Skip to content
Case File
d-8427Court UnsealedDeposition

deposition: A-5831

Date
Unknown
Source
Court Unsealed
Reference
File: a-5831
Pages
1
Persons
4

Summary

The document is a deposition transcript where Berke is being questioned about their investigation into potential juror misconduct. Berke is hesitant to speculate and provides limited information based on their personal experience. The questioning attorney, Okula, presses Berke for more definitive answers.

This document is from the epstein-docs Archive.

View Source Collection
Share
PostReddit

Related Documents (6)

Court UnsealedDepositionUnknown

deposition transcript: A-5816

The document is a transcript of the direct examination of Mr. Schoeman, a lawyer at Kramer Levin, who represented Raymond Craig Brubaker in the trial of David Parse. Schoeman discusses his involvement in the trial and the role of his partner Barry Berke. He is questioned about a note from Juror No. 1, Catherine Conrad, read aloud by the Court on May 11, 2011.

1p
Court UnsealedDepositionUnknown

deposition: A-5824

Barry H. Berke testifies about his employment history, including his work as a partner at Kramer, Levin, Naftalis & Frankel and his involvement in the trial of David Parse. He provides details about his background, including his time as a clerk, Federal Defender, and visiting associate professor at NYU. Berke confirms he was a lawyer in the courtroom during the trial of David Parse.

1p
Court UnsealedTestimonyUnknown

court transcript: A-5823

The transcript captures the redirect examination of Mr. Schoeman, where he discusses a conversation with Ms. Trzaskoma regarding Juror No. 1's status as a suspended attorney. The court and attorneys explore the context and significance of this conversation. The witness is then excused, and the next witness, Barry Berke, is called.

1p
Court UnsealedTestimonyUnknown

court transcript: 1:20-cr-00303-PAE Document 611 Filed 02/24/22

The transcript shows the redirect examination of witness Ms. Edelstein, with the court asking questions about the disclosure of information regarding Juror No. 1 and whether the law firm would have disclosed it without the court's inquiry or the government's action. The witness responds that they thought it would come out at some point during the proceedings.

1p
Court UnsealedTestimonyUnknown

Court Transcript: 6152/20

The prosecution rests its case after submitting Government Exhibit 10 into evidence without objection. The defense then calls its first witness, Paul Schoeman, to testify.

1p
Court UnsealedTestimonyUnknown

Court Transcript: 64432

The transcript is of a court proceeding where Ms. Edelstein is being questioned about her law firm's handling of information regarding Juror No. 1, including whether they would have disclosed it to the Court if not prompted. The discussion also touches on whether they considered raising it as an appellate issue.

2p

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.