Juror Number 50
juror who gave press interviews after the verdict
Mentioned in 47 documents. Roles: juror who gave press interviews after the verdict, Juror whose responses during jury selection are at issue, juror whose questionnaires are relevant to the defendant's motion for a new trial, Juror accused of misconduct, Juror in the case
Juror Number 50 is mentioned in documents or reporting related to the Epstein case. Being mentioned does not imply any wrongdoing, criminal conduct, or inappropriate behavior.
At a Glance
Click values for sourcesSources
10 sources for document mentions
Court Transcript: 2020-cr-00038
“The transcript records the voir dire process for Juror No. 49 and Juror No. 50 in the case against M”
Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion to Intervene and for Release of Sealed Jury Questionnaire and Transcript: 609
“Juror 50 is seeking to intervene in the Ghislaine Maxwell case to protect their privacy rights and p”
Court Transcript: 613-2
“The transcript records the voir dire examination of Juror No. 50 in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial. The”
Court Transcript: 6423-2
“The transcript captures the court's interaction with Juror No. 50 during voir dire, assessing their ”
Court Transcript: 645
“The transcript is from a hearing in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ne”
Sources
1 source for known connections
Co-Document Mentions
“Named alongside other network members in 167 documents”
Known Connections (19)
Document Mentions (50)
Juror Number 50 declares under penalty of perjury that their answers in the Jury Questionnaire are t...
Juror Number 50 declares under penalty of perjury that their answers in the Jury Questionnaire are true and correct, and that they completed it without assistance or discussion with others. The declaration is signed on November 4, 2021, using their Juror Number. This document is part of a larger court filing.
The court has been notified that Juror Number 50 has retained counsel and does not require court-app...
The court has been notified that Juror Number 50 has retained counsel and does not require court-appointed counsel. The court has directed retained counsel to review a prior order. The matter is related to the Ghislaine Maxwell case.
court filing: 20-00330-PAE
The document discusses the jury selection process in Ghislane Maxwell's trial, the conviction, and Juror 50's subsequent revelation of being a survivor of child sexual abuse, which he had not disclosed during the jury questionnaire.
Court Filing - Appellate Brief: 20-00630
The document discusses Maxwell's appeal of the District Court's denial of her motion for a new trial, arguing that Juror 50's failure to accurately respond to questions about his history of sexual abuse during jury selection compromised her right to a fair and impartial jury. The appellate court reviews the District Court's decision for 'abuse of discretion' and defers to its judgment, citing the high standard for granting a new trial. The court ultimately upholds the District Court's denial of Maxwell's motion.
court filing: 20-2008
The document argues that the right to public access to court documents, including juror questionnaires, is essential and that delaying access undermines this right. It also asserts that the First Amendment right of access applies to these documents and that sealing them is not justified. The document is likely a court filing related to a defendant's motion for a new trial.
Court Filing: 20-2200330
Ghislaine Maxwell appealed her conviction for sex trafficking and related crimes, raising several issues including the validity of her prosecution and juror misconduct. The court affirmed the district court's judgment, finding no errors in the conduct of the case. Maxwell was sentenced to 240 months' imprisonment followed by supervised release.
Declaration: 2020-00000000-AEN
Juror Number 50 declares under penalty of perjury that their answers in the Jury Questionnaire are true and correct, and that they completed it without assistance or discussion with others. The declaration is signed on November 4, 2021, using their Juror Number. This document is part of a larger court filing.
Court Filing: 2020-0088
The defense argues that Ghislaine Maxwell's Motion for a New Trial should remain sealed to prevent Juror 50 from being influenced by outside information and to protect her constitutional right to a fair trial. The motion asserts that unsealing the document would compromise the integrity of any potential hearing or inquiry. The defense cites the need to safeguard the truth-seeking process and prevent the tainting of Juror 50's testimony.
court filing: 2020-0088630
The document is a court filing arguing that a motion related to Juror 50 should remain sealed to protect Ms. Maxwell's right to a fair trial. The defense counsel asserts that unsealing the motion would give Juror 50 an improper preview of the defense's position and potentially allow him to tailor his answers or destroy evidence. The filing cites relevant case law to support the argument that the motion should be temporarily sealed until the court rules on it or completes any additional fact-finding process.
Court Transcript: 2020-cr-00038
The transcript records the voir dire process for Juror No. 49 and Juror No. 50 in the case against Ms. Maxwell. The court and attorneys question the jurors to assess their ability to be fair and impartial, their background, and their understanding of the legal process.
Court Filing - Appellate Decision: 22-14226
The document is an appellate court decision affirming Ghislaine Maxwell's conviction and sentence. The court held that the Non-Prosecution Agreement between Jeffrey Epstein and the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida did not bar Maxwell's prosecution. The court also found that Maxwell's sentence was procedurally reasonable.
Court Filing - Appellate Decision: 22-14226, Document: 1109-11
The document is an appellate court decision affirming Ghislaine Maxwell's conviction and sentence, addressing issues including the effect of Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement on Maxwell's prosecution, statute of limitations, and the District Court's handling of jury voir dire and a jury note.
Court Filing: 22-1426, Document 78
The court is holding an evidentiary hearing to investigate whether Juror 50 lied on a questionnaire about being a victim of sexual abuse and a crime. The hearing will be limited to Juror 50's answers to two specific questions on the questionnaire. The court rejected the defendant's request to investigate Juror 50's social media usage.
Court Order: 573
The court has been notified that Juror Number 50 has retained counsel and does not require court-appointed counsel. The court has directed retained counsel to review a prior order. The matter is related to the Ghislaine Maxwell case.
Court Order: 575
The court orders the parties to submit proposed redactions to Juror 50's questionnaire and voir dire by January 13, 2022, and to respond to the juror's motion by January 20, 2022. The court also withdraws its prior order allowing Juror 50 to submit on the issue of inquiry until the motion to intervene is resolved.
Showing 15 of 50 documents. View all →
This dossier on Juror Number 50 was compiled from court records, flight logs, and public documents. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.