Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00210981DOJ Data Set 9Other

(USAFLS)" c

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00210981
Pages
5
Persons
8
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

From: (USAFLS)" c To: SAFLS (USAFLS (USAFLS)" (USAFLS)" Subject: Fw: Urgent request -- Jane Doe #3's 302's Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2015 00:26:15 +0000 Importance: Normal Inline-Images: image001.png; image002.png; image003.jpg; image004.png I received this urgent request from Cassell seeking copies of the FBI 302's pertaining to interviews of I will contact the FBI FOIA unit tomorrow morning to see if Cassell did file a FOIA request for the 302's. If the FBI has no basis under the FOIA to withhold the documents, then I believe they should be released to Cassell. The reason we did not provide the 302's to Cassell, like we did for Jane Does 1 and 2, was because U is not a party to the CVRA lawsuit. From: Paul Cassell [mailto: Sent: Sunda January 04, 2015 05:20 PM To: (USAFLS); Subject: RE: Urgent request -- Jane Doe #3's 302's Dear ME. Brad and I writing with an urgent request: We would like for you to send us ' (a/k/a Jane Doe #3's) FBI 302's as soon as possible. If ne

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009
Ask AI about this document

Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: (USAFLS)" c To: SAFLS (USAFLS (USAFLS)" (USAFLS)" Subject: Fw: Urgent request -- Jane Doe #3's 302's Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2015 00:26:15 +0000 Importance: Normal Inline-Images: image001.png; image002.png; image003.jpg; image004.png I received this urgent request from Cassell seeking copies of the FBI 302's pertaining to interviews of I will contact the FBI FOIA unit tomorrow morning to see if Cassell did file a FOIA request for the 302's. If the FBI has no basis under the FOIA to withhold the documents, then I believe they should be released to Cassell. The reason we did not provide the 302's to Cassell, like we did for Jane Does 1 and 2, was because U is not a party to the CVRA lawsuit. From: Paul Cassell [mailto: Sent: Sunda January 04, 2015 05:20 PM To: (USAFLS); Subject: RE: Urgent request -- Jane Doe #3's 302's Dear ME. Brad and I writing with an urgent request: We would like for you to send us ' (a/k/a Jane Doe #3's) FBI 302's as soon as possible. If necessary, we would like for you to run this request up the chain rapidly as appropriate to get permission. Our reason for writing to try and avoid another possible point of contention between the Government and a victim in the Epstein case. A bit of background: As you recall, we represent Jane Doe #3. We requested of the FBI, and then of you, her 302's early in 2014. We were instructed to file a FOIA request. We did that in July. There was a bit of back on forth on this back in August, but we haven't heard anything since. More recently, as you know, Jane Doe #3 filed a request to join the CVRA case. She made certain factual allegations in that pleading, including the fact that she had been trafficked by Jeffrey Epstein to Prince Andrew and former Harvard Law Professor Alan Dershowitz. These allegations have been picked up by media worldwide. As a result of these allegations, Ms. has been attacked. For example, Buckingham Palace has identified her and called her a liar. Mr. Dershowitz has said: "I'm also challenging the young woman and the lawyers to level those charges against me outside of the courtroom, so that I can sue them for defamation. ... Finally, I'm challenging the woman to file criminal charges against me because the filing of false criminal charges is a crime." http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/01/03/alan-dershowitz-sexual-assault_n_6410380.html Mr. Dershowitz has also indicated that he will begin disbarment proceedings against Brad and me tomorrow, Monday. EFTA00210981 We are considering what response Ms. should make to these charges. Of course, it would be very useful to responding to Mr. Dershowitz to show that she has reported the crimes against her to the FBI, well before any of the recent events. But as of right now, she does not have her 302's. We are considering whether Ms. should make a statement next week. If she does, as things stand, she might be forced to say something along the lines of "My attorneys requested the documents showing that I reported crimes to the FBI, but the Government has refused to provide those documents to me." Frankly, this seems like an unnecessary sideshow to the other issues that are swirling around. And we strongly believe that Ms. is entitled to see her 302's, both under FOIA and under the Crime Victims' Rights Act. We would note that the Government voluntarily provided the 302's to us for Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2, so we can't understand why they are still being withheld from Jane Doe #3. In light of all this, we are writing to urgent request that you eliminate this unnecessary dispute and simply send us Jane Doe #3's FBI 