Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00215303DOJ Data Set 9

(USAFLS)"

Other

From: (USAFLS)" To: ' " aa> Subject: RE: Follow up Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 13:55:47 +0000 Importance: Normal Sony, Jay. I just got this and have to run off to the hospital. I will revise and re-email you tomorrow or late tonight. Original Message From: Jay Lefkowitz [mailto: Sent: Frida , Se tember 14, 2007 9:40 AM To: . (USAFLS) Subject: Follow up Confidential - thanks vent much for speaking this am. Have conferred with my client and I think we are on the same page. When you send me your draft today, would you please also include a paragraph with 403 in lieu of 1512. I want to understand better how you would characterize the 403 violation. (What was actually said?). I want to keep studying that avenue today as well. The other possible option is to charge three 113s. Also, one other idea. Can you look at 47 use 227(b), which is another 6 month statute which might work for the 6 months. We could do three of them, and they seem to fit the facts well. I will c

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00215303
Pages
2
Persons
1
Integrity
Loading document viewer...

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit
Review This Document

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Support This ProjectSupported by 1,550+ people worldwide
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.