Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00072443DOJ Data Set 9Other

From: "a

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00072443
Pages
1
Persons
5
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

From: "a > To: Sigrid McCawley <[email protected]> Cc: Subject: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell Date: Thu, 08 Apr 2021 17:17:14 +0000 Hi Sigrid, We wanted to let you know that there are two upcoming court appearances in this case: • Judge Nathan has scheduled an in-person arraignment for April 23rd, at 2:30 p.m., in courtroom 24B at 500 Pearl Street. The Court has issued an order noting that further information about public access, including a public dial-in number, will be posted to the docket sheet. • The Second Circuit has scheduled a remote oral argument in connection with the defendant's bail appeal for April 26th at 10 a.m. Second Circuit arguments are livestreamed at the following link: https://ww2.ca2.uscourts.gov/court.html Best, Assistant United States Attorney Southern District of New York EFTA00072443

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009
Ask AI about this document

Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: "a > To: Sigrid McCawley <[email protected]> Cc: Subject: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell Date: Thu, 08 Apr 2021 17:17:14 +0000 Hi Sigrid, We wanted to let you know that there are two upcoming court appearances in this case: • Judge Nathan has scheduled an in-person arraignment for April 23rd, at 2:30 p.m., in courtroom 24B at 500 Pearl Street. The Court has issued an order noting that further information about public access, including a public dial-in number, will be posted to the docket sheet. • The Second Circuit has scheduled a remote oral argument in connection with the defendant's bail appeal for April 26th at 10 a.m. Second Circuit arguments are livestreamed at the following link: https://ww2.ca2.uscourts.gov/court.html Best, Assistant United States Attorney Southern District of New York EFTA00072443

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

From: "Strauss, Audrey (USANYS)"

From: "Strauss, Audrey (USANYS)" To: ' (USANYS)" Subject: RE: NYLJ Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2019 16:36:28 +0000 Yes, saw that. thanks From: (USANYS) < Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2019 11:19 AM To: Berman, Geoffrey (USANYS) Cc: (USANYS) Subject: FW: NYU ; Strauss, Audrey (USANYS) The Epstein estate's filing seeking permission to hire Ken Feinberg has started to draw press attention. From (USANYS) Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2019 11:08 AM To: ilUSANYS) < (USANYS) Cc: (USANYS) [Contractor] Subject: RE: NYU Also, NYT reporting on a possible victims fund: Jeffrey Epstein's Estate May Set Up a Program to Pay Accusers A proposal for a "claims resolution program" was referred to in a court filing by a lawyer for a woman who accused the financier of sexual abuse. Not all the plaintiffs' lawyers are on board. By Matthew Goldstein Nov. 13, 2019 Lawyers for Jeffrey Epstein's estate are considering setting up a program to resolve claims filed by women who say they were a

6p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Ces2e.29-12,407413r3cliAlienDtidutinEl t310282 if663615/233/2174ig Plage aoat 9

Ces2e.29-12,407413r3cliAlienDtidutinEl t310282 if663615/233/2174ig Plage aoat 9 HADDON MORGAN FOREMAN July 29, 2020 Honorable Loretta A. Preska United States District Court Southern District of New York 500 Pearl Street New York, NY 10007 Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P C Ty Gee 150 East 10th Avenue Denver, Colorado 80203 PH 303.831.7364 HI 303.832.2628 www.hmllaw.com [email protected] Re: Reconsideration of the Court's July 23 Ruling Giuffie v. Ghislaine Maxwell, No. 15 Civ. 7433 (LAP) Dear Judge Preska: As counsel for Ms. Maxwell we write to request that the Court vindicate its Protective Order and punish its violation. Ms. Maxwell's two deposition transcripts were designated "Confidential" and subject to the protection of the Protective Order. Both transcripts ended up in the hands of the government, which used them to bring an indictment against Ms. Maxwell, charging her with, among other things, perjury in her deposition testimony. This is a serious violation

