Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-29535House OversightDeposition

Testimony hints at Jeffrey Epstein arranging a New York trip with Ghislaine Maxwell involvement

The excerpt provides a vague reference to a conversation where 'Jeffrey' (likely Jeffrey Epstein) offers to take the witness to New York and mentions a passport, with a question about Ghislaine's invo Witness recounts a call from 'Jeffrey' offering travel to New York. Questioner asks about Ghislaine's involvement, implying possible coordination. Reference to passport request suggests pre‑travel lo

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #014290
Pages
1
Persons
2
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The excerpt provides a vague reference to a conversation where 'Jeffrey' (likely Jeffrey Epstein) offers to take the witness to New York and mentions a passport, with a question about Ghislaine's invo Witness recounts a call from 'Jeffrey' offering travel to New York. Questioner asks about Ghislaine's involvement, implying possible coordination. Reference to passport request suggests pre‑travel lo

Persons Referenced (2)

Tags

jeffrey-epsteinpotential-sexual-misconductpotential-misconductforeign-influenceghislaine-maxwelltravel-logisticslegal-exposurehouse-oversightlegal-testimony

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit
Review This Document

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Page 76 A. Just flying over it. Q. When you said they called, do you know who called your roommate? A. I don't know who called my roommate. Q. In this sort of pre-trip to New York period, do you recall discussing any of the particulars of your massages with Jeffrey, with Ghislaine? MS. McCAWLEY: Objection. BY MS. MENNINGER: Os If that makes sense. A. No. Q. So before you got this call, had anyone mentioned the idea of traveling to you? A. No. Did you call Jeffrey immediately? Q A. I did. Q And what conversation did you have with A. Basically he said, I want to take you to -- to New York City. Can you be here quickly? And I got to the house, and he said, Do you have your passport? I said, No. He said, Go get it. MAGNA® LEGAL SERVICES

Related Documents (6)

House OversightApr 9, 2019

Empty Exhibit Provides No Investigative Leads

Empty Exhibit Provides No Investigative Leads The document contains only a title and no substantive content, offering no names, dates, transactions, or allegations to pursue. It lacks any actionable information, controversy, novelty, or linkage to powerful actors. Key insights: Document consists solely of a header and exhibit label.; No factual statements, allegations, or references to individuals or entities are present.

1p
House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

Court Transcript Reveals Potential Undisclosed Evidence and High‑Profile Connections in Giuffre v. Maxwell Defamation Case

The transcript contains several concrete references that could be pursued for investigative value: attempts to depose former President Bill Clinton; FOIA requests and alleged FBI involvement (Louie Fr Plaintiff’s counsel sought to depose Bill Clinton to establish his relationship with Epstein. Reference to former FBI Director Louis Freeh as an expert witness without a Rule 26 disclosure. Discussio

138p
House OversightMar 20, 2017

Court filings reveal alleged links between Jeffrey Epstein’s sex‑trafficking network and high‑profile figures including Prince Andrew and Alan Dershowitz

Court filings reveal alleged links between Jeffrey Epstein’s sex‑trafficking network and high‑profile figures including Prince Andrew and Alan Dershowitz The documents contain multiple sworn statements, media excerpts, and court orders that reference alleged sexual encounters between [REDACTED - Survivor] (Jane Doe 3) and Prince Andrew, as well as accusations against Alan Dershowitz. While many of the claims have been publicly reported, the filing includes sealed exhibits and specific procedural motions (Rule 21/15) that could provide new evidentiary leads, such as the referenced sealed documents and the alleged list of other powerful individuals (politicians, business executives, foreign leaders). The presence of a judge’s order striking certain allegations and the detailed procedural history suggest actionable avenues for further discovery and verification. Key insights: Exhibits list media articles linking Prince Andrew and Dershowitz to alleged sexual abuse of a minor.; Court order strikes detailed allegations but preserves the right of Jane Doe 3 to reassert them with proper evidence.; Reference to a “list of numerous prominent American politicians, powerful business executives, foreign presidents, a well‑known Prime Minister, and other world leaders” in the Rule 21 motion.

1p
House OversightMay 25, 2017

Virginia L. Giuffre v. Ghislaine Maxwell – Oral Argument Docket (Southern District of New York, March 31, 2017)

Virginia L. Giuffre v. Ghislaine Maxwell – Oral Argument Docket (Southern District of New York, March 31, 2017) The document is a routine court docket listing parties, counsel, and judge for an oral argument. It contains no substantive allegations, financial details, or connections to powerful actors beyond the already public parties. As such, it offers no actionable investigative leads. Key insights: Case number: 15 Civ. 7433 (RWS); Judge: Hon. Robert W. Sweet; Plaintiff: Virginia L. Giuffre

1p
House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

[REDACTED - Survivor] v. Alan Dershowitz – Allegations of Sex Trafficking, NPA Manipulation, and Defamation

The complaint provides a dense web of alleged connections between Alan Dershowitz, Jeffrey Epstein, former U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta, and the 2008 non‑prosecution agreement (NPA). It cites specif Roberts alleges she was trafficked by Epstein from 2000‑2002 and forced to have sex with Dershowitz. Dershowitz is accused of helping draft and pressure the government into the 2008 NPA that shielded

87p
House OversightDepositionNov 11, 2025

Letter alleges confidential deposition leaks in Giuffre v. Maxwell case, citing alleged emails about Russian hack, CIA involvement, and sexual misc...

The document provides a concrete allegation that plaintiff's counsel leaked sealed deposition material to the Washington Post, referencing alleged emails that claim Russian and CIA involvement and inc Plaintiff's counsel allegedly provided Washington Post with confidential deposition excerpts. Alleged emails claim Russian hackers, CIA, and Hillary Clinton’s “Special Agents Forces Men” were in Clai

3p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Support This ProjectSupported by 1,550+ people worldwide
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.