Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Case 1:22-cv-10019-JSR Document 36 Filed 01/13/23 Page 1 of 130
Jane Doe 1, individually and on
)
behalf of all others similarly
)
situated
)
)
Plaintiffs,
)
)
)
v.
)
)
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.,
)
)
Defendant.
)
Case No.: 22-cv-10019-JSR
Plaintiff Jane Doe 1 files this first amended individual and civil class action
complaint for damages and other relief under (among other provisions of law) the
United States federal anti-sex trafficking statute, 18 U.S.C. § 1591, et seq.—the
Trafficking Victim Protection Act ("TVPA")—and for aiding and abetting,
intentional infliction of emotional distress, and negligence related to sexual offenses
as defined in article one hundred thirty of the penal law, pursuant to the New York
Adult Survivors Act, N.Y. CPLR §214-j. The suit arises from Defendant JP Morgan
Chase Bank, N.A.'s (hereinafter "JP Morgan") participation and intentional
involvement in Jeffrey Epstein's widespread and well-publicized sex-trafficking
operation, as well as the direct financial benefits it received therefrom.
JP Morgan knew that it was providing the financial lifeblood for Epstein's
1
EFTA00162121
Case 1:22-cv-10019-JSR Document 36 Filed 01/13/23 Page 2 of 130
international sex-trafficking organization from 1998 through August 2013. In
exchange for that crucial financial support, JP Morgan knowingly and intentionally
benefited and received things of value from Epstein and his sex-trafficking
operation. And that crucial financial support allowed Epstein to successfully rape,
sexually assault, and coercively sex traffic Jane Doe 1 and the numerous other
members of the Class proposed below (the "Class"). JP Morgan knew that Epstein
was regularly committing violations of New York Penal Law Art. 130, including,
and especially, New York Penal Law §§ 130.20, 130.35, 130.50, 130.52, and 130.66,
and acted to enable, aid and abet, and facilitate Epstein's commission of such
offenses against countless young women, including Jane Doe 1 and Class Members.
JP Morgan also knew that Epstein would use means of force, threats of force,
fraud, abuse of legal process, exploitation of power disparity, and a variety of other
forms of coercion to cause young women and girls to engage in commercial sex acts.
Knowing that it would earn millions of dollars in exchange for facilitating Epstein's
sex abuse and trafficking, JP Morgan chose profits over following the law.
Specifically, JP Morgan chose participating in and facilitating Epstein's sex-
trafficking conspiracy for many years, including through the criminal investigation
and incarceration of Jeffrey Epstein, in order to churn profits.
Jane Doe 1 makes the following allegations on information and belief and
believes that substantial additional evidentiary support will exist for the allegations
2
EFTA00162122
Case 1:22-cv-10019-JSR Document 36 Filed 01/13/23 Page 3 of 130
set forth herein after a reasonable opportunity for discovery:
1.
This action is brought pursuant to various federal and state statues,
including the federal TWA, 18 U.S.C. § 1589 through § 1595. This Court has
federal question subject-matter jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1331, because
Jane Doe 1—individually and on behalf of the other Class members—proceeds
under the federal TVPA statute.
2.
This Court also has supplemental jurisdiction over the state law claims
recounted below pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1367(a), because all claims alleged herein
are part of a uniform pattern and practice and form part of the same case or
controversy.
3.
This Court is "an appropriate district court of the United States" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. § 1595, in which to bring this action. Venue is proper in
this District under 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2), because Epstein, his co-conspirators, and
JP Morgan all conducted substantial activities in this District and knowingly aided
and abetted, facilitated, and directly participated in Epstein's illegal venture through
actions that originated in this District. In addition, Epstein sexually abused and
trafficked Jane Doe 1 and members of the Class is this District.
4.
Often these acts of sexual abuse and commercial sex acts, committed
by Jeffrey Epstein and certain select friends of his, took place in Jeffrey Epstein's
3
EFTA00162123
Case 1:22-cv-10019-JSR Document 36 Filed 01/13/23 Page 4 of 130
New York mansion, located within this District at 9 East 71st Street in New York
City. Epstein also used his New York mansion to harbor his victims and as a base
from which to transport them to other locations outside of New York.
5.
A substantial part of the acts, events, and omissions giving rise to this
cause of action occurred in this District.
6.
This action has been timely filed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1595(c)(1),
which provides that a plaintiff shall have ten years after the cause of action arose to
file suit against any person who knowingly benefits, financially or by receiving
anything of value from participation in a venture which that person knew or should
have known violated the laws against sex trafficking. This action is also timely
because the conspiracy continued until recently. This action is also timely under
New York's Adult Survivor's Act, N.Y. CPLR § 214-j.
II. PARTIES
7.
Jane Doe 1 is a U.S. citizen and was at all relevant times a resident of
and domiciled in the State of New York.
8.
Plaintiff Jane Doe 1 is using a pseudonym to protect her identity
because of the sensitive and highly personal nature of this matter, which involves
sexual assault.
9.
Jane Doe 1 is also at serious risk of retaliatory harm because the co-
conspirators who participated in the Epstein sex-trafficking venture had—and
4
EFTA00162124
Case 1:22-cv-10019-JSR Document 36 Filed 01/13/23 Page 5 of 130
continue to possess—tremendous wealth and power and have demonstrated a clear
ability to cause her serious harm.
10.
Jane Doe l's safety, right to privacy, and security outweigh the public
interest in her identification.
11.
Jane Doe l's legitimate concerns outweigh any prejudice to Defendant
by allowing her to proceed anonymously.
12.
As discussed below, many other women are similarly situated to Jane
Doe 1 and also need to proceed anonymously for the same reasons. The identities of
most of these other women are known to Defendant.
13.
Defendant HI Morgan is a global financial institution headquartered in
New York, New York.
14.
Defendant JP Morgan is licensed by the New York State Department
of Financial Services to operate a foreign bank branch in the State of New York.
15.
Defendant JP Morgan currently conducts substantial business in this
District and conducted substantial business at the time of events covered in this
complaint.
16.
As one example of business conducted in this District, JP Morgan
ordinarily trades shares on the New York Stock Exchange, located in this District.
As another example, JP Morgan maintains branch banks within this District.
17.
JP Morgan's financial activities, including the events alleged herein,
5
EFTA00162125
Case 1:22-cv-10019-JSR Document 36 Filed 01/13/23 Page 6 of 130
were in and affecting interstate and foreign commerce. In connection with the acts
alleged in this complaint, Defendant, directly or indirectly, used the means and
instrumentalities of interstate commerce, including, but not limited to, the mails,
interstate telephone communications, and the facilities of national securities
markets.
18.
JP Morgan is responsible, under United States law and otherwise, for
the acts of its officers, directors, employees, and agents, including the acts described
in this complaint. The acts alleged were committed by JP Morgan's officers,
directors, employees, and agents were within actual and apparent scope of their
employment and with the intention, at least in part, to benefit JP Morgan.
