Skip to content
Case File
d-8432Court UnsealedTestimony

court transcript: A-5837

Date
Unknown
Source
Court Unsealed
Reference
File: a-5837
Pages
1
Persons
4

Summary

The court transcript shows a discussion between the judge and counsel (MR. SHECHTMAN and MR. OKULA) regarding scheduling initial briefs, with dates set for March 23rd and April 5th. The judge adjourns the hearing, thanking counsel for their professionalism. The transcript ends with the court being adjourned.

This document is from the epstein-docs Archive.

View Source Collection
Share
PostReddit

Related Documents (6)

Court UnsealedTestimonyUnknown

court transcript: A-5836

The court discusses scheduling for the submission of briefs with counsel, accommodating Mr. Okula's vacation and Mr. Shechtman's month-long trial, ultimately setting a deadline of March 23 for initial briefs.

1p
Court UnsealedTestimonyUnknown

court transcript: 1:20-cr-00303-PAE Document 611 Filed 02/24/22

The transcript shows the redirect examination of witness Ms. Edelstein, with the court asking questions about the disclosure of information regarding Juror No. 1 and whether the law firm would have disclosed it without the court's inquiry or the government's action. The witness responds that they thought it would come out at some point during the proceedings.

1p
Court UnsealedTestimonyUnknown

court transcript: 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 161 Filed 02/24/22 Page 63 of 117

The transcript captures a discussion between the court and lawyer MR. SHECHTMAN regarding the alleged lack of candor by lawyers Brune & Richard and whether their actions were circumstantial evidence of a strategic decision to game the system.

1p
Court UnsealedTestimonyUnknown

Court Transcript: 6152/20

The prosecution rests its case after submitting Government Exhibit 10 into evidence without objection. The defense then calls its first witness, Paul Schoeman, to testify.

1p
Court UnsealedTestimonyUnknown

Court Transcript: 64432

The transcript is of a court proceeding where Ms. Edelstein is being questioned about her law firm's handling of information regarding Juror No. 1, including whether they would have disclosed it to the Court if not prompted. The discussion also touches on whether they considered raising it as an appellate issue.

2p
Court UnsealedTestimonyUnknown

court transcript: A-5669

The transcript details the cross-examination of a witness, Ms. Conrad, who apologized for misrepresenting herself during jury selection. The court discusses the implications of her testimony and decides to release her from an arrest warrant. The transcript also covers the scheduling of the trial and the testimony of other witnesses.

2p

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.