Theresa
Attorney involved in the juror selection process
Mentioned in 4 documents. Roles: Attorney involved in the juror selection process, Person who researched Catherine Conrad, attorney involved in the juror selection process, involved in researching Catherine Conrad
Theresa is mentioned in documents or reporting related to the Epstein case. Being mentioned does not imply any wrongdoing, criminal conduct, or inappropriate behavior.
At a Glance
Click values for sourcesSources
5 sources for document mentions
This document is a transcript of a court proceeding on February 15, 2012, featuring testimonies from...
“This document is a transcript of a court proceeding on February 15, 2012, featuring testimonies from”
court transcript: 1:20-cr-00338-PAE Document 16166320 Filed 02/24/22 Page 63 of 117
“The document appears to be a transcript of a court hearing or argument where an attorney is discussi”
Court Transcript: 1:20-cv-13003
“This document is a transcript of a court proceeding on February 15, 2012, featuring testimonies from”
Court Transcript Index: A-5670
“This is an index to a court transcript from the trial of Paul M. Daugerdas, detailing the examinatio”
deposition: A-5719
“The witness discusses a conversation about Catherine Conrad, a potential juror, and how the jury con”
Sources
1 source for known connections
Co-Document Mentions
“Named alongside other network members in 30 documents”
Known Connections (12)
Document Mentions (11)
This document is a transcript of a court proceeding on February 15, 2012, featuring testimonies from...
This document is a transcript of a court proceeding on February 15, 2012, featuring testimonies from Theresa Marie Trzaskoma and Catherine M. Conrad, with various attorneys conducting direct and cross-examinations, and a list of government and defense exhibits received into evidence.
court transcript: 1:20-cr-00338-PAE Document 16166320 Filed 02/24/22 Page 63 of 117
The document appears to be a transcript of a court hearing or argument where an attorney is discussing the strategic decisions made during juror selection, specifically regarding a juror with a 'checkered history'. The attorney argues that their decision was not a 'sandbagging' tactic, but rather a genuine change of heart after re-evaluating the juror's note.
Court Transcript: 1:20-cv-13003
This document is a transcript of a court proceeding on February 15, 2012, featuring testimonies from Theresa Marie Trzaskoma and Catherine M. Conrad, with various attorneys conducting direct and cross-examinations, and a list of government and defense exhibits received into evidence.
Court Transcript Index: A-5670
This is an index to a court transcript from the trial of Paul M. Daugerdas, detailing the examination of witnesses Theresa Marie Trzaskoma and Catherine M. Conrad, as well as the receipt of various government and defense exhibits.
deposition: A-5719
The witness discusses a conversation about Catherine Conrad, a potential juror, and how the jury consultant advised striking her due to her background as a recovering alcoholic. The witness also mentions that the potential juror's name matched that of a suspended lawyer, which was considered during the voir dire process.
transcript: A-5906
The transcript discusses a case where an attorney, Theresa, had second thoughts about a juror and investigated further, ultimately deciding to keep the juror. The discussion highlights the government's view that the decision was strategic and aimed at securing an acquittal.
deposition: Case 1:20-cr-00336-PAE Document 616-2 Filed 08/24/22 Page 34 of 130
The witness, Brune, discusses a conversation about Catherine Conrad, a potential juror, and how the jury consultant advised striking her due to her background as a recovering alcoholic. The conversation highlights the jury selection process and the factors considered when evaluating potential jurors. The document is part of a larger court filing in a criminal case.
Sparse email snippets mentioning world leaders and vague remarks
The messages contain no actionable information, specific transactions, dates, or relationships linking powerful actors to misconduct. They appear to be generic or nonsensical comments (e.g., underwear Mentions of Modi inauguration, Merkel, Macron, and a possible resignation of a 'Theresa' figure. No concrete details, dates, or evidence of wrongdoing. Sender email appears unrelated to any known inv
Ivanka Trump’s G20 seating and White House crisis management amid looming Trump Tower meeting story
The passage details internal White House dynamics during a critical moment when the administration was preparing a response to a Times story about the Trump Tower meeting. It names several senior offi Ivanka Trump sat between Xi Jinping and Theresa May at the G20, indicating high‑level diplomatic exp White House staff were excluded from crisis discussions on Air Force One, with Hope Hicks taking l
Deposition Errata Sheet and Notary Certification – No Substantive Content
The document consists solely of formatting placeholders, signatures, and certification statements for a deposition transcript. It contains no names, transactions, dates of events, or allegations that Only identifies Paul G. Cassell (deposition solutions) and Theresa Tomaselli (notary/reporter). Dated October 2015, Florida Broward County. No mention of any parties, subjects, or substantive testimo
Economic outlook report linking Brexit costs to UK borrowing and debt
The passage provides macroeconomic forecasts and estimates of Brexit-related borrowing but contains no specific allegations, actors, transactions, or actionable investigative leads involving high‑prof Brexit estimated to add £59 bn to UK borrowing by 2022 (~£200 m per week). UK OBR forecasts slowing GDP growth and rising public sector net debt. References to Theresa May’s election and Bank of Engl
Email Mentions (1)
This dossier on Theresa was compiled from court records, flight logs, and public documents. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.