19.
Jeffrey Epstein's sex-trafficking venture operated in many respects as
a sex-themed cult designed to ensnare vulnerable young women and indoctrinate
them into Epstein's carefully constructed world in which Epstein was their messiah.
Epstein and his co-conspirators preached the gospel of Epstein. Epstein's victims
were taught to do what he said, and he would protect them; but disobey him, and he
would punish them; and continue to disobey, and he would cause them serious harm
from which they could never recover.
20.
Once in Epstein's clutches, each victim was taught and understood that
she must be completely compliant with every demand Epstein had for her; otherwise,
6
EFTA00162126
Case 1:22-cv-10019-JSR Document 36 Filed 01/13/23 Page 7 of 130
she would certainly suffer serious reputational, financial, and psychological harm.
By using these and other means of force, threats of force, fraud, threats of abuse of
the legal process and coercion, Epstein and his co-conspirators sexually trafficked
and sexually abused Jane Doe 1 and the other members of the Class.
21.
The Epstein sex-trafficking venture originated in the early 1990's.
From its inception until Jeffrey Epstein's arrest by the FBI for sex trafficking in 2019
(and his subsequent death on August 10, 2019, by apparent suicide), the venture
operated primarily for the purpose of luring young women and girls into a position
where Jeffrey Epstein and his co-conspirators could coerce them to engage in
commercial sex acts and commit sexual offenses against them. His venture also
operated to conceal its sex trafficking from law enforcement organizations. And his
venture provided financial and other benefits to those who assisted and enabled the
venture.
22.
The Epstein sex-trafficking venture was well-structured from the
beginning and grew increasingly more complex and powerful as it victimized more
young women and as its relationship with Defendant JP Morgan grew.
23.
Epstein could not and did not act alone. He created and maintained his
sex-trafficking venture with the assistance of other influential individuals and
entities who knew he was sexually abusing and sexually trafficking young women
and girls and provided support to facilitate his sexual abuse and sex trafficking
7
EFTA00162127
Case 1:22-cv-10019-JSR Document 36 Filed 01/13/23 Page 8 of 130
operation.
24.
Epstein's sex-trafficking venture was not possible without the
assistance and complicity of a financial institution—specifically, a banking
institution—which provided special treatment to Jeffrey Epstein and the sex-
trafficking venture, thereby ensuring its continued operation and sexual abuse and
sex-trafficking of young women and girls. Without the financial institution's
participation, Epstein's sex trafficking scheme could not have existed and flourished.
25.
Epstein's victims were young women and girls, who suffered severe
abuse as Epstein's sex-trafficking victims and who believed they had to remain loyal
to the venture at all costs to survive. Epstein victimized hundreds of young women
and girls with the assistance of a wide network of co-conspirators, including JP
Morgan.
26.
Epstein's sexual abuse and sex trafficking scheme was supported by
virtually unlimited wealth, derived from select wealthy individuals who acted as the
financial engine behind the sex-trafficking operation, in exchange for sexual and
other benefits.
27.
Epstein masterfully assessed the specific needs and vulnerability of
each of his targeted victims. He then closed the trap on his victims with offers of
money, food, shelter, medical care for them or family members, travel, schooling,
and career opportunities.
Epstein groomed the young women and girls,
8
EFTA00162128
Case 1:22-cv-10019-JSR Document 36 Filed 01/13/23 Page 9 of 130
indoctrinating them to believe that the sexual abuse was normal.
28.
Epstein fraudulently represented to the victims that he would take care
of them in various ways, which ultimately allowed Epstein to cause them to engage
in commercial sex acts with himself and, on occasion, select others, as well as to
create the opportunity for Epstein to sexually abuse them.
29.
The Epstein sex-trafficking venture's purpose included enticing,
obtaining, harboring, and transporting the young victims without drawing unwanted
attention from law enforcement. The venture had everything a sex-trafficking
organization needed—funding, infrastructure, the appearance of legitimacy, and a
complicit banking institution. It was by many accounts the most powerful and
wealthiest sex-trafficking venture ever created.
30.
The Epstein sex-trafficking venture knowingly used means of force,
threats of force, fraud, coercion (including threats of serious harm or physical
restraint), and abuse of law and the legal process, to cause Jane Doe 1, and many
dozens of others similarly situated women to engage in commercial sex acts.
31.
The Epstein sex-trafficking venture operated in and affected interstate
and foreign commerce. Epstein recruited, solicited, coerced, harbored, transported,
and enticed some of his victims, including Jane Doe 1 and others similarly situated,
to engage in commercial sex acts in, among other places, New York (including the
Southern District of New York), Florida, the U.S. Virgin Islands, New Mexico,
9
EFTA00162129
Case 1:22-cv-10019-JSR Document 36 Filed 01/13/23 Page 10 of 130
England, and France.
32.
The Epstein sex-trafficking venture operated throughout the world from
in and around (at least) 1998 through (at least) in and around August 10, 2019, when
Epstein died by apparent suicide. Thereafter, through at least July 2020, to and
including the date of this complaint, members of the sex-trafficking venture
continued to further the venture by concealing the activities and extent of the
venture.
33.
The manner of operation for Epstein's particular sexual abuse and sex
trafficking operation was widely publicized. He would lure young girls or women
to one of his luxurious mansions, under the guise of being a wealthy philanthropist,
able to advance careers, education, or provide other life necessities, and once inside
he would force his would-be victim into providing a massage that would turn sexual,
and from there he would cause each of his unsuspecting victims to engage in a
variety of commercial sex acts.
34.
Once in his presence, each victim knew it was no option to disobey
Epstein. It was well known and understood that he was one of the most powerful
and connected people in the United States, able to help any of these young victims
and capable and willing to seriously harm any of his victims.
35.
While Epstein's abuse began in the early 1990s with the use of his
paramour turned madame, Ghislaine Maxwell ("Maxwell"), Epstein's appetite for
10
EFTA00162130
Case 1:22-cv-10019-JSR Document 36 Filed 01/13/23 Page 11 of 130
sexually abusing young women and girls grew over the years.
36.
By (at least) 1998, Epstein's sex trafficking venture had crystalized into
criminal conspiracy. By 1998, each victim was being directed to recruit other
vulnerable victims and being paid handsomely, typically in cash, for each
recruitment, creating a pyramid scheme of abuse.
37.
A Florida criminal investigation uncovered that the number of victims
of Epstein's sex-trafficking conspiracy grew exponentially in and around the early
2000s.
38.
While Epstein did pay victims and his many co-conspirators using wire
transfers and checks, because there were hundreds of victims, Epstein could not pay
all of his victims with traceable wires.
39.
One primary reason why Epstein's sex-trafficking venture and
conspiracy accumulated new victims at an alarming rate in the late 1990s and
accelerated even faster by 2000 was Epstein's access to unlimited amounts of cash
and his knowledge that he had a complicit bank—JP Morgan—through which he
could operate his illegal abuse organization without fear of being reported to law
enforcement.