302's (particularly the interview in Australia). We hope you will agree this is a reasonable request and one way to avoid getting into a fight over this - a fight that we believe the Government will ultimately lose in any event. We would like to have this issue presented to the appropriate decision maker (Mr. M) as rapidly as possible, so that we could receive the 302's by c.o.b. Monday. Thank you in advance for considering this request - a request made in good faith to smoothly resolve an issue. Paul Cassell and Brad Edwards, co-counsel for Jane Doe #3 Paul G. Cassell Ronald N. Boyce Presidential Professor of Criminal Law Quinney College of Law at the University of Utah You can access my publications on http://ssrn.com/author=30160 CONFIDENTIAL: This electronic message - along with any/all attachments - is confidential. This message is intended only for the use of the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not use, disseminate, distribute or copy this communication. If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply electronic mail and delete the original message. Professor Cassell is admitted to the Utah State Bar, but not the bars of other states. Thank you. From: (USAFLS) [mallto: Sent: Friday, January 02, 2015 9:49 AM To: Paul Cassell; Subject: Re: Meeting in January 2015 Paul and Brad, We will do all we can to accommodate your schedule, to avoid you having to cancel your class. Happy New Year. From: Paul Cassell [mailto Sent: Friday, January 02, 2015 11:42 AM To: Brad Edwards < Subject: RE: Meeting in January 2015 Hi >; (USAFLS) As Brad mentioned, it's a bit tricky for me to get out there and back. The best days for me are Wednesday Jan. 20 or Jan. 27 (any time, morning preferred). The second best days for me are Jan. 21 or Jan. 28, in the morning, so that I can fly EFTA00210982 home for class Friday morning. Brad can chime in with any conflicts that he has. I have weird teaching schedule this semester, teaching Monday afternoon, Tuesday morning and Friday morning. I'm hoping to avoid having to cancel a class, but could do that if absolutely necessary. Thanks! Paul Paul G. Cassell Ronald N. Boyce Presidential Professor of Criminal Law S.J. Quinsy College of Law at the University of Utah You can access my publications on http://ssm.com/author=30160 CONFIDENTIAL: This electronic message along with any/all attachments is confidential. This message is intended only for the use of the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not use, disseminate, distribute or copy this communication. If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply electronic mail and delete the original message. Professor Cassell is admitted to the Utah State Bar, but not the bars of other states. Thank you. From: Brad Edwards [ Sent: Frida January 02, 2015 8:32 AM To: (USAFLS); Paul Cassell Subject: RE: Meeting in January 2015 The longer we wait to pick a date the more difficult it gets for Paul and • to make travel arrangements. We would like to make sure to meet sometime in January. Please get back to me. Sincerely, Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos Et Lehrman, P.L. Brad Edwards Board Certified Trial Attorney 425 North Andrews Avenue. Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 Toll Free: 800.400.1098 I Local: 954-524-2820 Cell: 954-294-9544 I Facsimile: 954-524-2822 I www.pathtojustice.com From: (USAFLS) [mailto: Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2014 6:19 PM To: Brad Edwards; Paul Cassell (- Subject: RE: Meeting in January 2015 EFTA00210983 Brad and Paul, We will let you know which dates are good for us. We actually wanted to discuss adding the new parties to the case at the meeting. Our position is that we oppose adding new petitioners at this stage of the litigation. Best Wishes for a wonderful holiday to you and your families. From: Brad Edwards [mailto Sent: Monda December 22, 2014 12:17 PM To: (USAFLS); Paul Cassell ( Subject: RE: Meeting in January 2015 ) We have a few available dates to choose from. January 21-22 and 28-29. Hopefully one of those will work for you guys. On the motion to add Nand MJ, I don't believe you indicated your position. As we said, we hoped you would agree, or at least not oppose, but either way we would like to know your position so that we can so inform the Court. Thanks again. Please let me know which meeting date works best so that those coming from out of town can make arrangements. Sincerely, Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos Et Lehrman, P.L. Brad Edwards Board Certified Trial Attorney •.wew.pathtojustice.com From: (USAFLS) Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2014 3:03 PM To: Brad Edwards; Paul Cassell ( Subject: Meeting in January 2015 Brad and Paul, EFTA00210984 We would like to schedule a meeting with the Executive Division, as you requested, for January 2015, at a time convenient for both of you. Also, do rsill and • wish to attend? Please let me know of a suitable time for all parties who wish to attend. Thanks. EFTA00210985

