Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00209732DOJ Data Set 9Other

(USAFLS)"

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00209732
Pages
5
Persons
5
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

From: To:' (USAFLS)" (USAFLS)" Subject: RE: Correcting False Representation in Epstein's Response to our Motion to Dismiss Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2013 12:42:19 +0000 Importance: Normal Inline-Images: image00 1 .jpg I'm sure that's fine; can I look at it more closely after oral argument and get back to you mid-morning? Thanks, From: (USAFLS) Sent: Thursd July 18, 2013 8:36 AM To: (USAFLS); (USAFLS); (USAFLS) Subject: FW: Correcting False Representation In Epstein's Response to our Motion to Dismiss Dear — As per usual, Prof. Cassell is overly pushy. Would you mind if I respond — or responds — as follows: Dear Paul: All matters dealing with the Eleventh Circuit are handled by the Appellate Division. Your inquiry has been forwarded and we will respond when we have an answer. In the meantime, we are busy addressing the District Court's Friday deadline. Assistant U.S. Attorney Southern District of Florida ENE From: Paul Cassell Sent: Thursda July 18, 2013 2:03 A

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009
Ask AI about this document

Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: To: ' (USAFLS)" (USAFLS)" Subject: RE: Correcting False Representation in Epstein's Response to our Motion to Dismiss Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2013 12:42:19 +0000 Importance: Normal Inline-Images: image00 1 .jpg I'm sure that's fine; can I look at it more closely after oral argument and get back to you mid-morning? Thanks, From: (USAFLS) Sent: Thursd July 18, 2013 8:36 AM To: (USAFLS); (USAFLS); (USAFLS) Subject: FW: Correcting False Representation In Epstein's Response to our Motion to Dismiss Dear — As per usual, Prof. Cassell is overly pushy. Would you mind if I respond — or responds — as follows: Dear Paul: All matters dealing with the Eleventh Circuit are handled by the Appellate Division. Your inquiry has been forwarded and we will respond when we have an answer. In the meantime, we are busy addressing the District Court's Friday deadline. Assistant U.S. Attorney Southern District of Florida ENE From: Paul Cassell Sent: Thursda July 18, 2013 2:03 AM To: USAFLS); Brad Edwards; (USAFLS) Cc: (USAFLS); Maria Kelljchian Subject: RE: Correcting False Representation in Epstein's Response to our Motion to Dismiss Hi =I What is the Government doing to correct the false impression? We contacted you on Monday about this and, as you know, we are hoping for a ruling from the Eleventh Circuit quickly. If you do not have time to correct this false impression, please just send us a one-sentence email and Brad and I will provide it to the Eleventh Circuit. Thanks for your prompt attention to this. We do not believe it is fair for Epstein to falsely represent the Government's position and then have the Government, through silence, allow that false representation to be the potential basis of Eleventh Circuit action. EFTA00209732 Paul Cassell and Brad Edwards for Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 Paul G. Cassell Ronald N. Boyce Presidential Professor of Criminal Law Si. . Quinney College of Law at the University of Utah You can access my publications on http://ssm.com/author=30160 CONFIDENTIAL: This electronic message - along with any/all attachments is confidential. This message is intended only for the use of the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not use, disseminate, distribute or copy this communication. If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply electronic mail and delete the original message. Professor Cassell is admitted to the Utah State Bar, but not the bars of other states. Thank you. From: Paul Cassell Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2013 