40.
Without exorbitantly large amounts of cash, Epstein's operation could
not effectively operate, as newly recruited victims were each paid hundreds of
dollars in cash immediately after Epstein sexually abused them, as hush money.
11
EFTA00162131
Case 1:22-cv-10019-JSR Document 36 Filed 01/13/23 Page 12 of 130
41.
Each victim was also informed that she would be paid hundreds of
dollars in cash for each additional victim she recruited, and Epstein made good on
those promises of large cash payments to keep his victims quiet and complicit.
42.
The public documents and articles stemming from the 2006 arrest made
abundantly clear that Epstein was doling out thousands of dollars in cash every
single day as hush money to victims he was sexually abusing and to victims he was
using to recruit additional victims.
43.
If Epstein paid every victim with wire transfers or checks and left a
documented money trail, his illegal sexual abuse and sex trafficking operation would
have been easily uncovered; however, with access to unlimited amounts of cash,
Epstein was able to commit the most egregious sexual crimes many times a day
without leaving a paper trail.
44.
Accordingly, Epstein's constant expansion of sexual abuse and
trafficking required cash on hand for Epstein to pay each victim as hush money for
the abuse she was suffering as well as each victim's finder's fee for bringing another
victim.
45.
To access the large amount of cash needed to maintain his active sexual
abuse of young women, it was essential that the financial institution where he banked
be complicit in his operation, and more specifically that Epstein bank at a financial
institution that would allow him to constantly withdraw cash from his accounts
12
EFTA00162132
Case 1:22-cv-10019-JSR Document 36 Filed 01/13/23 Page 13 of 130
without following anti-money laundering and reporting laws.
46.
To put it plainly, Epstein needed a bank that knew he was engaging in
illegal activity and did not care, which Epstein had in JP Morgan.
47.
This scheme of paying victims to recruit other victims worked
effectively for Epstein. It not only allowed expansion through the recruitment of
other victims in a pyramid scheme or spiderweb fashion, but it also gave each victim
hope that she could avoid future sexual abuse—she could bring someone else who
would get abused in her place.
48.
Epstein's aptitude as a sex-trafficker and appetite as a sexual abuser did
not suffer because of his Florida incarceration in 2008. Even while he was in jail in
Florida, Epstein brazenly continued to sexually abuse young girls and women from
his work-release office.
49.
Once out of jail and off work release, Epstein continued to collect
young women and lure them through force, fraud, or coercion into one of his
mansions, primarily his townhouse located at 9 East 71 Street, New York, NY,
where he would sexually abuse each one.
50.
Epstein's sexual abuse and sex-trafficking operation continued as it had
in the past, although it became more elaborate, creating more phony companies,
opening more bank accounts, withdrawing excessive amounts of cash, and
delivering money to victims through wires, payroll, direct deposits, and other means
13
EFTA00162133
Case 1:22-cv-10019-JSR Document 36 Filed 01/13/23 Page 14 of 130
known to his financial institution as evidence of the continuation of his criminal sex
trafficking scheme.
51.
As time went by, especially after Epstein's Florida arrest, the news
articles and lawsuits about his activities continued to mount. More information
became publicly available that Epstein was continuing to abuse young women and
was using professionals on his payroll to help him conceal his illegal activity and
give him ostensible cover as a purported well-connected money manager.
52.
As a registered sex offender discovered to be sexually abusing multiple
young women each day through a pyramid-type recruiting scheme that required the
transfer of millions of dollars to continue the operation, a complicit bank became
more important than ever.
53.
As further detailed below, JP Morgan worked closely with Epstein
through every step of the sex trafficking operation's expansion and growth in some
of its most prolific of years—between around 1998 through 2013.
54.
The Trafficking Victims Protection Act (TVPA) outlaws sex trafficking
activities that affect interstate or foreign commerce or take place within the territorial
jurisdiction of the United States. It is to be construed broadly because it serves a
remedial purpose and uses intentionally broad language.
55.
The TVPA forbids, among other things, the following sex-trafficking
14
EFTA00162134
Case 1:22-cv-10019-JSR Document 36 Filed 01/13/23 Page 15 of 130
conduct:
(a) Whoever knowingly—
(1) in or affecting interstate or foreign commerce, or within
the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the
United States recruits, entices, harbors, transports,
provides, obtains, advertises, maintains, patronizes, or
solicits by any means a person; or
(2) benefits, financially or by receiving anything of value,
from participation in a venture which has engaged in an
act described in violation of paragraph (1),
knowing, or, except where the act constituting the violation of
paragraph is advertising, in reckless disregard of the fact, that means of
force, threats of force, fraud, coercion described in subsection (e)(2), or
any combination of such means will be used to cause the person to
engage in a commercial sex act, or that the person has not attained the
age of 18 years and will be caused to engage in a commercial sex act,
shall be punished as provided in subsection (b).
18 U.S.C. § 1591(a).
56.
The TVPA also forbids (among other things) conspiring to violate 18
U.S.C. § 1591. 18 U.S.C. § 1594(c).
57.
The TVPA also contains an explicit "civil remedy" provision which
allows an individual who is a victim of a violation of Chapter 77 of Title 18 (e.g.,
violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1591-94) to bring a civil action against the perpetrator and
any person or entity who knowingly benefits, financially or by receiving anything of
value from participation in an illegal sex-trafficking venture. 18 U.S.C. § 1595(a).
58.
Unlike the criminal penalties provisions in the TVPA, the civil
15
EFTA00162135
Case 1:22-cv-10019-JSR Document 36 Filed 01/13/23 Page 16 of 130
remedies provision contains a "constructive knowledge" provision. This provision
allows a civil action to be brought not only against a person or entity who
participated in a venture known to have engaged in illegal sex trafficking but also
against a person or entity who participated in a venture that the person or entity
should have known had engaged in illegal sex trafficking. 18 U.S.C. § 1595(a). This
expansive provision is known as the "constructive knowledge" provision, which
provides an alternative to proving actual knowledge as part of civil damages claim.
59.
In the paragraphs that follow, wherever Jane Doe 1 alleges that
Defendant acted with actual knowledge, or in reckless disregard of the fact, that the
Epstein sex-trafficking venture used means of force, threats of force, fraud, coercion,
abuse of process, or some combination thereof to cause a person to engage in
commercial sex acts, the Plaintiff also allege that, at a bare minimum, Defendant
should have known that the Epstein sex-trafficking venture had used such means to
engage in illegal sex trafficking in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1591-94—Le., that they
had constructive knowledge of Epstein's sex trafficking.
60.
In this complaint, Jane Doe 1 and other members of the Class also
allege that JP Morgan was willfully blind to the fact that was facilitating and
participating in Epstein's sex-trafficking venture.
