defendants
the defendant in the current case, whose identity is not specified
Mentioned in 8 documents. Roles: the defendant in the current case, whose identity is not specified, the individual whose motion for release is being considered, the individual being considered for detention, the individual whose release is being contested, recipient of legal mail
defendants is mentioned in documents or reporting related to the Epstein case. Being mentioned does not imply any wrongdoing, criminal conduct, or inappropriate behavior.
At a Glance
Click values for sourcesSources
5 sources for document mentions
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell [EFTA00008716]
2025-12-19
“United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell June 29, 2020 Grand Jury Presentation GM_GLSDNY_00000103 GM_GJ_SD”
Attorney discusses appellate arguments in Boston doctors‑nurse rape case
2025-11-11
“The passage recounts a specific criminal case involving medical professionals and a nurse, but it co”
Email chain forwarding a Reuters lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein (April 2016)
2025-11-11
“The passage merely confirms that a Reuters‑related lawsuit was being circulated among lawyers in Apr”
Plaintiffs seek damages over business reputation loss from defendants Tyler McDonald d/b/a Yi.Org
2025-11-11
“The filing is a routine civil suit seeking modest damages (>$15,000) for alleged reputational harm. ”
Plaintiffs seek to unseal court filings alleging sexual abuse by Alan Dershowitz in Virginia Giuffre defamation case
2025-11-11
“The passage reveals a motion to keep certain filings confidential that contain allegations of sexual”
Sources
1 source for known connections
Co-Document Mentions
“Named alongside other network members in 234 documents”
Known Connections (41)
Document Mentions (131)
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell [EFTA00008716]
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell June 29, 2020 Grand Jury Presentation GM_GLSDNY_00000103 GM_GJ_SDNY_00000104 9 East 71st Street, New York, New York GM_GLSDNY_000001 05 358 El Brillo Wa , Palm Beach, Florida GM_GUON,O00O01. 49 Zorro Ranch Road, Stanley, New Mexico GM_GLSDNY_00000107 GM_GLSDNY_0...
Attorney discusses appellate arguments in Boston doctors‑nurse rape case
The passage recounts a specific criminal case involving medical professionals and a nurse, but it contains no new evidence, financial transactions, or links to high‑level officials or institutions. It Case involved three doctors and a nurse accused of non‑consensual sex at a vacation home. Defendants were convicted and sentenced to six months despite claims of consent. Appellate court declined to
Email chain forwarding a Reuters lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein (April 2016)
The passage merely confirms that a Reuters‑related lawsuit was being circulated among lawyers in April 2016. It provides no new factual details, names of defendants beyond Epstein, transaction data, o Lawyers Alan Dershowitz, Roy Black, and Jack Goldberger were discussing a Reuters lawsuit against Je The email chain includes a forwarded message from David Ingram at Reuters attaching the suit. Date
Plaintiffs seek damages over business reputation loss from defendants Tyler McDonald d/b/a Yi.Org
The filing is a routine civil suit seeking modest damages (>$15,000) for alleged reputational harm. It involves no high‑profile individuals, government agencies, or novel allegations, offering little Plaintiffs allege reputational damage caused by Tyler McDonald operating as Yi.Org. Requested relief includes damages exceeding $15,000 and a jury trial. Attorney for plaintiffs is Joe Titone, Florid
Plaintiffs seek to unseal court filings alleging sexual abuse by Alan Dershowitz in Virginia Giuffre defamation case
The passage reveals a motion to keep certain filings confidential that contain allegations of sexual abuse by a high‑profile attorney, Alan Dershowitz, on behalf of Virginia Giuffre. While it identifi Defendants Bradley J. Edwards and Paul G. Cassell filed a response to Dershowitz’s motion to keep re The contested records are three filings that recount Virginia Giuffre’s allegations of sexual abus
Allegations of Threats and Duress by Wealthy Defendants Including Donald Trump in Sexual Abuse Lawsuit
The passage alleges that a defendant identified as Trump threatened a sexual assault plaintiff with death, invoking duress to toll the statute of limitations. If true, this ties a former president to Plaintiff claims she was threatened with death by each defendant to silence her. Defendant identified as "Trump" allegedly warned the plaintiff not to speak or she would "disappear The alleged threa
Voluntary Dismissal Notice in Doe v. Trump et al (1:16‑cv‑07673‑RA) forwarded in privileged email chain
The passage reveals that a lawsuit against Donald Trump and unnamed co‑defendants was voluntarily dismissed on Nov 4, 2016. While it confirms the existence of litigation and the involvement of a law f Court filing shows a case titled Doe v. Trump et al was voluntarily dismissed on 11/4/2016. The filing was entered by attorney Thomas Meagher and notified to Michael C. Miller of Steptoe & Joh The pl
Doe v. Trump et al – Civil docket filing for assault, libel & slander case
The document is a routine docket entry showing that a plaintiff filed a civil suit against Donald J. Trump and Jeffrey Epstein. It contains no substantive allegations, evidence, financial transactions Case filed on 06/20/2016 in SDNY, assigned to Judge Ronnie Abrams. Plaintiff uses the pseudonym Jane Doe; represented by Thomas F. Meagher. Defendants listed: Donald J. Trump and Jeffrey E. Epstein.
