1 duplicate copy in the archive
efta-efta01379187
EFTA Document EFTA01379187
O • 0 zz T 5 5 Jane Doe No 103 v. Epstein 9:10cv80309 m m zz > > r r- Fax: Email: -o DEFENDANT ATTORNEY(S): Pike, Michael James [COR LD NTC] Burman Critton Luttier & Coleman 303 Banyan Boulevard Suite 400 -n West Palm Beach, FL A 33401-2918 Fax: Email: (-) THE COURT UPDATED THIS RECORD ON: 05/19/2010 1200:00 AM rn CD z0 rn cp c 0z . 0. 0 Ni IV 0) Ot (71 C.0 —I, 0) D..) AI3R Research Profik modified 6' l21-2007 For internal u'c onl‘ Page 4 Last EFTA01379187
Summary
O • 0 zz T 5 5 Jane Doe No 103 v. Epstein 9:10cv80309 m m zz > > r r- Fax: Email: -o DEFENDANT ATTORNEY(S): Pike, Michael James [COR LD NTC] Burman Critton Luttier & Coleman 303 Banyan Boulevard Suite 400 -n West Palm Beach, FL A 33401-2918 Fax: Email: (-) THE COURT UPDATED THIS RECORD ON: 05/19/2010 1200:00 AM rn CD z0 rn cp c 0z . 0. 0 Ni IV 0) Ot (71 C.0 —I, 0) D..) AI3R Research Profik modified 6' l21-2007 For internal u'c onl‘ Page 4 Last EFTA01379187
Ask AI About This Document
Extracted Text (OCR)
Technical Artifacts (2)
View in Artifacts BrowserEmail addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.
9:10CV80309401-2918Related Documents (6)
EFTA Document EFTA01355618
O• 0 zz m 5 5 Jane Doe No 103 v. Epstein 9:10cv80309 m m zz r• > r- -o C DEFENDANT ATTORNEY(S): Pike, Michael James [COR LD NTC] Burman Critton Luttier & Coleman 303 Banyan Boulevard Suite 400 -n West Palm Beach. FL. USA 33401-2918 THE COURT UPDATED THIS RECORD ON: 05/19/2010 12 00 00 AM rn CD z0 rn cp 0 • Z I -< 0 AI3R Research Profik Page 4 lost C) --J 0 CO C.) CO 2.• 0 modified 6' l21-2007 For infernal the onl% EFTA01355618
EFTA Document EFTA01381981
O • 0 zz T 5 5 Jane Doe No 103 v. Epstein 9:10cv80309 m m zz > > r r- Fax: -o x• DEFENDANT ATTORNEY(S): Pike, Michael James [COR LD NTC] Burman Critton Luttier & Coleman 303 Banyan Boulevard Suite 400 -n West Palm Beach, FL. USA 33401-2918 Fax Email: (-) THE COURT UPDATED THIS RECORD ON: 05/19/2010 12 00 00 AM rn CD z0 rn cp 3z NO N --J CO CO CO W AI3R Research Prolik modified 6 I R20u7 For internal ac only Page 4 Last EFTA01381981
EFTA Document EFTA01377941
Page 5 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 139535, * For Defendant (9:09-cv-80469-KAM): Bruce Reinhart, LEAD ATTORNEY, Bruce . ein art, P.A., West Palm Beach, FL; Denise Kalland, Denise Kalland, P.A., West Palm Beach, FL. For Jane Doe No. 101, Plaintiff (9:09-cv-80591-KAM): Katherine Warthen Ezell, LEAD ATTORNEY, Podhurst Orseck Josefsberg et al, Miami, FL USA; Robert C. Josefsberg, LEAD ATTORNEY, Podhurst Orseck, P.A., Miami, FL USA. For Jeffrey Epstein, Defendant (9:09-cv-80591-KAM): Michael James
Bradley Edwards’ Opposition to Jeffrey Epstein’s Summary Judgment Motion – Claims of Abuse of Process, Witness Tampering, and Links to High‑Profile Figures
Bradley Edwards’ Opposition to Jeffrey Epstein’s Summary Judgment Motion – Claims of Abuse of Process, Witness Tampering, and Links to High‑Profile Figures The filing enumerates numerous specific leads that, if verified, tie Jeffrey Epstein to a wide network of powerful individuals (Donald Trump, Bill Clinton, Alan Dershowitz, Ghislaine Maxwell, etc.) and to alleged obstruction of federal investigations, witness intimidation, and a non‑prosecution agreement. It also references concrete documents (exhibits, deposition excerpts, flight logs, FBI emails) that could be pursued for forensic analysis, discovery requests, or FOIA requests. The combination of high‑profile actors, alleged criminal conduct, and detailed procedural allegations makes this a strong investigative lead. Key insights: Edwards alleges Epstein invoked the Fifth Amendment to avoid answering substantive questions, creating adverse inferences.; The motion cites a “Holy Grail” journal allegedly listing underage victims and high‑profile contacts (Trump, Clinton, etc.).; Claims that Epstein’s attorneys (including Alan Dershowitz) may have helped suppress victim testimony and influence the U.S. Attorney’s Office.
Sparse House Oversight Document Lacks Substantive Content
Sparse House Oversight Document Lacks Substantive Content The document contains only a header and no substantive information linking any influential actors, financial flows, or misconduct. It provides no actionable leads for investigation. Key insights: Document appears to be a placeholder or file identifier only; No names, dates, transactions, or allegations present
Attorney Bradley Edwards alleges Jeffrey Epstein's non‑prosecution agreement, 5th Amendment tactics, and a unique George Rush tape as key evidence ...
The affidavit details a non‑prosecution agreement that shielded Epstein from federal charges, claims that Epstein repeatedly invoked the Fifth Amendment to block discovery, and describes a purportedly Epstein secured a federal non‑prosecution agreement that barred criminal charges for ~30 victims in All co‑defendants and Epstein invoked the Fifth Amendment, leaving plaintiffs with no substantive
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.