A.
The Epstein Sex-Trafficking Venture and Conspiracy
16
EFTA00162136
Case 1:22-cv-10019-JSR Document 36 Filed 01/13/23 Page 17 of 130
61.
During all times relevant to this complaint, Jeffrey Epstein was an
extraordinarily wealthy man with multiple residences in the United States, including
a New York City mansion, a Palm Beach mansion, and an island in the U.S. Virgin
Islands.
62.
Beginning in and around 1998 and continuing through the summer of
2019, Jeffrey Epstein knowingly established and ran a sex-trafficking venture and
conspiracy in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1591-95. As part of the venture, Epstein
used means of force, threats of force, fraud, coercion, abuse of legal process, and a
combination of these means to cause young women and girls from all over the world
to engage in commercial sex acts and to sexually abuse them. Epstein and others
also conspired to violate 18 U.S.C. § 1591.
63.
In creating and maintaining this network of victims in multiple states
and in other countries to sexually abuse and exploit, Epstein worked and conspired
with others, including employees and associates who facilitated his conduct by,
among other things, recruiting victims, coercing victims, and scheduling their sexual
abuse by Epstein at his New York mansion, his Palm Beach mansion, and his island
in the U.S. Virgin Islands.
64.
Epstein and his co-conspirators used Epstein's vast (yet mysterious)
wealth and connections to other rich and powerful individuals to lure victims into
his home for seemingly innocuous activity. Victims were initially recruited to speak
17
EFTA00162137
Case 1:22-cv-10019-JSR Document 36 Filed 01/13/23 Page 18 of 130
with an allegedly philanthropic Epstein and provide "massages" to him.
65.
Epstein and his co-conspirators had perfected a scheme for
manipulation and abuse of young females. As part of the scheme, a female
"recruiter" would approach a young female and strike up a conversation in an effort
to quickly learn about the young female's background and any vulnerabilities they
could expose. The recruiter would then manipulate the young female into coming
back to one of Epstein's residences by offering the young female something she
needed. At times, the recruiter's lure would be a modeling opportunity, money for
education, help for the young female's family, and a whole host of other related
offers depending on their target's situation. Once in the residence, the recruiter and
Epstein would work in concert to impress and intimidate the young female with
displays of vast wealth, including having employees that were butlers and maids
formally dressed around the house. They would also strategically place photographs
of very powerful political and social figures amongst photographs and art displaying
nude females in an effort to normalize the sexual abuse. They would normalize the
sexual abuse by placing a massage table and spa related products around the massage
area in an effort to legitimize the area where the abuse was set to occur. Once
abused, Epstein and his co-conspirators continued to manipulate the victims, using
their financial power, promises, and threats to ensure that the victim returned as
directed and remained compliant with their demands.
18
EFTA00162138
Case 1:22-cv-10019-JSR Document 36 Filed 01/13/23 Page 19 of 130
66.
Once at the home and trapped in Epstein's bedroom the victims would
be instructed to remove their clothing. Epstein would then force the massages to
become increasingly sexual in nature, typically including one or more forced sex
acts. Epstein would use means of force, threats of force, or fraud to coerce the
victims to participate in these sex acts and to cause them to return and continue to
engage in commercial sex acts with him. Epstein and his associates then paid his
victims hundreds of dollars in cash for each sexual encounter.
67.
In this District and elsewhere, Epstein perpetuated this pattern of abuse
in similar ways, hundreds of times.
68.
Moreover, Epstein actively encouraged and coerced his victims to
become recruiters themselves, forcing them to recruit additional girls to be similarly
sexually abused and causing the number of victims to grow exponentially. Epstein
incentivized his victims to become recruiters by paying these victim-recruiters
hundreds of dollars for each girl that they brought to Epstein. In so doing, Epstein,
through this system of paying victims to recruit others whom he would in turn pay
to recruit others, created a sexual abuse and sex trafficking spider web and
maintained a steady supply of new victims to exploit.
69.
Epstein was skilled at ascertaining his victim's greatest fears and
aspirations and targeted those fears and aspirations to coerce and trap his victims
into performing commercial sex acts and to be subject to sexual abuse.
19
EFTA00162139
Case 1:22-cv-10019-JSR Document 36 Filed 01/13/23 Page 20 of 130
70.
Among other things, Epstein sexually abused his many victims and
caused his victims to engage in commercial sex acts, specifically sex acts for which
his victims received things of value, including money, promises of educational and
career advancement, a place to live, and promises that Epstein would provide various
forms of assistance.
71.
Epstein provided things of value to his victims in order to coerce them
to engage sex acts with him and on occasion his friends, co-conspirators, or other
victims.
72.
As one means of coercing victims to engage in commercial sex acts,
Epstein and his co-conspirators threatened that harm would come to victims if they
did not comply with his demands that they perform commercial sex acts.
73.
As another means of coercing victims to engage in commercial sex acts,
Epstein and his co-conspirators fraudulently promised to further victims'
educational or career aspirations if they would comply with his sexual demands.
These promises were a quid pro quo for the sex acts that occurred.
74.
As one means of coercing victims to engage in commercial sex acts,
Epstein and his co-conspirators would give his victims money to stay quiet about the
assault or as a "finder's fee" for bringing other young women. Epstein would also
provide them with living accommodations, clothing, education, or other necessities,
exploiting the vulnerabilities of his often poor and underprivileged victims.
20
EFTA00162140
Case 1:22-cv-10019-JSR Document 36 Filed 01/13/23 Page 21 of 130
75.
In addition to coercing commercial sex acts from his victims, Epstein
also committed coercive sexual offenses against them as defined in New York Penal
Law § 130, as described in greater detail below.
76.
Throughout around 1998 through about July 2019, the Epstein's sex-
trafficking venture recruited, solicited, enticed, harbored, obtained, provided, and
transported hundreds of victims to cause them to engage in commercial sex acts with
Epstein and Epstein's friends.
77.
At all relevant times, Epstein maintained numerous apartment units at
301 East 66th Street in New York City, where Epstein's co-conspirators often stayed
and which operated as stash houses where numerous victims were kept over the
years.
78.
JP Morgan knew of the 301 East 66th Street Epstein properties and knew
that these units operated as victim stash houses.
79.
In 2006, Jeffrey Epstein was arrested in Florida after state and federal
law enforcement discovered that he had sexually abused more than 30 children in
his Palm Beach, Florida mansion. During that investigation, the government
concluded that Epstein and his co-conspirators had committed federal criminal acts
constituting violations of the TVPA and other federal laws, including 18 U.S.0 §§
2422(b), 2423(0, 2423(b), 2424 (e); 18 U.S.0 § 371; 18 U.S.0 §§ 1591(c)(1),
1591(a)(1), 1591(a)(2); as well as state crimes in violation of Florida Statutes §§
21
EFTA00162141
Case 1:22-cv-10019-JSR Document 36 Filed 01/13/23 Page 22 of 130
796.07 and 796.03, against dozens of young women.
