Mr. Schoeman
witness being deposed
Mentioned in 13 documents. Roles: witness being deposed, witness, person informed by Ms. Trzaskoma, likely an attorney or representative involved in the case, involved in responding to judge's questions about jury consultants
Mr. Schoeman is mentioned in documents or reporting related to the Epstein case. Being mentioned does not imply any wrongdoing, criminal conduct, or inappropriate behavior.
At a Glance
Click values for sourcesSources
10 sources for document mentions
deposition: 1:20-cv-03038-PAE Document 616-1 Filed 02/24/22 Page 73 of 117
“Mr. Schoeman testifies that he didn't know if more information would have helped his analysis of Jur”
deposition transcript: 1:20-cv-13038
“The witness, Schoeman, testifies about a conversation with Ms. Trzaskoma regarding Juror No. 1, disc”
deposition transcript: A-5761
“The deposition transcript discusses the voir dire process, jury consultants, and an investigation re”
deposition transcript: A-5762
“The witness, Brune, testifies about the Nardello firm's investigative work and its connection to Jur”
deposition transcript: A-5816
“The document is a transcript of the direct examination of Mr. Schoeman, a lawyer at Kramer Levin, wh”
Sources
1 source for known connections
Co-Document Mentions
“Named alongside other network members in 45 documents”
Known Connections (15)
Document Mentions (14)
Mr. Schoeman testifies that he didn't know if more information would have helped his analysis of Jur...
Mr. Schoeman testifies that he didn't know if more information would have helped his analysis of Juror No. 1's identity, but agrees that sharing a middle initial with another person of the same name makes it statistically more likely they are the same person.
deposition: 1:20-cv-03038-PAE Document 616-1 Filed 02/24/22 Page 73 of 117
Mr. Schoeman testifies that he didn't know if more information would have helped his analysis of Juror No. 1's identity, but agrees that sharing a middle initial with another person of the same name makes it statistically more likely they are the same person.
deposition transcript: 1:20-cv-13038
The witness, Schoeman, testifies about a conversation with Ms. Trzaskoma regarding Juror No. 1, discussing a person with the same name who was a disbarred lawyer. Trzaskoma assured Schoeman it was not the same person based on the voir dire process. No further discussion about Juror No. 1 occurred with Trzaskoma or anyone at the Brune firm during that time.
court transcript: A-5745
The document is a transcript of a court proceeding where a witness, Brune, is being questioned about a conversation regarding a suspension opinion and whether certain individuals were informed about it. The witness is unsure if Ms. Edelstein asked to see the suspension opinion, but confirms that Ms. Trzaskoma informed Mr. Schoeman and Mr. Berke about the issue on May 12th.
deposition transcript: A-5761
The deposition transcript discusses the voir dire process, jury consultants, and an investigation related to juror questionnaires. The witness is questioned about the involvement of specific individuals, including Mr. Donohue and Julie Blackman, as jury consultants. The court had expressed interest in understanding the process between the completion of juror questionnaires and the commencement of voir dire.
deposition transcript: A-5762
The witness, Brune, testifies about the Nardello firm's investigative work and its connection to Juror No. 1, and whether this information was disclosed to Judge Pauley during a conference call. Brune confirms that Nardello did jury research but claims that the details were laid out in their brief.
deposition transcript: A-5816
The document is a transcript of the direct examination of Mr. Schoeman, a lawyer at Kramer Levin, who represented Raymond Craig Brubaker in the trial of David Parse. Schoeman discusses his involvement in the trial and the role of his partner Barry Berke. He is questioned about a note from Juror No. 1, Catherine Conrad, read aloud by the Court on May 11, 2011.
deposition: A-5817
The witness, Schoeman, testifies about a note related to respondeat superior during the David Parse trial and reveals a personal friendship with Theresa Trzaskoma, the lawyer representing David Parse.
deposition: A-5818
The witness, Schoeman, testifies about a conversation with Ms. Trzaskoma regarding Juror No. 1, discussing a person with the same name who was a disbarred lawyer. The conversation occurred after the reading of a note from Juror No. 1. The witness and Ms. Trzaskoma concluded it was not the same person based on the voir dire questioning.
deposition: A-5819
Schoeman testifies about a conversation with Trzaskoma that occurred during jury deliberations, after a juror's note was received. He clarifies the timing and details of the conversation and follow-up questions he asked.
Deposition Transcript: A-5820
The document is a transcript of Schoeman's cross-examination, where they discuss their investigation techniques and their conversation with Trzaskoma about a potential connection between Juror No. 1 and a suspended attorney. Schoeman confirms that they didn't ask follow-up questions about Trzaskoma's initial belief. The testimony highlights the limited basis of Trzaskoma's concern, which was a shared name.
deposition: A-5821
The document is a deposition of Mr. Schoeman, a former Assistant U.S. Attorney, discussing his investigation into Juror No. 1. He was questioned about his actions and decisions regarding potentially relevant information about the juror's connection to a suspended attorney. Mr. Schoeman stated that he did not receive certain information from Theresa Trzaskoma and was uncertain about what he would have done if he had received it.
deposition: A-5822
The document is a deposition transcript where Mr. Schoeman is questioned about his analysis of Juror No. 1's identity and whether more information would have been helpful. He expresses uncertainty about the usefulness of additional information but agrees that sharing a middle initial makes it statistically more likely that two individuals with the same name are the same person.
court transcript: A-5823
The transcript captures the redirect examination of Mr. Schoeman, where he discusses a conversation with Ms. Trzaskoma regarding Juror No. 1's status as a suspended attorney. The court and attorneys explore the context and significance of this conversation. The witness is then excused, and the next witness, Barry Berke, is called.
This dossier on Mr. Schoeman was compiled from court records, flight logs, and public documents. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.