Civil rights lawsuit alleges Donald J. Trump and Jeffrey E. Epstein sexually abused minor Katie Johnson in 1994
The passage provides a specific complaint naming Trump and Epstein as defendants in a civil rights suit alleging underage sexual abuse. It offers concrete allegations, dates, and victim details, which Plaintiff Katie Johnson files suit in federal court (Case 5:16‑cv‑00797‑DMG‑KS). Alleges Trump and Epstein abused her sexually from June‑September 1994 when she was 13. Claims abuse involved forced m
Attorney for Epstein victims: 'I've never seen a stranger case' – non‑prosecution deal raises questions
The passage reveals a sealed federal non‑prosecution agreement that granted immunity to Jeffrey Epstein and several co‑defendants in exchange for a short state jail term. While the existence of the de Federal non‑prosecution agreement sealed for Epstein and four co‑defendants. Immunity granted despite potential life‑sentence offenses. Victims were not consulted on the deal.
Proposed Amendments to Federal Rules to Require Victim Input on Case Transfers
The passage outlines procedural proposals for victim participation in case transfer decisions. It does not name any influential actors, financial flows, or misconduct, offering only low‑value context Suggests amending Rule 18, 20, and 21 to require victim consultation before transferring prosecution Calls for written consent from defendants and approval from U.S. attorneys in both districts. Mand
Ken Starr to handle appeal of billion‑dollar J&J verdict, cites “good friends on both sides”
The email suggests a former high‑profile attorney (Ken Starr) is personally involved in an appeal of a massive J&J jury verdict, hinting at possible insider connections (“good friends on both sides”). Ken Starr indicates he will handle the appeal of a billion‑dollar J&J jury verdict. Mentions “good friends on both sides,” implying personal connections to plaintiffs and defendants. Email dated Dec
Complaint alleges sexual abuse and civil rights conspiracy by Donald J. Trump and Jeffrey E. Epstein
The document is a filing of a pro se plaintiff alleging abuse by Trump and Epstein, but provides no specific facts, dates, transactions, or evidence beyond the accusations. It suggests a possible lead Plaintiff Katie Johnson files a civil complaint in California federal court. Defendants named are former President Donald J. Trump and financier Jeffrey E. Epstein. Claims include sexual abuse under
Judicial and Prosecutorial Cynicism: Internal Rules of the Justice System
The passage offers a cynical internal perspective on how judges, prosecutors, and police operate, but provides no specific names, dates, transactions, or actionable leads. It is largely opinionated an Claims that most criminal defendants are guilty. Allegations that judges and prosecutors are aware of police lying. Assertion that constitutional violations are used to secure convictions.
Court Order Scheduling Initial Conference in Jane Doe v. Donald J. Trump & Jeffrey E. Epstein (SDNY)
The document is a routine docket order setting a status conference and outlining procedural requirements. It confirms that a civil case involving a pseudonymous plaintiff against Trump and Epstein was Case number 1:16‑cv‑07673‑RA filed in Southern District of New York. Plaintiff is a Jane Doe using a pseudonym. Defendants listed are Donald J. Trump and Jeffrey E. Epstein.
Showing 15 of 131 documents. View all →
Email Mentions (19)
Activity in Case 1:16-cv-07673-RA Doe v. Trump et al Notice of Voluntary Dismissal
This is an automatic e-mail message generated by the CM/ECF system. Please DO NOT RESPOND to this e-mail because the mail box is unattended. *** NOTE
Activity in Case 1:16-cv-07673-RA Doe v. Trump et al Notice of Voluntary Dismissal
This is an automatic e-mail message generated by the CM/ECF system. Please DO NOT RESPOND to this e-mail because the mail box is unattended. ***NOTE
Activity in Case 1:16-cv-07673-RA Doe v. Trump et al Notice of Voluntary Dismissal
This is an automatic e-mail message generated by the CM/ECF system. Please DO NOT RESPOND to this e-mail because the mail box is unattended. *** NOTE
Re: told you , the case ws a fake
The following transaction was entered by Meagher, Thomas on 11/4/2016 at 5:59 PM EDT and filed on 11/4/2016 Case Name: Doe v. Trump et al Case Numbe
Re:
Here goes: "Sweetheart deal! " So goes the critique of the resolution of a long-ago case involving our former client -- and now-friend -- Jeffrey Eps
JE
From: NYSD_ ECF Pool@nysd.uscourts.gov [mailto:NYSD ECF Pool@nysd.uscourts.gov] Sent: Friday, November 04, 2016 5:59 PM To: CourtMail@nysd.uscourts.g
Activity in Case 1:16-cv-07673-RA Doe v. Trump et al Notice of Voluntary Dismissal
This is an automatic e-mail message generated by the CM/ECF system. Please DO NOT RESPOND to this e-mail because the mail box is unattended. *** NOTE
Re: told you , the case ws a fake
The following transaction was entered by Meagher, Thomas on 11/4/2016 at 5:59 PM EDT and filed on 11/4/2016 Case Name: Doe v. Trump et al Case Numbe
Activity in Case 1:16-cv-07673-RA Doe v. Trump et al Notice of Voluntary Dismissal
This is an automatic e-mail message generated by the CM/ECF system. Please DO NOT RESPOND to this e-mail because the mail box is unattended. ***NOTE
Re: told you , the case ws a fake
The following transaction was entered by Meagher, Thomas on 11/4/2016 at 5:59 PM EDT and filed on 11/4/2016 Case Name: Doe v. Trump et al Case Numbe
Showing 10 of 19 emails. View all →
This dossier on defendants was compiled from court records, flight logs, and public documents. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.