80.
As a consequence of the Florida investigation, Epstein pled guilty to
two felonies, was permanently labeled a "Registered Sex Offender," and was jailed
in 2008. Epstein also entered into a non-prosecution agreement with the U.S.
Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida barring his prosecution (and
prosecution of his known and unknown co-conspirators) for violations of the TVPA
and other sex offenses in Florida. When the U.S. Attorney's Office entered into that
non-prosecution agreement with Epstein, it had not received reports from JP Morgan
about vast sums of cash that it was providing Epstein. Nor did JP Morgan provide
any other assistance in the investigation.
81.
Epstein's criminal case in Florida and the many related news reports
left no doubt about Jeffrey Epstein and his extraordinary penchant for sex abuse and
trafficking of young females. For instance, it was reported that up until the time of
his Florida arrest in July 2006, Epstein had been sexually abusing during that year
and the previous year three to four young females per day; it was a full-time job for
him.
82.
Beginning with his 2006 Florida arrest and for years moving forward,
Epstein was embroiled in dozens of public lawsuits detailing his sexual abuse of
females, and thousands of news stories circulated worldwide about his illegal sexual
proclivities.
22
EFTA00162142
Case 1:22-cv-10019-JSR Document 36 Filed 01/13/23 Page 23 of 130
83.
Epstein paid millions of dollars to settle sexual abuse lawsuits filed
against him by many victims. The money used to make settlement payments was
paid from Epstein-related entity accounts at JP Morgan. And while he was paying
to settle these claims, Epstein was continuing to abuse new victims—all facts known
to JP Morgan.
84.
In addition to the many civil lawsuits seeking damages for sexual abuse,
Epstein's victims also filed a public lawsuit against the Unites States under 18 U.S.C.
§ 3771, the Crime Victim's Rights Act ("CVRA"), further exposing Epstein's sexual
crimes as well as his secret Non-Prosecution Agreement with the Federal
Government.
85.
Epstein recruited, solicited, enticed, harbored, obtained, provided, and
transported his victims to cause them to engage in commercial sex acts in ways that
were in and affecting interstate and foreign commerce, including using means of
interstate communications (such as cell phones) and means of interstate and foreign
travel (such as aircraft that he owned and controlled).
86.
Epstein transported his victims in interstate and foreign commerce,
including transportation to and from his mansion in this District.
87.
The Epstein sex-trafficking venture transported victims across state
boundaries between New York, Florida, New Mexico, New Jersey, Massachusetts,
the U.S. Virgin Islands, and elsewhere, and in foreign commerce between the United
23
EFTA00162143
Case 1:22-cv-10019-JSR Document 36 Filed 01/13/23 Page 24 of 130
States and Europe, especially Eastern Europe.
88.
At all times relevant to this complaint, the Epstein sex-trafficking
venture was a group of two or more individuals associated in fact, even if they were
not a formal legal entity. Indeed, members of the Epstein sex-trafficking venture
referred to it as "The Organization." Epstein was continuously at the hub of The
Organization, which operated throughout the times indicated in this complaint.
89.
On July 2, 2019, the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern
District of New York filed a sealed, two-count Indictment against Epstein, including
one count of sex trafficking conspiracy and one count of sex trafficking for violations
of 18 U.S.C. § 1591, in part due to Epstein's criminal activities in his New York
Mansion located at 9 East 71st Street. See United States v. Jeffrey Epstein, Case No.
1:19-cr-00490 (S.D.N.Y.).
90.
On July 8, 2019, Epstein was arrested pursuant to the New York
Indictment.
91.
On August 10, 2019, prison guards found Epstein unresponsive in his
Metropolitan Correctional Center jail cell, where was awaiting trial on the federal
sex trafficking charges. He was later pronounced dead from apparent suicide.
92.
In July 2020, Epstein's co-conspirator in the sex-trafficking venture,
Maxwell, was arrested on federal sex-trafficking charges filed in the Southern
District of New York. The charges alleged that she had assisted, facilitated, and
24
EFTA00162144
Case 1:22-cv-10019-JSR Document 36 Filed 01/13/23 Page 25 of 130
contributed to Epstein's abuse of sex-trafficking victims, helping Epstein to recruit,
groom, and ultimately abuse his victims. See United States v. Maxwell, Case No.
1:20-cr-00330 (S.D.N.Y.).
93.
On December 29, 2021, after a weeks-long jury trial during which
witnesses testified about Epstein's sex-trafficking operation in painstaking detail,
Maxwell was found guilty on five federal sex-trafficking counts and is now serving
nearly 20 years in federal prison for these crimes.
B.
Consistent With Jeffrey Epstein's Uniform Pattern and Practice, Jane
Doe 1 Was Forced to Engage in Commercial Sex Acts with Epstein by
Means of Force, Fraud, and Coercion.
94.
Jane Doe I was living with her mother when she met Jeffrey Epstein in
2006.
95.
At that time, Jane Doe I was a ballet dancer in New York. Another
young female who had also fallen prey to Jeffrey Epstein's sex trafficking scheme
recruited Jane Doe 1 to meet Epstein.
96.
Epstein and his co-conspirators had a long history of grooming,
indoctrinating, controlling, and ultimately committing sexual offenses against
young, vulnerable women like Jane Doe I. Epstein and his co-conspirators
constantly reminded Jane Doe 1 how powerful and important Epstein was. Jane Doe
I was chastised if she refused Epstein's sexual demands and told she should be
grateful that Epstein was willing to help her with her career and education. She came
25
EFTA00162145
Case 1:22-cv-10019-JSR Document 36 Filed 01/13/23 Page 26 of 130
to believe what she was told.
97.
The well-oiled Epstein sex abuse and trafficking venture included
frequent statements to Jane Doe I and other victims by Epstein and his
co-conspirators that: (1) Epstein possessed extraordinary wealth, power and
influence; (2) Epstein's business and political friends, including world leaders, also
included some of the most powerful people in the world; (3) Epstein had the ability
to advance or destroy nearly anyone financially, reputationally, and otherwise;
(4) medical and other life necessities would be denied victims if they, including Jane
Doe 1, failed to perform commercial sex acts for Epstein; and (5) Epstein could take
away Jane Doe l's and other victims' life necessities such as shelter or housing if
she or they failed to perform those acts.
98.
Jane Doe I was exceptionally vulnerable to being victimized by
Epstein. His sex-trafficking venture targeted vulnerable young women and Jane Doe
I was soon indoctrinated and unable to extricate herself. Jane Doe 1 was sexually
abused and trafficked by Epstein for several years. Having been conditioned that
the sexual abuse was "normal" and knowing that everyone surrounding Epstein,
including accountants, lawyers, and other important people, were aware of the sex
abuse, Jane Doe 1 was coerced into a cult-like life controlled and manipulated by
Epstein and others doing Epstein's bidding.
