Witnesses linked to Jeffrey Epstein's sex trafficking case invoke Fifth Amendment and were covered by unusual non‑prosecution agreements

Oo O DN OO FF WwW NY =| NO RO PO PNP NM NO | S| S| HS SF S| S| S| S| S| non BP WO NO -|- ODO OO WDN OO OT BP WO NYO — 74 But what I discovered there was that when sarah Kellen was asked about Alan Dershowitz, she took the Fifth and she wasn't the only one. There was Miss Mucinska who also took the Fifth when asked questions about Alan Dershowitz. And then there was Marcin -- Miss Marcinkova who also took the Fifth. So what we -- what I had at this point was Jeffrey Epstein's international sex trafficking organization. I had the next echelon and both the top kingpin of the sex trafficking organization and the next echelon had taken the Fifth, had refused to answer questions about Alan Dershowitz. And so at that point, I was drawing an adverse inference, not just from one person, but from four persons and that adverse inference was being strengthened by the surrounding circumstances, some of which we have already talked about. One of the things that really bolstered the adverse inference that I was drawing in this case was that I've mentioned those three girls, Kellen, Mucinska, and Marcinkova, they were all covered by a nonprosecution agreement. And the nonprosecution agreement was highly unusual . I had been a federal prosecutor for about four years, I had been a federal judge for about ROUGH DRAFT ONLY HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021897