018 019 [paragraph 1 only] 028 ["1512"] 029 [first 2 paragraphs] 030 [numbered paragraphs 2, 3, and 4] 036 [numbered paragraphs 1(a) and 1(c)] 042 [word "1512"] 045 [word "1512(d), 046-048 049 [paragraph 1] EFTA00212816 057 [first sentence] 058 059 [first sentence] 062-063 ["1512"] 064 [paragraph 1] 071 ["1512"] 073 [" 1512"] 191 [3rd full paragraph, 3rd and 5th sentences] 192 [4th full paragraph [2nd and 3rd sentences] 300-309 310 329-340 350-358 The names Lesley Groff, and in any copies of the draft NPA Also, do you have any objections to redacting my personal email address and personal cell phone numbers in Bates numbers 005, 016, 026-030, 039, 056, 062, 072, 073, 088, 090, 097-098, 177, 180? You may not know that prisoners have access to PACER. Thank you! Assistant U.S. Attorney 500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 EFTA00212817

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 74

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 74 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/02/2011 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2 1. UNITED STATES JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2'S REPLY TO GOVERNMENT'S RESPONSE TO THEIR MOTION TO USE CORRESPONDENCE TO PROVE VIOLATIONS OF THE CRIME VICTIMS' RIGHTS ACT AND TO HAVE THEIR UNREDACTED PLEADINGS UNSEALED COME NOW Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 (also referred to as "the victims"), by and through undersigned counsel, reply to the Government's response (DE #60) to their motion to use correspondence to prove violations of the Crime Victims' Right Act and to Have Their Unredacted Pleadings Unsealed (DE #51). The Government does not contest the first part of the victims' motion — that they should be allowed to use the correspondence to prove CVRA violations — and that part of the victims' motion should therefore be granted. The Government does argue that some parts

9p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOES #1 and #2 I UNITED STATES JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2'S MOTION FOR FINDING OF VIOLATIONS OF THE CRIME VICTIMS' RIGHTS ACT, REQUEST FOR AN EVIDENTIARY HEARING IF FACTS ARE CONTESTED, AND REQUEST FOR HEARING ON APPROPRIATE REMEDIES COMES NOW Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 (also referred to as "the victims"), by and through undersigned counsel, to move for a finding from this Court that their rights as crime victims under the Crime Victims Rights Act (CVRA) have been repeatedly violated by the U.S. Attorney's Office, to request an evidentiary hearing to establish those violations if the U.S. Attorney's Office contests the underlying facts, and to request a brief schedule and a hearing on the appropriate remedies for these violations. As recounted in more detail below, the victims have recently-obtained correspondence between the U.S. Attorney's Office and defendant Jeffrey

29p
OtherUnknown

NAME SEARCHED: Jeffrey Epstein

DOJ EFTA Data Set 10 document EFTA01296720

114p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOES #1 and #2 v. UNITED STATES JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2'S MOTION FOR FINDING OF VIOLATIONS OF THE CRIME VICTIMS' RIGHTS ACT, REQUEST FOR AN EVIDENTIARY HEARING IF FACTS ARE CONTESTED, AND REQUEST FOR HEARING ON APPROPRIATE REMEDIES COMES NOW Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 (also referred to as "the victims"), by and through undersigned counsel, to move for a finding from this Court that their rights as crime victims under the Crime Victims Rights Act (CVRA) have been repeatedly violated by the U.S. Attorney's Office, to request an evidentiary hearing to establish those violations if the U.S. Attorney's Office contests the underlying facts, and to request a brief schedule and a hearing on the appropriate remedies for these violations. As recounted in more detail below, the victims have recently-obtained correspondence between the U.S. Attorney's Office and defendant Jeffre

29p
Court UnsealedSep 9, 2019

Epstein Depositions

10. 11. 12. l3. 14. 16. 17. l8. 19. Jeffrey Epstein v. Bradley J. Edwards, et Case No.: 50 2009 CA Attachments to Statement of Undisputed Facts Deposition of Jeffrey Epstein taken March 17, 2010 Deposition of Jane Doe taken March 11, 2010 (Pages 379, 380, 527, 564?67, 568) Deposition of LM. taken September 24, 2009 (Pages 73, 74, 164, 141, 605, 416) Deposition ofE.W. taken May 6, 2010 (1 15, 1.16, 255, 205, 215?216) Deposition of Jane Doe #4 (32-34, 136) Deposition of Jeffrey Eps

839p
DOJ Data Set 9Financial RecordUnknown

SUSPECTED MOTIVE BEHIND GOVERNMENT AND POLICE SOURCES INVOLVED

SUSPECTED MOTIVE BEHIND GOVERNMENT AND POLICE SOURCES INVOLVED IN CONSPIRED COVER UP OF FAMIL L MOLESTATION OF TARGETED VICTIM TH H R BY THE BROTHER FAMILY MEMBER ANTHEThra GATION AND CON- SPIRED ATTACK Or rit /WILY I O DEMORALISE THE DAUGHTER, SISTER AND DISCREDIT HER CREDITABILITY AND TARGETING HER WITH A SEXUAL ABUSE RING CONNECTED TO GOVERNMENT SOURCES AND EPSTEIN AND MAXWELL SUSPECTED MOTIVE OF GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS INVOLVEMENT : COMMENCEMENT - KADINA • JOHN OLSEN - MAYOR OF KADINA - LIBERAL GOVERNMENT MEMBER • ROWAN RAMSAY - FEDERAL GOVERNMENT MEMBER - KADINA AND PORT PIRIE The mother, i= suspected of being sexually active in the community of Kadina as a teenager invo ving sexual interaction with the government officials involved in Kadina John Olsen, Kadina and Rowan Ramsay, Kadina / Port Pine and the overnment officials knowledge of this sexual activity and manipulated by the mother to assist in the family secret cover up under the act of the motive of th

70p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Support This ProjectSupported by 1,550+ people worldwide
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.