99.
Over the ensuing years, from 2006 through 2013, Epstein sexually
26
EFTA00162146
Case 1:22-cv-10019-JSR Document 36 Filed 01/13/23 Page 27 of 130
abused Jane Doe 1 on a number of occasions in New York, Florida, New Mexico,
and the United States Virgin Islands in direct violation of Article 130 of New York's
Penal Law, including but not limited to the following:
a. Sexual misconduct as defined in *130.20, inasmuch as Jeffrey Epstein
engaged in sexual intercourse with Plaintiff without Plaintiff's consent;
b. Rape in the first degree as defined in §130.35, inasmuch as Jeffrey
Epstein engaged in sexual intercourse with Plaintiff by forcible
compulsion;
c. Criminal sexual act in the first degree as defined in §130.50, inasmuch
as Jeffrey Epstein engaged in oral sexual conduct with Plaintiff by
forcible compulsion;
d. Forcible touching as defined in §130.52, inasmuch as Jeffrey Epstein,
intentionally and for no legitimate purpose, engaged in the forcible
sexual touching of Plaintiff for the purpose of degrading or abusing her
or for the purpose of gratifying his own sexual desire; and
e. Sexual abuse in the third degree as defined in §130.66, inasmuch as
Jeffrey Epstein inserted a foreign object in the vagina of Plaintiff by
forcible compulsion.
100. Jane Doe 1 was also coercively trafficked to Jeffrey Epstein's friends
for commercial sex acts in this District.
101. Epstein used means of force, threats of force, fraud, coercion, abuse of
process, and a combination of such means to cause Jane Doe 1 to engage in
commercial sex acts.
102. Epstein recruited Jane Doe 1 to cause and force her to engage in
commercial sex acts in ways that were in and affecting interstate and foreign
27
EFTA00162147
Case 1:22-cv-10019-JSR Document 36 Filed 01/13/23 Page 28 of 130
commerce, including use of cell phones and means of interstate transportation (such
as aircraft that he owned or controlled).
103. Epstein transported Jane Doe 1 from New York to other states to cause
her to engage in commercial sex acts.
104. Jane Doe 1 wanted to escape from the Epstein sex-trafficking venture,
yet Epstein and his supporting team of co-conspirators increased the tactics of fraud,
force, or coercion to cause her to remain compliant in fulfilling Epstein's sexual
demands.
105. Jeffrey Epstein controlled Jane Doe 1 financially, emotionally, and
psychologically. He used his knowledge of Jane Doe 1's aspirations, fears, and
problems to manipulate her until she was completely controlled by and dependent
upon him.
106. When Epstein went to jail for sex offenses in Florida, he maintained
contact with Jane Doe 1. He and employees of his business entities, which were
created to support and legitimize Epstein's sexual abuse and sex-trafficking
enterprise, including HBRK, NES, Financial Trust, and Florida Science Foundation,
caused Jane Doe 1 to be transported to Florida to engage in commercial sex with
Epstein in his Florida residence while on so-called "work release" from jail, while
he was still wearing his ankle monitor.
107. There came a time when Epstein forced Jane Doe 1 to give massages to
28
EFTA00162148
Case 1:22-cv-10019-JSR Document 36 Filed 01/13/23 Page 29 of 130
certain of his powerful friends. During some of these massages Jane Doe 1 was
sexually abused, by force and against her will, by Epstein's friends whom she had
been required to massage. At least one of Epstein's friends used aggressive force in
his sexual assault of her and informed Jane Doe 1 that he had Epstein's permission
to do what he wanted to her. Out of fear, Jane Doe 1 has still not named this powerful
financial executive publicly.
108. Epstein and his co-conspirators withdrew large sums of cash from JP
Morgan to make cash payments to victims, including Jane Doe 1, in furtherance of
the sex-trafficking operation.
109. Jane Doe 1 was regularly paid cash by Epstein or one of his co-
conspirators that was withdrawn from one of Epstein's accounts at JP Morgan.
110. As alleged more fully below, JP Morgan knew that its accounts were
being used for Epstein's sex-trafficking venture based on a number of facts,
including but not limited to the identity of the individuals making the withdrawals
and wire transfers, the vast size of the withdrawals and transfers, the identity of the
recipients, the account opening activity, the pattern of the financial activity, the
personal relationship between Epstein and at least one high-ranking executive with
JP Morgan as detailed more thoroughly below, and Epstein's well-documented
criminal history and involvement in trafficking.
111. Over the ensuing years, Epstein threatened Jane Doe I in many ways
29
EFTA00162149
Case 1:22-cv-10019-JSR Document 36 Filed 01/13/23 Page 30 of 130
including threatening that if she did not abide by his demands, she would lose contact
with people she cared about and that those people would also suffer serious harm.
112. Epstein would alternate promises and threats to secure Jane Doe 1 's
compliance with his demands, including demands that she engage in commercial sex
acts with him and others. In some instances, Epstein would pay Jane Doe 1 directly
in cash obtained from JP Morgan for sex acts.
113. Epstein and his co-conspirators continued to coerce Jane Doe 1 in
various ways until her ultimate escape around the end of 2013.
114. Epstein and his co-conspirators continued to coerce Jane Doe 1 to
engage in commercial sex with Epstein, through the use of Epstein's force, fraud
(such as false promises, including the continued promise to assist Jane Doe l's sister
medically) and coercion (making it clear that if she did not abide then she would
suffer serious financial and reputational harm), through the end of 2013.
115. James "Jes" Staley ("Staley"), the then-head of JP Morgan's private
banking division, was a regular visitor of Epstein's during that period of time,
through and beyond 2013, and personally observed Jane Doe 1 as a sexual trafficking
and abuse victim at times including through his departure from JP Morgan in 2013.
C.
JP Morgan's Role in the Sex-Trafficking Venture
1. Banking laws and regulations exist to prevent funding of criminal ventures.
116. The Federal Bank Secrecy Act ("BSA") requires financial institutions
30
EFTA00162150
Case 1:22-cv-10019-JSR Document 36 Filed 01/13/23 Page 31 of 130
to have adequate anti-money laundering ("AML") policies and systems in place.
New York state law also requires financial institutions to devise and implement
systems reasonably designed to identify and report suspicious activity and block
transactions prohibited by law.
117. All regulated institutions are expected to configure systems based on
their unique risk factors, incorporating parameters such as institution size, presence
in high-risk jurisdictions, and the specific lines of business involved, and the
institutions have an affirmative duty to ensure that their systems run effectively.
118. In addition to having effective AML controls in place, it is also
necessary for financial institutions to monitor their customers for the purpose of
preventing their customers from facilitating criminal activity using the institutions'
facilities.
