Stephen Flatley
Forensic Examiner for the Federal Bureau of Investigation
Mentioned in 4 documents. Roles: Forensic Examiner for the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Computer Forensic Examiner, FBI's Computer Analysis Response Team, Government expert witness
Stephen Flatley is mentioned in documents or reporting related to the Epstein case. Being mentioned does not imply any wrongdoing, criminal conduct, or inappropriate behavior.
At a Glance
Click values for sourcesSources
5 sources for document mentions
The document is a letter from the U.S. Department of Justice to Judge Alison J. Nathan arguing again...
“The document is a letter from the U.S. Department of Justice to Judge Alison J. Nathan arguing again”
The letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office to defense counsel outlines the expected testimony of Com...
“The letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office to defense counsel outlines the expected testimony of Com”
This letter, dated November 27, 2021, is from defense attorney Laura A. Menninger to the prosecution...
“This letter, dated November 27, 2021, is from defense attorney Laura A. Menninger to the prosecution”
The defense is objecting to the government's late disclosure of expert opinion testimony by Stephen ...
“The defense is objecting to the government's late disclosure of expert opinion testimony by Stephen ”
court filing: 701
“The document is a letter from the U.S. Department of Justice to Judge Alison J. Nathan arguing again”
Sources
1 source for known connections
Co-Document Mentions
“Named alongside other network members in 21 documents”
Known Connections (7)
Document Mentions (8)
The document is a letter from the U.S. Department of Justice to Judge Alison J. Nathan arguing again...
The document is a letter from the U.S. Department of Justice to Judge Alison J. Nathan arguing against the defense's motion to preclude testimony by FBI Forensic Examiner Stephen Flatley, asserting that his testimony is fact-based and not expert opinion, and that even if it were considered expert testimony, the prosecution provided sufficient notice under Rule 16.
The letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office to defense counsel outlines the expected testimony of Com...
The letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office to defense counsel outlines the expected testimony of Computer Forensic Examiner Stephen Flatley regarding his analysis of digital devices and metadata. Flatley's testimony is expected to cover the forensic examination of devices, the process of creating 'clones' of digital media, and the analysis of metadata associated with certain files. The government asserts that Flatley's testimony is based on his first-hand knowledge and does not require expert testimony under Rule 702 of the Federal Rules of Evidence.
This letter, dated November 27, 2021, is from defense attorney Laura A. Menninger to the prosecution...
This letter, dated November 27, 2021, is from defense attorney Laura A. Menninger to the prosecution team in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. It provides a supplement to the disclosure for Certified Forensic Examiner Robert Kelso's expert opinion, detailing his anticipated testimony on metadata analysis. The letter also objects to the government's untimely supplemental notice for their expert witness, Stephen Flatley.
The defense is objecting to the government's late disclosure of expert opinion testimony by Stephen ...
The defense is objecting to the government's late disclosure of expert opinion testimony by Stephen Flatley, arguing that it was untimely and should be precluded. The government had previously claimed Flatley would only offer fact testimony, but the defense argues that the November 26, December 3, and December 5 disclosures reveal expert opinion testimony.
court filing: 701
The document is a letter from the U.S. Department of Justice to Judge Alison J. Nathan arguing against the defense's motion to preclude testimony by FBI Forensic Examiner Stephen Flatley, asserting that his testimony is fact-based and not expert opinion, and that even if it were considered expert testimony, the prosecution provided sufficient notice under Rule 16.
Court Filing - Letter from Prosecutor to Defense Counsel: 701-1
The letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office to defense counsel outlines the expected testimony of Computer Forensic Examiner Stephen Flatley regarding his analysis of digital devices and metadata. Flatley's testimony is expected to cover the forensic examination of devices, the process of creating 'clones' of digital media, and the analysis of metadata associated with certain files. The government asserts that Flatley's testimony is based on his first-hand knowledge and does not require expert testimony under Rule 702 of the Federal Rules of Evidence.
Letter: 701-2
This letter, dated November 27, 2021, is from defense attorney Laura A. Menninger to the prosecution team in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. It provides a supplement to the disclosure for Certified Forensic Examiner Robert Kelso's expert opinion, detailing his anticipated testimony on metadata analysis. The letter also objects to the government's untimely supplemental notice for their expert witness, Stephen Flatley.
Court Filing: 715
The defense is objecting to the government's late disclosure of expert opinion testimony by Stephen Flatley, arguing that it was untimely and should be precluded. The government had previously claimed Flatley would only offer fact testimony, but the defense argues that the November 26, December 3, and December 5 disclosures reveal expert opinion testimony.
This dossier on Stephen Flatley was compiled from court records, flight logs, and public documents. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.