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing,

Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos £t Lehrman, P.L. 'Ovid Pam ftoisl pet WWW.PATITTOJUSTKE.COM 425 North Andrews Avenue • Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 4 00 "ti e 6.‘ tk i r atire CalkAllfle alvdtr aIINNEV rar ,NYTTENNINIP PITNEY 'OWES 02 !F $003 , 50 0 000i3V, wit JAN 2i 2,2!3 .a4P En M ZIP t20-12E 3330 Dexter Lee A. Marie Villafatia 500 S. Australian Ave., Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 EFTA00191396 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, 1. UNITED STATES, Respondent. SEALED DOCUMENT EFTA00191397 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, UNITED STATES, Respondent. SEALED DOCUMENT MOTION TO SEAL Petitioners Jane Doc No. 1 and Jane Doe No. 2, joined by movants Jane Doe No. 3 and Jane Doe No. 4, move to file the attached pleading and supporti

71p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Dershowitz’s Unproduced ‘Absolute Proof’ Documents and Media Claims in Epstein‑Related Defamation Litigation

The filing reveals that Alan Dershowitz repeatedly asserted on national TV that he possessed travel, credit‑card and other records proving he never met Jane Doe #3, yet has failed to produce any such Dershowitz claimed on Fox Business (Jan 7 2015) and CNN (Jan 5 2015) to have "all kinds of records" Despite a 45‑day deadline, he produced no documents and responded only with boilerplate objections

26p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 225-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/16/2013 Page 1 of 64

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 225-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/16/2013 Page 1 of 64 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE No. 1 and JANE DOE No. 2 v. UNITED STATES AFFIDAVIT OF BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, ESQ. REGARDING NEED FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS 1. I, Bradley J. Edwards, Esq., do hereby declare that I am a member in good standing of the Bar of the State of Florida. Along with co-counsel, I represent Jane Doe No. 1 and Jane Doe No. 2 (as referred to as "the victims") in the above-listed action to enforce their rights under the Crime Victims Rights Act (CVRA). I also represented them (and several other victims) in civil suits against Jeffrey Epstein for sexually abusing them. I am also familiar with the criminal justice system, having served as state prosecutor in the Broward County State Attorney's Office. 2. This affidavit covers factual issues regarding the Government's assertions of privilege to more tha

64p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 225-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/16/2013 Page 1 of 64

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 225-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/16/2013 Page 1 of 64 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE No. 1 and JANE DOE No. 2 v. UNITED STATES AFFIDAVIT OF BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, ESQ. REGARDING NEED FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS I. I, Bradley J. Edwards, Esq., do hereby declare that I am a member in good standing of the Bar of the State of Florida. Along with co-counsel, I represent Jane Doe No. 1 and Jane Doe No. 2 (as referred to as "the victims") in the above-listed action to enforce their rights under the Crime Victims Rights Act (CVRA). I also represented them (and several other victims) in civil suits against Jeffrey Epstein for sexually abusing them. I am also familiar with the criminal justice system, having served as state prosecutor in the Broward County State Attorney's Office. 2. This affidavit covers factual issues regarding the Government's assertions of privilege to more tha

64p
House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

Virginia Roberts v. Alan Dershowitz – Allegations of Sex Trafficking, NPA Manipulation, and Defamation

The complaint provides a dense web of alleged connections between Alan Dershowitz, Jeffrey Epstein, former U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta, and the 2008 non‑prosecution agreement (NPA). It cites specif Roberts alleges she was trafficked by Epstein from 2000‑2002 and forced to have sex with Dershowitz. Dershowitz is accused of helping draft and pressure the government into the 2008 NPA that shielded

87p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

S.J. QUINNEY

Ul S.J. QUINNEY COLLEGE OF LAW TI IC UNIVERSITY OF UTAH Metropolitan Police Service New Scotland Yard 8-10 Broadway London SW1H 0BG United Kingdom PAUL G. CASSELL Ronald N. Boyce Presidential Professor of Criminal Law May 4, 2015 Re: International Sex Trafficking by Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell Dear Metropolitan Police: I write on behalf of my client — . She is the victim of an international sex trafficking crime in London shortly before March 13, 2001. In the following weeks (and much earlier), the crimes also continued into the United States, specifically New York City, New York, and the U.S. Virgin Islands. The perpetrators of these crimes include: (1) Jeffrey Epstein, a billionaire (and convicted sex offender) who is a citizen of the United States residing in New York City; (2) Ghislaine Maxwell, a well-to-do citizen of the United Kingdom who moved to the United States after the death of her father, Robert Maxwell; and (3) others known and unknown.

51p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.