Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
kaggle-ho-014006House Oversight

Guide to Outsourcing Personal Email Management

Guide to Outsourcing Personal Email Management The document provides personal productivity tips for delegating email handling. It mentions no influential actors, financial transactions, or misconduct, offering no actionable investigative leads. Key insights: Author uses multiple email accounts and assistants to filter 1,000+ daily messages.; A daily 4‑10 minute call with an assistant handles the 1% of emails requiring personal input.; Process includes voicemail, Skype, and rule‑based automation.

Date
Unknown
Source
House Oversight
Reference
kaggle-ho-014006
Pages
1
Persons
2
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

Guide to Outsourcing Personal Email Management The document provides personal productivity tips for delegating email handling. It mentions no influential actors, financial transactions, or misconduct, offering no actionable investigative leads. Key insights: Author uses multiple email accounts and assistants to filter 1,000+ daily messages.; A daily 4‑10 minute call with an assistant handles the 1% of emails requiring personal input.; Process includes voicemail, Skype, and rule‑based automation.

Tags

kagglehouse-oversightproductivityemail-managementvirtual-assistants

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit
Review This Document

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
mail Again y hat if you never had to check e-mail again? If you could hire someone else to spend countless hours in your inbox instead of you? This isn’t pure fantasy. For the last 12 months, I’ve experimented with removing myself from the inbox entirely by training other people to behave like me. Not to imitate me, but to think like me. Here’s the upshot: I get more than 1,000 e-mails a day from various accounts.®2 Rather than spending 6-8 hours per day checking e-mail, which I used to do, I can skip reading e-mail altogether for days or even weeks at a time ... all within 4-10 minutes a night. Let me explain the basics, followed by tips and exact templates for outsourcing your own inbox. 1. I have multiple e-mail addresses for specific types of e-mail (blog readers vs. media vs. friends/family, etc.). tim@ ... is the default I give to new acquaintances, which goes to my assistant. 2. 99% of e-mail falls into predetermined categories of inquiries with set questions or responses (my “rules” document is at the bottom of this post—feel free to steal, adapt, and use). My assistant(s) checks and clears the inbox at 11 A.M. and 3 P.M. pst. 3. For the 1% of e-mail that might require my input for next actions, I have a once-daily phone call of 4—10 minutes at 4 P.M. pst with my assistant. 4. If ’'m busy or traveling abroad, my assistant leaves the action items in numerical order on my voicemail, which I can respond to in a bullet-point e-mail. These days, I actually prefer the voice-mail option and find that it forces my assistant to be more prepared and more concise. Each night (or early the next morning), [Il listen to my assistant’s voicemail via Skype and simultaneously write out the next actions (1. Bob: Tell him that ... 2. Jose in Peru: Ask him for ... 3. Speaking in NC: Confirm ..., etc.) in a Skype chat or quick e-mail. How long does the new system take? 4—10 minutes instead of 6-8 hours of filtering and repetitive responses. If you only have one e-mail account, I recommend using a desktop program like Outlook or Mail instead of a web-based program like Gmail for a simple reason: If you see new items in your inbox, you'll check them. Like they say in AA: If you don’t want to slip, don’t go where it’s slippery. This is why I have a private personal account that I use for sending e-mail to my assistant and communicating with friends. It’s almost always empty. E-mail is the last thing people let go of. Fortune 500 CEOs, best-selling authors, celebrities —I know dozens of top performers who delegate everything but e-mail, which they latch onto as something only they can do. “No one can check my e-mail for me” is the unquestioned assumption, or “I answer every e-mail I receive” is the unquestioned bragging right that keeps them in front of a computer for 8-12 hours at a stretch. It’s not fun, and it keeps them from higher-impact or more rewarding activities. Get over yourself. I had to. Checking e-mail isn’t some amazing skill that you alone possess. In fact, checking e-mail is like everything else: a process. How you evaluate and handle (delete vs. archive vs. forward vs. respond) e-mail is just a series of questions you ask yourself, whether consciously or subconsciously. I have a document called “Tim Ferriss Processing Rules,” to which my assistants add rules when I send them a note via e-mail with “ADD TO RULES” in the subject. Over the course of a week or two with a virtual assistant (VA), you will end up with an externalized set of rules that reflect how your brain processes e-mail. It often shows you how haphazard your processing is. I’ve included my “rules” here to save you some time. A few tips:

