(USAFLS)"
From: (USAFLS)" To: SAFLS)" SAFLS)" (USAFLS)" Cc: (USAFLS)" Subject: FW: What is the status of our request for the 302s + meeting before filings Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2015 15:10:17 +0000 Importance: Normal Inline-Images: image001.png; image002.png; image003jpg; image004.png This is the latest from Cassell. I contacted the FBI FOIA unit yesterday morning regarding any FOIA request from Cassell seeking FBI 302's for . At 11:15 am, they responded that they did have 302's responsive to the request, and would be willing to expedite the request if it would help us. I asked them to please do so. They did tell me that they would be redacting third party information from the 302's under the privacy exemptions in the FOIA. I take this to mean they will be redacting the names of persons claimed sexually abused her. I will follow up with the FBI this morning. Cassell also wants to meet with us before we file a response to their motion to add parties, and to Dershowitz's motion
Summary
From: (USAFLS)" To: SAFLS)" SAFLS)" (USAFLS)" Cc: (USAFLS)" Subject: FW: What is the status of our request for the 302s + meeting before filings Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2015 15:10:17 +0000 Importance: Normal Inline-Images: image001.png; image002.png; image003jpg; image004.png This is the latest from Cassell. I contacted the FBI FOIA unit yesterday morning regarding any FOIA request from Cassell seeking FBI 302's for . At 11:15 am, they responded that they did have 302's responsive to the request, and would be willing to expedite the request if it would help us. I asked them to please do so. They did tell me that they would be redacting third party information from the 302's under the privacy exemptions in the FOIA. I take this to mean they will be redacting the names of persons claimed sexually abused her. I will follow up with the FBI this morning. Cassell also wants to meet with us before we file a response to their motion to add parties, and to Dershowitz's motion
Persons Referenced (6)
“...y appreciate your help on this. Paul Cassell and Brad Edwards, co-counsel for Jane Does Nos. 1 through 4 Paul G. Cassell Ronald N. Boyce Presidential Professor of Cr...”
Bradley EdwardsJane Doe #1“...really shouldn't be a problem to treat Jane Doe #3 the same way you all treated Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2, can it? In any event, please just let us know as soon as you...”
Paul Cassell“..."right to confer". Thanks in advance for your help on both of these points. Paul Cassell and Brad Edwards for Jane Doe #3 EFTA00210976 Paul G. Cassell Ronald N. Boyc...”
Alan Dershowitz“...s any response to the our pending motion to add JD#3 to the case, as well as to Alan Dershowitz's motion to intervene. We would like for your Office to hear directly JD#3's position on these pending ...”
Jane Doe #2“...be a problem to treat Jane Doe #3 the same way you all treated Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2, can it? In any event, please just let us know as soon as you can. We would really appreciate your help on ...”
Tags
Ask AI About This Document
Extracted Text (OCR)
Technical Artifacts (2)
View in Artifacts BrowserEmail addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.
www.oathteusdce.comRelated Documents (6)
Court filings reveal alleged non‑prosecution agreement with Jeffrey Epstein and references to high‑profile political figures
The document contains sworn declarations and court orders that reference a secret non‑prosecution agreement (NPA) with Jeffrey Epstein, claims that the U.S. Government concealed it from victims, and m Petitioners allege the Government violated victims' rights under the Crime Victims' Rights Act by hi Court order strikes detailed allegations but acknowledges they exist in the filings. Jane Doe 3’s
Dershowitz’s Unproduced ‘Absolute Proof’ Documents and Media Claims in Epstein‑Related Defamation Litigation
The filing reveals that Alan Dershowitz repeatedly asserted on national TV that he possessed travel, credit‑card and other records proving he never met Jane Doe #3, yet has failed to produce any such Dershowitz claimed on Fox Business (Jan 7 2015) and CNN (Jan 5 2015) to have "all kinds of records" Despite a 45‑day deadline, he produced no documents and responded only with boilerplate objections
Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing,
Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos £t Lehrman, P.L. 'Ovid Pam ftoisl pet WWW.PATITTOJUSTKE.COM 425 North Andrews Avenue • Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 4 00 "ti e 6.‘ tk i r atire CalkAllfle alvdtr aIINNEV rar ,NYTTENNINIP PITNEY 'OWES 02 !F $003 , 50 0 000i3V, wit JAN 2i 2,2!3 .a4P En M ZIP t20-12E 3330 Dexter Lee A. Marie Villafatia 500 S. Australian Ave., Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 EFTA00191396 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, 1. UNITED STATES, Respondent. SEALED DOCUMENT EFTA00191397 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, UNITED STATES, Respondent. SEALED DOCUMENT MOTION TO SEAL Petitioners Jane Doc No. 1 and Jane Doe No. 2, joined by movants Jane Doe No. 3 and Jane Doe No. 4, move to file the attached pleading and supporti
Dershowitz Seeks Intervention in Epstein Victims’ CVRA Case, Citing Alleged False Accusations Involving Clinton, Gore, and Prince Andrew
The filing outlines a contested claim that Alan Dershowitz was defamed in a victim‑rights case and references unverified allegations that former President Bill Clinton, former Vice President Al Gore, Dershowitz argues the allegations against him were fabricated and surfaced only in a 2014 joinder mo The brief cites Jane Doe #3’s sworn statements claiming Bill Clinton and Al Gore were on Epstein’s
Dershowitz’s Unproduced ‘Absolute Proof’ Documents and Media Claims in Epstein‑Related Defamation Litigation
Dershowitz’s Unproduced ‘Absolute Proof’ Documents and Media Claims in Epstein‑Related Defamation Litigation The filing reveals that Alan Dershowitz repeatedly asserted on national TV that he possessed travel, credit‑card and other records proving he never met Jane Doe #3, yet has failed to produce any such documents after multiple discovery requests. The passage ties Dershowitz to Jeffrey Epstein, Prince Andrew, Bill Clinton and other high‑profile figures, and highlights possible obstruction of discovery and false public statements—both actionable legal leads and potentially explosive public controversy if verified. Key insights: Dershowitz claimed on Fox Business (Jan 7 2015) and CNN (Jan 5 2015) to have "all kinds of records" disproving the allegations.; Despite a 45‑day deadline, he produced no documents and responded only with boilerplate objections.; The motion cites the CVRA claim that Jane Doe #3 alleges sexual trafficking by Epstein, Prince Andrew and Dershowitz.
Alan Dershowitz seeks to modify confidentiality order to use [REDACTED - Survivor] deposition in court
Alan Dershowitz seeks to modify confidentiality order to use [REDACTED - Survivor] deposition in court The filing reveals a procedural move by a high‑profile attorney to access testimony from [REDACTED - Survivor], a key witness in the Epstein‑related allegations. While it connects a well‑known lawyer to the case, it offers no new factual disclosures, financial flows, or direct involvement of senior officials. The lead is moderately useful for tracking litigation strategy but lacks novel or explosive content. Key insights: Dershowitz filed a motion to lift a confidentiality seal on a deposition of [REDACTED - Survivor].; The motion was filed on Feb 3 2016, referencing a Jan 12 2016 confidentiality order.; Dershowitz argues the need to share the testimony with expert witnesses and other parties for his defense.
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.