119. As part of preventing criminal activity, Know Your Customer ("KYC")
and customer due diligence are critically important, and financial institutions must
collect customer information at the time of establishing new relationships with
clients, including as necessary to assess the risks associated with the client. To
properly consider these risks, financial institutions must consider relevant factors
such as the nature of the client's business, the purpose of the client's accounts, and
the nature and duration of the relationship.
120. Financial institutions must also conduct KYC reviews for each client
31
EFTA00162151
Case 1:22-cv-10019-JSR Document 36 Filed 01/13/23 Page 32 of 130
relationship at intervals commensurate to the AML risks posed by the client,
including reviewing account activity to determine whether such activity fits with
what would have been expected given the nature of the account. Each client's AML
risk should also be re-assessed if material new information or unexpected account
activity is identified.
121. Financial institutions must also establish criteria for determining when
a client relationship poses too high of a risk and therefore must be terminated. A
financial institution may be liable under applicable laws if it maintains such a
relationship despite repeated indications of facilitation of improper transactions.
2. JP Morgan directly participated in Epstein's sex-trafficking venture.
122. With the encouragement of Staley, JP Morgan knowingly and
intentionally participated in the Epstein sex-trafficking venture by (among other
things) providing the financial underpinnings for Epstein to have ready and reliable
access to resources—including cash—to recruit, lure, coerce, and entice young
women and girls to cause them to engage in commercial sex acts and other
degradations.
123. In or about 1998, in furtherance of his rapidly growing sexual abuse
and sex trafficking operation, Epstein realized that he needed a reliable banking
institution that would provide the necessary legitimate appearance for his operation,
allow him to open many accounts for illegitimate companies, ignore red flags and
32
EFTA00162152
Case 1:22-cv-10019-JSR Document 36 Filed 01/13/23 Page 33 of 130
relevant state and federal banking laws, permit him to transfer money without
questioning, allow him access to abundant cash, and to otherwise knowingly
facilitate the commercial aspect of his commercial sex trafficking enterprise.
Epstein found all of those things in JP Morgan.
124. From about 1998 through 2013 (and following), JP Morgan knowingly
and intentionally participated in the Epstein sex-trafficking venture by (among other
things) providing the essential financial underpinnings for the venture. It also
financially benefited from that participation. There can be no doubt that JP
Morgan's conduct, as described below, was outrageous and intentional.
125. Around 2000, Epstein developed a key relationship to expanding
exploitative sexual abuse and his sex-trafficking operation when he began working
with Staley, the then-head of JP Morgan's private banking division.
126. Before meeting Staley, Epstein was a serial sexual abuser of young girls
and women, with an insatiable desire to sexually abuse females that were, in his
words, "the younger, the better."
127. Before Staley, Epstein relied heavily on the massive wealth bestowed
upon him primarily by one individual, Leslie (Les) Herbert Wexner ("Wexner"), to
give him the appearance of grand importance while relying on his then-madame,
Maxwell, to find and groom young women to be abused.
128. It has been reported that Wexner claims Epstein stole the money from
33
EFTA00162153
Case 1:22-cv-10019-JSR Document 36 Filed 01/13/23 Page 34 of 130
him. Nonetheless, the origin of Epstein's money was always a mystery, with Epstein
claiming to be a money manager to a stable of clients who entrusted him with a
minimum of $1 billion. JP Morgan knew that was a lie. Staley knew without any
doubt that Epstein was trafficking and abusing girls and that all of his staff, including
his main attorney and accountant, worked full time to conceal the illegal operation.
129. However, Epstein could not expand his operation to the level it
ultimately reached without a complicit financial banking institution that would
ignore red flags and assist him in paying hundreds of young females in wire transfers
and cash and allow him access to hundreds of thousands of dollars in cash to pay
hush money to his growing number of victims.
130. Staley was the key to making all of Epstein's depraved dreams of sexual
abuse and sex trafficking of countless young women possible. With his help, the
number of victims of the Epstein sex-trafficking operation began to grow on a
vertical trajectory beginning in and around 2000.
131. When Epstein and Staley first teamed up, in or around 2000, Staley was
the head of JP Morgan's private banking division and was later promoted to CEO of
JP Morgan Asset Management in 2001.
132. The relationship between Epstein and Staley was symbiotic and special.
Epstein agreed to bring many ultra-high wealth clients to JP Morgan, and in
exchange, Staley would use his clout within JP Morgan to make Epstein
34
EFTA00162154
Case 1:22-cv-10019-JSR Document 36 Filed 01/13/23 Page 35 of 130
untouchable.
133. Staley bragged within JP Morgan about Epstein's value to the bank and
used his position in the bank to silence any critics of the relationship between JP
Morgan and Epstein.
134. This meant that JP Morgan would keep Epstein on as a client at all
costs, including failing to act on any red flags and ultimately allowing him to run
and grow an operation designed to sexually abuse and traffic countless young girls
and women.
135. Once Epstein had JP Morgan (through Staley) in his pocket, Epstein
moved on to his next target, another known sexual abuser, Jean-Luc Brunel, a French
model scout who had suffered public disgrace for serial sexual abuse of young
females.
136. Epstein enlisted Brunel to recruit new victims from all over the world,
enticing them with promises of modeling careers before sexually abusing and
trafficking them through a modeling agency Epstein and Brunel established called
MC2.
137. In 2019, Brunel was arrested in France for sex trafficking related to his
relationship with Jeffrey Epstein and, like Epstein, was found hanging in his cell
from an apparent suicide.
138. There were several key figures who conspired and participated in
35
EFTA00162155
Case 1:22-cv-10019-JSR Document 36 Filed 01/13/23 Page 36 of 130
Epstein's international sex trafficking operation, most notably Ghislaine Maxwell,
Les Wexner, Jean Luc Brunel, and Jes Staley, acting through and on behalf of JP
Morgan.
139. In later years, Deutsche Bank swapped in for JP Morgan and provided
the necessary complicit financial institution for the operation, not coincidentally on-
boarding Epstein's trafficking operation through a former JP Morgan banker, Paul
Morris.
140. These co-conspirators were essential to Epstein's operation. Without
Maxwell, Epstein would never have been able to recruit his first victims and bring
them into his abusive lair. Maxwell approached young, vulnerable victims and
painted Epstein as an altruistic messiah who could help them. Once the girls were
in Epstein's clutches, Maxwell groomed them to make them feel comfortable being
sexually exploited and abused.
141. Without Brunel, Epstein would not have been able to expand his
international recruiting of young victims and, specifically, aspiring models he could
lure in with promises of opportunities.
142. Without Wexner, Epstein's sex-trafficking operation could never have
occurred to the extent that it did, as Epstein needed the appearance of extraordinary
wealth to attract his victims and force them to stay silent.
143. However, even with Wexner's funding of Epstein's operation,
36
EFTA00162156
Case 1:22-cv-10019-JSR Document 36 Filed 01/13/23 Page 37 of 130
Epstein's sexual abuse of hundreds of women would have been limited because the
money trail from Epstein's accounts to the many victims and recruiters would have
quickly exposed his illegal venture.