Related Documents (6)

House OversightUnknown

President Trump discusses Bob Woodward interview on phone, claims staff ignorance

President Trump discusses Bob Woodward interview on phone, claims staff ignorance The passage provides a brief anecdote of Trump’s phone call with journalist Bob Woodward, noting a claim that White House staff failed to inform him of the interview request. While it mentions a high‑profile figure (President Trump) and a senior aide (Kellyanne Conway), it lacks concrete details about wrongdoing, financial flows, or actionable leads. The information is already publicly reported and offers little novel investigative value. Key insights: Trump claims his staff did not tell him Woodward wanted an interview.; Kellyanne Conway is referenced as having asked Trump about a call.; Trump characterizes Woodward as "always been fair" but later calls the book inaccurate.

1p
Dept. of JusticeAug 22, 2017

15 July 7 2016 - July 17 2016 working progress_Redacted.pdf

Kristen M. Simkins From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Irons, Janet < Tuesday, July 12, 2016 10:47 AM Richard C. Smith     Hello Warden Smith,     mother is anxious to hear the results of your inquiry into her daughter's health.   I'd be grateful if you could  email or call me at your earliest convenience.  I'm free today after 2 p.m.  Alternatively, we could meet after the Prison  Board of Inspectors Meeting this coming Thursday.    Best wishes,    Janet Irons    1 Kristen M. Simkins From: Sent:

1196p
House OversightUnknown

Kirkland & Ellis Letter (June 19, 2008) from Kenneth Starr urging DOJ Deputy Attorney General to halt federal prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein

Kirkland & Ellis Letter (June 19, 2008) from Kenneth Starr urging DOJ Deputy Attorney General to halt federal prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein The document provides a detailed, contemporaneous account of alleged prosecutorial misconduct, a violated Non‑Prosecution Agreement, and mentions high‑level officials (Deputy Attorney General, Assistant U.S. Attorneys, former President Bill Clinton) that could be pursued for further investigation. It includes specific dates, subpoena details, and names of attorneys, offering concrete leads, but the claims are largely unverified and rely on the law firm’s advocacy, limiting its immediate explosiveness. Key insights: Letter dated June 19, 2008 from Kenneth W. Starr (Kirkland & Ellis) to Deputy Attorney General John Roth.; Claims that the federal grand jury investigation was re‑started in violation of a September 24, 2007 Non‑Prosecution Agreement with Epstein.; Alleges misconduct by Assistant U.S. Attorneys Villafana and Sloman, including alleged self‑dealing and conflict‑of‑interest.

1p
Dept. of JusticeFinancial RecordUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01388671

To: Stewart Oldfield Subject: Butterfly Trust Hi Stew, Based on the updated documentation received regarding this trust, we will need to update our KYC on file for the new beneficiaries. Please provide the full legal name and address of each new beneficiary. Once we obtain this information, our records will be up to date. Thank you. Kind regards, Cynthia Rodriguez <image00 I .png> Cynthia Rodriguez Assistant We President Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas Deutsche Asset & Weatth M

1p
Dept. of JusticeOtherUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01344003

Amanda Kirby Associate ank T t ny Americas <Mail Attachment.gif> From: Lesley Groff < To: Date: 0027201311:04 AM Subject: Re: Meeting with Jeffrey — Week of October 8 Amanda, we can tentatively hold this date/time. ..but Jeffrey does not want to make a decision until next week...so we will revisit this... thanks! Lesley On Sep 27, 2013, at 10:51 AM, Amanda Kirby < wrote: Classification: Public assistant said that an 8am breakfast meeting would work on the 10th. If that doesn't

1p
Dept. of JusticeFinancial RecordUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01424993

Subject: RE: Any chance ou also have the Mort certificate handy? Thanks From: Richard Iarossi Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2018 17:54:27 -0400 To: Bella Klein Stewart Oldfield Cc: Richard Kahn Bradley Gillin ilM1~1~1~> Hi Bella, Thank you for all of these. I've gone through the list and I believe that Neptune, LLC and Jeepers, Inc. would be the last two outstanding COGS. Please correct me if these have been sent already. Regards, Rich Richard Iarossi Assistant Vice President Deutsche Bank W

6p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Support This ProjectSupported by 1,550+ people worldwide
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.