1:26 AM To: .LS); Brad Edwards; (USAFLS) Cc: (USAFLS); Maria Kelljchian Subject: RE: Representation in Epstein's Response to our Motion to Dismiss Hi Here is Epstein's response to the motion to dismiss. With the Government not filing anything on the motion to dismiss, it is allowing Epstein to represent to the CAll that the Government agrees with his position -- the Government needs to correct that false impression. Thanks for your quick attention to this. Paul Cassell and Brad Edwards for Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 Paul G. Cassell Ronald N. Boyce Presidential Professor of Criminal Law Si. . Quinney College of Law at the University of Utah You can access my publications on http://ssm.com/author=30160 CONFIDENTIAL: This electronic message - along with any/all attachments is confidential. This message is intended only for the use of the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not use, disseminate, distribute or copy this communication. If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply electronic mail and delete the original message. Professor Cassell is admitted to the Utah State Bar, but not the bars of other states. Thank you. From: (USAFLS) [1 Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2013 6:46 AM To: Paul Cassell• Brad Edwards; . (USAFLS) Cc: (USAFLS); Maria Kelljchian Subject: RE: Representation in Epstein's Response to our Motion to Dismiss Paul, I have not seen Mr. Epstein's response to your motion to dismiss in the Eleventh Circuit. When was it filed? Could you provide me with a copy? Thank you. From: Paul Cassell [ Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2013 2:12 AM EFTA00209733 To: ailaLS); Brad Edwards; (USAFLS) Cc: (USAFLS); Maria Kelljchian Subject: RE: Representation in Epstein's Response to our Motion to Dismiss Dear You will have seen Epstein's response to our motion to dismiss, in which he states: "Intervenors have also contended that the correspondence was privileged and confidential, a position with which the government agrees." (p. 18) I have not seen anything in the record to support that statement. To the contrary, the only thing I have seen from the Government is its statement in doc. #98: "Movant Epstein bears the burden of establishing that the communications he seeks to withhold from disclosure fall within the attorney-client or other privilege." (Doc. #98 at 4). Can you confirm that Epstein's statement that the Government agrees on privilege and confidentiality is false? And, if so, is the Government planning to do anything to correct the incorrect representation that Epstein has made to the Eleventh Circuit? Thanks in advance for your rapid response on this issue. It would be very unfortunate if the Eleventh Circuit were to take action in this case based on false information about the Government's position. Paul Cassell and Brad Edwards for Jane Doe No. 1 and Jane Doe No. 2 Paul G. Cassell Ronald N. Boyce Presidential Professor of Criminal Law S.J. Quinney College of Law at the University of Utah You can access my publications on http://ssm.com/author=30160 CONFIDENTIAL: This electronic message along with any/all attachments is confidential. This message is intended only for the use of the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not use, disseminate, distribute or copy this communication. If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply electronic mail and delete the original message. Professor Cassell is admitted to the Utah State Bar, but not the bars of other states. Thank you. From: (USAFLS) [ Sent: Thursday, Jul 11 2013 11:46 AM To: Brad Edwards; (USAFLS) Cc: (USAFLS); Maria Kelljchian; Paul Cassell Subject: RE: Epstein's Motion for Limited Intervention Brad, Can you call me at at 5:00 p.m.? Thanks. From: Brad Edwards [mailto: Sent: Thursda July 11, 2013 1:22 PM To: USAFLS); (USAFLS) Cc: (USAFLS); Maria Kelljchian; Paul Cassell ([email protected]) Subject: RE: Epstein's Motion for Limited Intervention That's fine. Do you have a conference call number you want us to call in on, or just a number you want me to call at 5:00? Send me that info, and we'll talk at 5:00. Thanks Brad Edwards EFTA00209734 Civil Justice Attorney Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos £t Lehrman, P.L. Toll-free: f www.pathtojustice.com Become our fan on Facebook Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail. IRS Circular 230 Disclosure: Please note that the views expressed herein or in any attachments hereto are not intended to constitute a 'reliance opinion' under applicable Treasury Regulations, and accordingly are not intended or written to be used, and may not be used or relied upon, for the purpose of (i) avoiding tax-related penalties that may be imposed by the Internal Revenue Service, or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any tax-related matters addressed herein. NOTICE: THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS TRANSMISSION IS ATTORNEY PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL. IT IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE USE OF THE INDIVIDUAL OR ENTITY NAMED ABOVE. IF THE READER OF THIS MESSAGE IS NOT THE INTENDED RECIPIENT, YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT ANY DISSEMINATION, DISTRIBUTION OR COPY OF THIS COMMUNICATION IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. IF YOU HAVE RECEIVED THIS COMMUNICATION IN ERROR. PLEASE NOTIFY US IMMEDIATELY BY TELEPHONE TOLL FREE (800)400-1098 AND DELETE THE MATERIAL FROM ANY COMPUTER. THANK YOU. From: (USAFLS) fmallto: Sent Thursday, Jul 11 2013 1:11 PM To: Brad Edwards; (USAFLS) Cc: (USAFLS); Maria Kelljchian; Paul Cassell (cassellialaw.utah.edu) Subject: RE: Epstein's Motion for Limited Intervention Brad, I have not been able to speak with my colleagues on a good time. Can we try for 5:00 p.m. Eastern time? Thanks. From: Brad Edwards [mailto: Sent: Thursda Jul 11 2013 11:43 AM To: . (USAFLS); (USAFLS) Cc: (USAFLS); Maria Kelljchian; Paul Cassell (cassellpalaw.utah.edu) Subject: Epstein's Motion for Limited Intervention Marie, What time today can you discuss Epstein's recently filed motion for limited intervention? We can make ourselves availably any time other than between 3-4. Please let us know what number to call you on and we will call at precisely that time so as not to inconvenience you any longer than necessary. Thank you. Sincerely, Brad Edwards Civil Justice Attorney Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, EFTA00209735 Edwards, Fistos Et Lehrman, P.L. Telephone: Facsimile: Toll-free: f www.pathtojustice.com Become our fan on Facebook Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail. IRS Circular 230 Disclosure: Please note that the views expressed herein or in any attachments hereto are not intended to constitute a "reliance opinion* under applicable Treasury Regulations, and accordingly are not intended or written to be used, and may not be used or relied upon, for the purpose of (i) avoiding tax-related penalties that may be imposed by the Internal Revenue Service, or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any tax-related matters addressed herein. NOTICE: THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS TRANSMISSION IS ATTORNEY PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL. IT IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE USE OF THE INDIVIDUAL OR ENTITY NAMED ABOVE. IF THE READER OF THIS MESSAGE IS NOT THE INTENDED RECIPIENT, YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT ANY DISSEMINATION, DISTRIBUTION OR COPY OF THIS COMMUNICATION IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. IF YOU HAVE RECEIVED THIS COMMUNICATION IN ERROR. PLEASE NOTIFY US IMMEDIATELY BY TELEPHONE TOLL FREE (800)400-1098 AND DELETE THE MATERIAL FROM ANY COMPUTER. THANK YOU. EFTA00209736

