Skip to content
Case File
d-6529Court UnsealedLegal Filing

Court Filing: 183

Date
Unknown
Source
Court Unsealed
Reference
File: 183
Pages
7
Persons
6

Summary

Boies Schiller Flexner LLP objects to a Rule 17(c) subpoena sought by Ghislaine Maxwell, arguing that it is a 'fishing expedition' aimed at obtaining impeachment material and that the documents sought are not relevant or admissible. The law firm represents alleged victims of Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, including Virginia Giuffre and Annie Farmer.

This document is from the epstein-docs Archive.

View Source Collection
Share
PostReddit

Related Documents (6)

Court UnsealedCorrespondenceUnknown

Court Filing - Letter to Judge: 191

Boies Schiller Flexner LLP (BSF) responds to a court order regarding a Rule 17(c) subpoena issued by Ghislaine Maxwell, objecting to the subpoena and arguing it is an improper attempt to obtain impeachment material. BSF represents several Epstein victims and argues the subpoena is overly broad and not relevant to the case.

7p
Court UnsealedLegal FilingUnknown

Court Filing: 100-1

Annie Farmer, a victim of Ghislaine Maxwell's alleged child sexual abuse, submits a statement opposing Maxwell's bail request, citing concerns that she will flee or harm others if released. Farmer describes Maxwell's alleged abuse and manipulation, characterizing her as a psychopath with no remorse. The statement urges the court to keep Maxwell incarcerated until trial to ensure justice and prevent further harm.

2p
Court UnsealedLegal FilingUnknown

Court Filing: 72

The document is a court filing by Annie Farmer's counsel, Sigrid McCawley, in response to the Department of Justice's notice regarding the proposed disclosure of Jeffrey Epstein's and Ghislaine Maxwell's grand jury transcripts. The filing supports the unsealing of the transcripts with redactions to protect victims' identities, citing the need for transparency and accountability in the case.

5p
Court UnsealedLegal FilingUnknown

Court Filing - Opinion & Order: 307

The document is an Opinion & Order by Judge Alison J. Nathan denying Ghislaine Maxwell's motion to suppress evidence obtained through a grand jury subpoena to her former civil litigation law firm. The court ruled that the evidence should not be suppressed despite Maxwell's claims that it was obtained in violation of her rights. The decision is based on the court's analysis of the protective order in the civil case and its modification by another judge.

21p
Court UnsealedLegal FilingUnknown

Court Filing - Affirmation in Opposition to Appeal: 58-1

The document is an affirmation by Assistant United States Attorney Lara Pomerantz in opposition to Ghislaine Maxwell's appeal against the denial of pre-trial release. It outlines the charges against Maxwell, including conspiracy to entice minors to travel for illegal sex acts and sex trafficking, and details the evidence supporting these charges. The affirmation argues that Maxwell's detention is justified due to the risk of flight and the strength of the government's case.

25p
Court UnsealedLegal FilingUnknown

Court Filing: 682

The court allows seven individuals to submit written statements as part of the sentencing record in the Ghislaine Maxwell case, despite the defendant's objections. The court denies the defendant's request for redactions, citing the presumption of public access to court documents. The written statements will be made public without redactions.

4p

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.