209p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 20-2413. Document 40. 08'20/2020. 2913550, Pagel of 74

Case 20-2413. Document 40. 08'20/2020. 2913550, Pagel of 74 20-2413 United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit Plaintlff-Appelke, —against— GHISLA1NE MAXWELL, Defendant-Appellant, SHARON CHURCHER, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Respondents, JULIE BROWN, MIAMI HERALD MEDIA COMPANY, ALAN M. DERSHOWITZ, MICHAEL CERNOVICH, DBA CERNOVICH MEDIA Intervenors. ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, 15-CV-7433 (LAP) Ghislaine Maxwell's Opening Brief Ty Gee Adam Mueller HADDON, MORGAN AND FOREMAN, P.C. 150 East 10th Avenue Den r 2 Tel. Attorneys for Defendant-Appellant Ghislaine Maxwell EFTA00075477 Case 20-2413, Document 40, 08/20/2020, 2913550, Page2 of 74 Table of Contents Table of Authorities iii Introduction 1 Jurisdictional Statement 2 Issues Presented 3 Statement of the Case and the Facts 3 The defamation action and the Protective Order 3 The motion to unseal and the first appeal 6 The remand, the arrest,

74p
House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

Virginia Roberts v. Alan Dershowitz – Allegations of Sex Trafficking, NPA Manipulation, and Defamation

The complaint provides a dense web of alleged connections between Alan Dershowitz, Jeffrey Epstein, former U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta, and the 2008 non‑prosecution agreement (NPA). It cites specif Roberts alleges she was trafficked by Epstein from 2000‑2002 and forced to have sex with Dershowitz. Dershowitz is accused of helping draft and pressure the government into the 2008 NPA that shielded

87p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. x 20 Cr. 330 (MN) REPLY MEMORANDUM OF GHISLAINE MAXWELL IN SUPPORT OF HER MOTION UNDER THE DUE PROCESS CLAUSE TO SUPPRESS ALL EVIDENCE OBTAINED FROM THE GOVERNMENT'S SUBPOENA TO BOLES SCHILLER AND TO DISMISS COUNTS FIVE AND SIX Jeffrey S. Pagliuca Laura A. Menninger HADDON, MORGAN & FOREMAN P.C. 150 East 10th Avenue Denver, CO 80203 Christian R. Everdell COHEN & GRESSER LLP 800 Third Avenue New York, NY 10022 Bobbi C. Stemheim Law Offices of Bobbi C. Stemheim 33 West 19th Street - 4th Floor New York, NY 10011 Attorneys for Ghislaine Maxwell EFTA00077571 Table of Contents Table of Contents Table of Authorities ii Table of Exhibits iv Introduction and Summary of the Argument 1 I. The Facts 2 II. The Government's Response to Maxwell's Motion. 6 A. The Government's Defenses Are Not Credible. 7 B. Assuming the Government's De

34p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

(USANYS)"

From: (USANYS)" To: aUSANYS)" Cc: " (USANYS) [Contractor]" < Subject: RE: NYLJ Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2019 16:08:12 +0000 (USANYS)" Also, NYT reporting on a possible victims fund: Jeffrey Epstein's Estate May Set Up a Program to Pay Accusers A proposal for a "claims resolution program" was referred to in a court filing by a lawyer for a woman who accused the financier of sexual abuse. Not all the plaintiffs' lawyers are on board. By Matthew Goldstein Nov. 13, 2019 Lawyers for Jeffrey Epstein's estate are considering setting up a program to resolve claims filed by women who say they were abused by the financier, who killed himself in August while facing federal sex trafficking charges. The plan was disclosed in a court filing on Tuesday by a lawyer for one of Mr. Epstein's accusers, who is suing the estate in federal court in Manhattan. The filing said lawyers for Mr. Epstein's estate had informed plaintiffs that they were planning to disclose details of a "claims resol

6p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.