Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta01683600DOJ Data Set 10Correspondence

EFTA Document EFTA01683600

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 10
Reference
efta-efta01683600
Pages
0
Persons
0
Integrity
Loading PDF viewer...

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit
Review This Document

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Overall Classification Overall Classification: SECRET//N0F0RN Derived From: Multiple Sources Declassify On: 20451231 Additional Case: 50D NY-3027571 O Serial Number: 539 Case Title: (U) EPSTEIN, JEFFREY; CHILD SEX TRAFFICKING Serialized: 11/09/2020 I; I Document Title: Document Synopsis: (S//NF effery Epstein Special. (S//NF effery Epstein Special. Details: ( ) New were selected to dence from four devices that a ectly involved with Jeffery Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell child sex trafficking case. The f the case fell outside of the normal parameters of the workload, but due to the experience and maturity level SSs selected, the data reviewe rocessed would have little or no effect, nor hamper squad_abilities to provide accurate, reliable, and relev vice to the customer squad. (U//FOUO) With the objectives set by Special Agent (SA) of C-20, SSs were to review four devices for responsive documents, and label/bookmark material/s for evidence 1/3 EFTA01683600 3/5/25.8:10 AM Sedals collection for review by the Assistant United States Attorney Office (AUSA) and meet the discovery deadline of November 9, 2020. The protocol established by the Warrant, was for each SS to review the search warrant and accompanying affidavit pursuant to which the materials were produced or seized. Then each member of the review team was assigned to conduct a file- by-file review of the images and videos from a particular subset of the devices. Files falling into any of the following categories shall be considered responsive to the Warrant: • Any image or video of Jeffrey Epstein • Any image or video of Ghislaine Maxwell • Any image or video of any female appearing to be under the age of 30 • Any travel documents, such as passports, visas, or immigration forms • Any screenshots of communications with or regarding females • Any screenshots of social media posts featuring or regarding females (U//FOUO) Upon identifying any file that falls within one of the above categories, the reviewer shall take the following steps: • If the image or video contains partial or full nudity, mark the file RESPONSIVE - HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL • If the image contains no nudity of any kind, mark the file RESPONSIVE - CONFIDENTIAL (U//FOUO) The four machines assigned and reviewed by SSs are as follows: - 524,774 files reviewed - 939,427 files reviewed - 486,154 files reviewed - 567,262 files reviewed (U//FOLIO) Due to SSs abilities to conduct themselves in a professional ma d to remain focused on the mission, we were able to process an enormous amount o in a relatively short amount of time, thus allowing squad to deliver evidence to the AUSA before the aforement discovery deadline. Indexing 2/3 EFTA01683601 3,5,25 810AM Serials Display Name Enterprise Role Entity Role Entity Type US Person 33 EFTA01683602

Related Documents (6)

House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

Epstein Reputation Management Email Reveals Paid SEO/Hacking Campaign to Suppress Negative Coverage

The email provides concrete details about a paid operation to manipulate search results for Jeffrey Epstein, including payments, specific tactics, and references to high‑profile associates. It suggest Epstein hired a contractor (Mike) for $2,500 plus a pending $7,500 to run SEO and hacking services. The operation involved removing negative articles, altering Wikipedia, replacing mug‑shot images, a

3p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Anecdotal recollections linking Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, Prince Andrew, and high‑profile financiers

The passage offers personal impressions and vague connections but provides no concrete evidence, dates, transactions, or actionable leads. It mentions well‑known figures, but only in a speculative, go Author claims to have met Epstein and Maxwell at parties and describes their behavior. Mentions Prince Andrew walking with Epstein and suggests a possible business‑related motive. References financie

2p
Dept. of JusticeDec 19, 2025

GRAND JURY [EFTA00008998]

GRAND JURY EXHIBIT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES OF AMERICA SUPERSEDING INDICTMENT GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. S1 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) COUNT ONE (Conspiracy to Entice Minors to Travel to Engage in Illegal Sex Acts) The Grand Jury charges: OVERVIEW The char...

1p
Financial RecordUnknown

Invoice Number: 4.013-86582

DOJ EFTA Data Set 10 document EFTA01313161

9p
Dept. of JusticeOtherUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01297934

"Darren Indyke" AND allegation OR arrest OR bribe OR convict OR corrupt OR court O... Page 1 of 2 Goggle *Clew IndyMC AND elligetton OR east OR bribe OR convict CR corrupt OR O All News 'arcs I,na9pn Maps Mtn - con /}n' ,y-. 12 resettle :0 2 roorde; Exclusive: New York attorney general seeks information on financier ... vAwr refort.CCWAIrtele2CISC0MtnagnIcinl.:^areynUSKBN0M2D0V2C15DXS Mos . North Korea Cnannes &Kew ror.ed Epstein's Lawyer Darren Indyke to cup*n why Easter(' foun

2p
House OversightUnknown

Document alleges extensive financial, academic, and sexual ties between Jeffrey Epstein, Alan Dershowitz, and high‑profile figures including Leslie Wexner, Harvard officials, and political elites

Document alleges extensive financial, academic, and sexual ties between Jeffrey Epstein, Alan Dershowitz, and high‑profile figures including Leslie Wexner, Harvard officials, and political elites The passage provides numerous specific allegations – dates, dollar amounts, meetings, and alleged quid‑pro quo arrangements – that could be pursued for evidence of financial flows, abuse of influence, and coordinated legal obstruction. It implicates powerful actors (Wexner, Harvard leadership, a U.S. state attorney, and potentially members of the British royal family) and suggests systematic surveillance and intimidation of investigators. While many claims are unverified and some are repetitive, the level of detail (e.g., $30 M investment, $1 mansion sale, non‑prosecution agreement clause protecting co‑conspirators) makes it a strong investigative lead. Key insights: 1996 meeting on Epstein’s jet linking Dershowitz to Leslie Wexner’s birthday party.; Epstein’s claim that Wexner sold a Manhattan mansion to him for $1.; 1997 $30 M investment in Boston Provident allegedly sourced from Wexner, with half‑million from Dershowitz.

1p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Support This ProjectSupported by 1,550+ people worldwide
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.