Duplicate Document
This document appears to be a copy. The original version is:
Deposition excerpt involving Alan Dershowitz, David Boies and disputed privileged settlement discussionsDeposition excerpt involving Alan Dershowitz, David Boies and disputed privileged settlement discussions
Deposition excerpt involving Alan Dershowitz, David Boies and disputed privileged settlement discussions The passage references high‑profile attorneys (Dershowitz, Boies) and a possible privileged settlement discussion related to the Giuffre affidavit, but provides no concrete details about transactions, dates, or wrongdoing. It hints at a dispute over confidentiality that could merit follow‑up, yet lacks actionable specifics or novel revelations about powerful political actors. Key insights: Alan Dershowicz was deposed on Oct. 15, 2015 and Oct. 16, 2016.; David Boies’ law partner, Ms. McCawley, issued a statement claiming Dershowicz misrepresented discussions.; The discussions are described as "expressly privileged settlement discussions" and are not disclosed.
Summary
Deposition excerpt involving Alan Dershowitz, David Boies and disputed privileged settlement discussions The passage references high‑profile attorneys (Dershowitz, Boies) and a possible privileged settlement discussion related to the Giuffre affidavit, but provides no concrete details about transactions, dates, or wrongdoing. It hints at a dispute over confidentiality that could merit follow‑up, yet lacks actionable specifics or novel revelations about powerful political actors. Key insights: Alan Dershowicz was deposed on Oct. 15, 2015 and Oct. 16, 2016.; David Boies’ law partner, Ms. McCawley, issued a statement claiming Dershowicz misrepresented discussions.; The discussions are described as "expressly privileged settlement discussions" and are not disclosed.
Persons Referenced (10)
“again. I'm not going to THE WITNESS: No, no, no. Does she have standing in this deposition? MR. SCOTT:”
Sigrid McCawley“nfidentiality of Court Records Page 13 of 20 MS. McCAWLEY: I have a standing objection and, I’m objecting a”
Jack Scarola“THE WITNESS: I’m not sure she has standing. MR. SCAROLA: Are we finished with the speech? MR. SCOTT: No.”
Wafic Said“t least at this time, describe what was actually said. However, Mr. Boies does state that Mr. HOUSE_OV”
Larry Page“ion to Determine Confidentiality of Court Records Page 13 of 20 MS. McCAWLEY: I have a standing objecti”
Bradley Edwards“Edwards, Bradley vs. Dershowitz Case No.: CACE 15-000072 Edwards”
Virginia Giuffre“as Exhibit 2) (also containing discussion of Ms. Giuffre’s affidavit). The Court should be aware that with”
David Boies“mately two hours of this exchange, Ms. McCawley. (David Boies’ law partner) released a statement on his behalf,”
Scotty David“mately two hours of this exchange, Ms. McCawley. (David Boies’ law partner) released a statement on his b”
Alan Dershowitz“she wants to. MR. SCOTT: Exactly. Deposition of Alan Dershowitz (Oct. 15, 2015) at 93-95 (attached as Exhibit 1);”
Tags
Ask AI About This Document
Extracted Text (OCR)
Related Documents (6)
Empty Exhibit Provides No Investigative Leads
Empty Exhibit Provides No Investigative Leads The document contains only a title and no substantive content, offering no names, dates, transactions, or allegations to pursue. It lacks any actionable information, controversy, novelty, or linkage to powerful actors. Key insights: Document consists solely of a header and exhibit label.; No factual statements, allegations, or references to individuals or entities are present.
Dershowitz claims oral‑sex allegation against him is confidential in Edwards v. Dershowitz case
The passage reveals a disputed claim that Alan Dershowitz was named in connection with Jeffrey Epstein’s abuse of minors and that an oral‑sex allegation is being treated as confidential. It identifies Dershowitz is seeking to keep an oral‑sex allegation confidential in a court filing. He denies any knowledge of or witness to Jeffrey Epstein’s abuse, specifically referencing Virginia The dispute c
Deposition excerpt involving Alan Dershowitz, David Boies and disputed confidentiality objections
Deposition excerpt involving Alan Dershowitz, David Boies and disputed confidentiality objections The passage references a deposition where Alan Dershowitz is questioned and mentions David Boies' law partner asserting privileged settlement discussions. While it hints at possible privileged communications and a dispute over confidentiality, it provides no concrete details about wrongdoing, financial flows, or high‑level officials beyond well‑known attorneys. The lead is vague, lacks actionable specifics, and does not introduce novel allegations, limiting its investigative value. Key insights: Alan Dershowitz was deposed on Oct. 15, 2015 (and again Oct. 16, 2016).; A dispute arose over whether a witness had standing to object to disclosure.; David Boies' law partner, Ms. McCawley, issued a statement claiming privileged settlement discussions with Dershowitz.
Court filings reveal alleged links between Jeffrey Epstein’s sex‑trafficking network and high‑profile figures including Prince Andrew and Alan Dershowitz
Court filings reveal alleged links between Jeffrey Epstein’s sex‑trafficking network and high‑profile figures including Prince Andrew and Alan Dershowitz The documents contain multiple sworn statements, media excerpts, and court orders that reference alleged sexual encounters between [REDACTED - Survivor] (Jane Doe 3) and Prince Andrew, as well as accusations against Alan Dershowitz. While many of the claims have been publicly reported, the filing includes sealed exhibits and specific procedural motions (Rule 21/15) that could provide new evidentiary leads, such as the referenced sealed documents and the alleged list of other powerful individuals (politicians, business executives, foreign leaders). The presence of a judge’s order striking certain allegations and the detailed procedural history suggest actionable avenues for further discovery and verification. Key insights: Exhibits list media articles linking Prince Andrew and Dershowitz to alleged sexual abuse of a minor.; Court order strikes detailed allegations but preserves the right of Jane Doe 3 to reassert them with proper evidence.; Reference to a “list of numerous prominent American politicians, powerful business executives, foreign presidents, a well‑known Prime Minister, and other world leaders” in the Rule 21 motion.
[REDACTED - Survivor] v. Alan Dershowitz – Allegations of Sex Trafficking, NPA Manipulation, and Defamation
The complaint provides a dense web of alleged connections between Alan Dershowitz, Jeffrey Epstein, former U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta, and the 2008 non‑prosecution agreement (NPA). It cites specif Roberts alleges she was trafficked by Epstein from 2000‑2002 and forced to have sex with Dershowitz. Dershowitz is accused of helping draft and pressure the government into the 2008 NPA that shielded
Deposition of Prof. Paul Cassell alleges Alan Dershowitz’s involvement in Jeffrey Epstein sex‑trafficking and possible concealment of evidence
The transcript contains multiple specific allegations linking a high‑profile attorney (Alan Dershowitz) to Jeffrey Epstein’s sex‑trafficking network, references to flight logs, a ‘black book’, a non‑p Cassell claims the pleading alleges Dershowitz abused [REDACTED - Survivor] and “other minors” based on a He asserts that Epstein repeatedly invoked the Fifth Amendment when questioned about Dershowitz, s
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.