Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00072442DOJ Data Set 9Other

" cat'

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00072442
Pages
1
Persons
5
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

From: " cat' To: Brad Edwards <=lia>, Brittany Henderson <MIIla> Cc: MEW)" aNIMIW, (USANYS)" Subject: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell Date: Thu, 08 Apr 2021 17:18:35 +0000 Hi Brad and Brittany, We wanted to let you know that there are two upcoming court appearances in this case: • Judge Nathan has scheduled an in-person arraignment for April 23rd, at 2:30 p.m., in courtroom 24B at 500 Pearl Street. The Court has issued an order noting that further information about public access, including a public dial-in number, will be posted to the docket sheet. • The Second Circuit has scheduled a remote oral argument in connection with the defendant's bail appeal for April 26th at 10 a.m. Second Circuit arguments are livestreamed at the following link: https://ww2.ca2.uscourts.gov/court.html Best, Assistant United States Attorney Southern District of New York One Saint Andrew's Plaza New York, NY 10007 EFTA00072442

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009
Ask AI about this document

Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: " cat' To: Brad Edwards <=lia>, Brittany Henderson <MIIla> Cc: MEW)" aNIMIW, (USANYS)" Subject: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell Date: Thu, 08 Apr 2021 17:18:35 +0000 Hi Brad and Brittany, We wanted to let you know that there are two upcoming court appearances in this case: • Judge Nathan has scheduled an in-person arraignment for April 23rd, at 2:30 p.m., in courtroom 24B at 500 Pearl Street. The Court has issued an order noting that further information about public access, including a public dial-in number, will be posted to the docket sheet. • The Second Circuit has scheduled a remote oral argument in connection with the defendant's bail appeal for April 26th at 10 a.m. Second Circuit arguments are livestreamed at the following link: https://ww2.ca2.uscourts.gov/court.html Best, Assistant United States Attorney Southern District of New York One Saint Andrew's Plaza New York, NY 10007 EFTA00072442

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 20-2413. Document 40. 08'20/2020. 2913550, Pagel of 74

Case 20-2413. Document 40. 08'20/2020. 2913550, Pagel of 74 20-2413 United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit Plaintlff-Appelke, —against— GHISLA1NE MAXWELL, Defendant-Appellant, SHARON CHURCHER, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Respondents, JULIE BROWN, MIAMI HERALD MEDIA COMPANY, ALAN M. DERSHOWITZ, MICHAEL CERNOVICH, DBA CERNOVICH MEDIA Intervenors. ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, 15-CV-7433 (LAP) Ghislaine Maxwell's Opening Brief Ty Gee Adam Mueller HADDON, MORGAN AND FOREMAN, P.C. 150 East 10th Avenue Den r 2 Tel. Attorneys for Defendant-Appellant Ghislaine Maxwell EFTA00075477 Case 20-2413, Document 40, 08/20/2020, 2913550, Page2 of 74 Table of Contents Table of Authorities iii Introduction 1 Jurisdictional Statement 2 Issues Presented 3 Statement of the Case and the Facts 3 The defamation action and the Protective Order 3 The motion to unseal and the first appeal 6 The remand, the arrest,

74p
House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

Extensive court filing outlines alleged Jeffrey Epstein abuse network, non‑prosecution deal, and potential ties to high‑profile figures (Clinton, T...

The document provides a dense compilation of alleged facts, emails, deposition excerpts, and discovery requests that link Jeffrey Epstein’s sexual‑abuse operation to a “pyramid” recruitment scheme, a Epstein allegedly ran a “pyramid” scheme paying underage victims $200‑$300 per recruited girl. A 2007 non‑prosecution agreement (NPA) with the U.S. Attorney’s Office allegedly shielded Epstein fr Ema

39p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2, Plaintiffs I UNITED STATES, Defendants JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2'S FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION TO THE GOVERNMENT REGARDING INFORMATION RELEVANT TO THEIR PENDING ACTION CONCERN THE CRIME VICTIMS RIGHTS ACT COME NOW Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 ("the victims"), by and through undersigned counsel, and request the defendant United States (hereinafter "the Government") to produce the original or best copy of the items listed herein below for inspection and/or copying, pursuant to the Court's Order (DE #99) directing discovery in this case. BACKGROUND As the Government will recall, the victims have asked the Government to stipulate to undisputed facts in this case. The Government has declined. Accordingly, the victims filed their Motion for Finding of Violations of the Crime Victims' Rights Act and Request for a Hearing on Appropriate Remedies (DE 48

13p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing,

Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos £t Lehrman, P.L. 'Ovid Pam ftoisl pet WWW.PATITTOJUSTKE.COM 425 North Andrews Avenue • Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 4 00 "ti e 6.‘ tk i r atire CalkAllfle alvdtr aIINNEV rar ,NYTTENNINIP PITNEY 'OWES 02 !F $003 , 50 0 000i3V, wit JAN 2i 2,2!3 .a4P En M ZIP t20-12E 3330 Dexter Lee A. Marie Villafatia 500 S. Australian Ave., Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 EFTA00191396 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, 1. UNITED STATES, Respondent. SEALED DOCUMENT EFTA00191397 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, UNITED STATES, Respondent. SEALED DOCUMENT MOTION TO SEAL Petitioners Jane Doc No. 1 and Jane Doe No. 2, joined by movants Jane Doe No. 3 and Jane Doe No. 4, move to file the attached pleading and supporti

71p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Attorney Bradley Edwards alleges Jeffrey Epstein's non‑prosecution agreement, 5th Amendment tactics, and a unique George Rush tape as key evidence ...

The affidavit details a non‑prosecution agreement that shielded Epstein from federal charges, claims that Epstein repeatedly invoked the Fifth Amendment to block discovery, and describes a purportedly Epstein secured a federal non‑prosecution agreement that barred criminal charges for ~30 victims in All co‑defendants and Epstein invoked the Fifth Amendment, leaving plaintiffs with no substantive

23p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

MEDIA 12) 2009

MEDIA 12) 2009 EFTA00259984 Mr. Epstein proves Palm Beach not immune to pedophiles Page 1 of I PalmBeachDailyNpy csgm Mr. Epstein proves Palm Beach not immune to pedophiles Saturday, November 28, 2009 cia PRINTTHIS Powered by tiClickability As a concerned mother in a three-generational Palm Beach family, I have come to realize that our little Valhalla is no exception to the mounting social problems facing our nation. In fact, our barrier-reef island has become home to one of the most notorious pedophiles in the history of child trafficking. Jeffrey E. Epstein, the infamous registered sex offender who lives on one of the town's highly regarded "three El streets," physically abused, raped, solicited prostitution of minor children and trafficked in girls from Palm Beach County. His sentencing widely differed from the seriousness of the indictment. Out of an 18-month sentence, he served only 13 months' incarceration at the West Palm Beach stockade. His privileges included

34p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.