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Subject: Re: Motion to Compel and S.J. Briefing Schedule

From: To: Cc: Subject: Re: Motion to Compel and S.J. Briefing Schedule Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2017 20:25:09 +0000 Importance: Normal 6:00pm is fine for me. Sent from my iPhone On Mar 8, 2017, at 15:22, Either is fine. I will be here late. From: Sent: Wednesday, March 08, 2017 3:16 PM To: Subje : : o ion o ompe an S.J. rie ingc e ue wrote: I have a conference call at 5pm. It should be over by 6pm, if not earlier. Can we talk at 6pm or I can email you if my conference call ends earlier? From: Sent: Wednesday, March 08, 2017 2:38 PM To: Subject: RE: Motion to Compel and S.i. Briefing Schedule You can get me on the line once alls in. I will be at my desk -= From Sent: Wednesday, March 08, 2017 2:11 PM To: Cc: Subject: Re: Motion to Compel and S.J. Briefing Schedule I am out of class at 5:15 pm. What number shall I call? EFTA00211070 Sent from my iPhone On Mar 8, 2017, at 11:56, Can we talk later this afternoon? Begin forwarded message: From: Paul Cassell < Da

3p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Subject: FW: OPR inquiry - request for information

From To Subject: FW: OPR inquiry - request for information Date: Tue, 03 May 2011 16:31:22 +0000 Importance: Normal Attachments: motion-intervene.pdf; sanctions-motion-attached.pdf This is Cassell's response to Bruce Reinhart's motion to intervene. From: Paul rakeoll [- Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2011 12:23 PM To: Cc: Brad Edwards Subject: RE: OPR inquiry - request for information Dear As you will have seen, Bruce Reinhard has filed a motion to intervene in our Crime Victims' Rights Act case. (Since has not been served, I attach a copy of the pleading to this e-mail). As you will see, Reinhard claims that we have no factual basis for making an assertion that (for example) Reinhard improperly represented in violation of Justice Department regulations. In view of this motion, we are writing to inquire into the current status of the Justice Department's inquiry into Reinhard's conduct. We also believe that the Justice Department has access to information that will support

4p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

From: '

From: ' (USAFLS)" To: >, ' (USAFLS)" Subject: RE: Motion to Compel and S.J. Briefing Schedule Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2017 19:38:15 +0000 Importance: Normal Hi I.— You can get me on the line once calls in. I will be at my desk — 41047 A. Vi&faller Assistant U.S. Attorney Southern District of Florida From: M, (USAFLS) Sent: Wednesday, March 08, 2017 2:11 PM To:a (USAFLS) < Cc:a MI I. (USAFLS) Subject: Re: Motion to Compel and Si. Briefing Schedule I am out of class at 5:15 pm. What number shall I call? Sent from my iPhone c On Mar 8, 2017, at 11:56, a, (USAFLS) > wrote: Can we talk later this afternoon? Begin forwarded message: From: Paul Cassell <a> Date: March 8, 2017 at 8:51:03 AM EST To: "Brad Edwards (USAFLS)" Cc: " I. (USAFLS)" '`= > (USAFLS)" Subject: RE: Motion to Compel and S.J. Briefing Schedule Dear I'm writing to express some concerns about the Government's recent response to our most recent discovery requests and to request a stipulated bri

3p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-CI V-Marra/Matthewman JANE DOE # I and JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, I UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. UNITED STATES' RESPONSE TO PETITIONERS' FIRST REOUEST FOR ADMISSIONS TO THE GOVERNMENT The United States (hereinafter the "government") hereby responds to Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2's First Request for Admissions to the Government Regarding Questions Relevant to Their Pending Action Concerning the Crime Victims Rights Act (hereinafter the "Request for Admissions"), and states as follows:' I. The government admits that the FBI and the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida ("USAO") conducted an investigation into Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein") and developed evidence and information in contemplation of a potential federal prosecution against Epstein for many federal sex offenses. Except as otherwise admitted above, the government denies Request No. I. The government's res

65p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Subjec

Fr • < > Subjec :Deliberative t Process ec aratton rom am Justice - equest or wo ee xtension Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2013 17:59:47 +0000 Importance: Normal We have no objection, provided we get the following accommodation, which you already anticipated. We would request that your motion for extension of time give us an extension on our reply document, such that our reply would be due 10 days after the main Justice Department declaration that will be coming in two weeks. If you would include such language as well in any proposed order, saving us (and the court) drafting time, that would be very much appreciated. Paul Cassell and Brad Edwards for Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 Paul G Cassell CONFIDENTIAL: This electronic message along with any/all attachments is confidential. This message is intended only for the use of the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not use, disseminate, distribute or copy this communication. If you have received this message

2p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

From: Paul Cassell

From: Paul Cassell To: Cc: Brad Edwards Subject: ere o "e tan on t e ropose tatement of Facts? Date: Mon, 08 Nov 2010 21:24:26 +0000 Importance: Normal Hi Brad and I both agree that we need to get the facts resolved first, then discuss where we go from there. At the same time, we want to get this moving along. Can we set a specific time line for getting the facts resolved — is there a time that works for you and in the near future to have a conference call? Then is there a specific time shortly after Thanksgiving that would workyou're your U.S. Attorney? Paul Paul G. Cassell Ronald N. Boyce Presidential Professor of Criminal Law http://www.law.utah.edu/profiles/default.asp?PersonID=S7&name=Cassell Paul CONFIDENTIAL: This electronic message - along with any/all attachments - is confidential. This message is intended only for the use of the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, the person responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you may not use

4p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.