144. Therefore, Epstein could not risk having a typical banking relationship
where the bank might uncover something suspicious and report him to law
enforcement. The final essential ingredient Epstein needed to expand his sexual
abuse of young women and sex trafficking enterprise was therefore a financial
institution that would know—but not care—that Epstein was sexually abusing
women on a daily basis and paying out millions in hush money. Indeed, Epstein
needed an institution that would in fact assist and participate in that activity, and that
would support his enterprise and conceal it if he was ever caught.
145. JP Morgan provided the final component Epstein needed, and Staley
had a special relationship with Epstein and made sure Epstein and his illegal sexual
abuse organization were absolutely protected by the bank.
146. From the beginning of the Epstein/Staley relationship, Staley
understood that Epstein's money was only a part of the incentive to protect Epstein's
operation.
147. During the Palm Beach Police Department's 2005 investigation into
Epstein's sexual abuse of minor children, the detectives pulled message pads left by
Epstein's assistant from his trash as well as a search warrant executed at Epstein's
37
EFTA00162157
Case 1:22-cv-10019-JSR Document 36 Filed 01/13/23 Page 38 of 130
Palm Beach, Florida mansion.
148. According to those message pads, Staley was a frequent caller to
Epstein's Florida home throughout the course of Epstein's banking relationship with
JP Morgan.
.,, .
a
5:
Waft
(
TUE Aa
r
„
J
-9//
-- 5 /
414
,
or
/Z . /2 i 74-4.- 4:7 77 O
prOHEI
Kea E
TELD.HCOED
FUME CALL
WE. TO SEE YOU
VAN. CALL AGUE
woos TO LIE YOU
RUSH
RMI014O3 YOUII Cal
GPMAI AT ;mat
WISMIF
a
(ACT,
r
ora
mr,Lv 7 A,- S17
TELEPHONED
PLEASE CALL
CAME TO In YOU
M. CALL MAN
RUSH
MANED YOUNG/At
SPECIAL cranial
__L44.uvnic_v3 tnuy-
ton gal LP61.6111
Two
6 6 ip• I /O 4
our& • ti Pl.liat
„. Ti's STALE?
op S i i -
ni
'NTT 212 /4-4. 0110
,
TELEPHONED
MIL
CAME TO SEEYOU
1PLEASE
WISCALLMAIN
WANTS TO 9E YOU
RUM
RETWEE0 MEI CUL
SPEOALATTENTIEN
Lemma ' CAU.
ME '
SA02814
--I
as
WOMAN
IS
38
EFTA00162158
Case 1:22-cv-10019-JSR Document 36 Filed 01/13/23 Page 39 of 130
FoR iy4 kesipins
MA.
DATE
PAL
U ,
F F7 a/ATI:Ely
Of
LS
E Ai). 444 ()no
- F FM ONED
PLEASE CAM
CAME TO SEE YOU
WU. CALL AGAIN
L
T,
RUSH
SPECUL ATTEMUM
MESSAGE
te.3
SIGNED-.
,t:
TELEPHbED
PLEASE CALL
CAME TOM YOU
WILL CALLAGAIN
WAHT8 TD SEE YOU
RUSH
?CURVED YOUR CALL
SPESNL Ainpincv
149. On at least one occasion it appears Staley and Les Wexner called
Epstein together.
I IMPORTANLMESSApE I
FGA iiiii - vr--)TeW —
oat
me
PA
.
OF L E.,
oi,SES
RCM
•
COLS
1111PHOMD
REAM CALL
CAW TO a
YOU
WILL CALLAO* _ _
Tans 1010 YOU
RUM
AMMO TOR MU.
srecassmiral
MMEME
,
MOM
O2852
150. As long as Epstein's money stayed at JP Morgan, Staley also knew that
Wexner, Epstein's client who had turned over a power of attorney to Epstein, would
likewise keep his money with JP Morgan. Wexner's money was said to amount to
39
EFTA00162159
Case 1:22-cv-10019-JSR Document 36 Filed 01/13/23 Page 40 of 130
over a billion dollars.
151. Epstein made clear that Wexner was not the only JP Morgan client
whose allegiance to the bank Epstein controlled. Staley knew that Epstein "collected
people" and was close with many ultra-wealthy individuals that he could bring into
the bank, and Epstein did bring additional customers to the bank in exchange for JP
Morgan aiding and facilitating his international sex trafficking operation. These new
customers made JP Morgan even more profitable. Along the way, Epstein gave
credit for these new bank customers to Staley, which made Staley even more
powerful within JP Morgan.
152. Epstein controlled Staley like he did his many victims: by flaunting his
power and connections to the extremely wealthy. Epstein made it clear to Staley
that if JP Morgan ever decided to terminate its relationship with Epstein, the bank
would lose Wexner and the other wealthy connections Epstein had promised JP
Morgan.
153. Staley and Epstein's relationship grew closer as the years went on. In
fact, during the criminal investigation into Epstein in 2005, Staley flew on Epstein's
plane along with Sarah Kellen and Nadia Marcinkova, individuals who had bank
accounts through Epstein at JP Morgan and who were publicly identified as
Epstein's co-conspirators in trafficking offenses.
154. Rather than merely providing routine banking for Epstein, JP Morgan
40
EFTA00162160
Case 1:22-cv-10019-JSR Document 36 Filed 01/13/23 Page 41 of 130
went far beyond what a non-complicit bank would have done and instead assisted
Epstein in setting up the necessary financial structure to operate his sex-trafficking
venture.
155. Specifically, money was paid from Epstein affiliated JP Morgan
accounts to victims of trafficking and to known Epstein co-conspirators. Money was
also withdrawn from Epstein affiliated JP Morgan accounts in cash to pay victims
in furtherance of the sex trafficking operation.
156. JP Morgan also deliberately failed to follow routine banking practices
of review Epstein's accounts against the backdrop of the public information outing
him as a serial sex abuser and reporting Epstein for what was obviously a sex
trafficking operation he was running. JP Morgan, for example, purposely and
deliberately failed to timely file required Suspicious Activity Reports ("SARs") for
large cash and other suspicious activities of Epstein. In short, instead of providing
ordinary and routine banking, JP Morgan instead assisted Epstein in covering up his
past crimes and committing new ones.
157. Acting on behalf of JP Morgan, Staley assured Epstein that the two
were close friends and he would help Epstein and his operation in any way he could.
JP Morgan advised Epstein strategically about opening new accounts for additional
Epstein-related entities and assured him his cash needs would be satisfied—
permitting Epstein to continue to pay hush money to victims that could harm Epstein
41
EFTA00162161
Case 1:22-cv-10019-JSR Document 36 Filed 01/13/23 Page 42 of 130
in the criminal investigation.
158. JP Morgan chose not to cooperate with law enforcement and other
investigations into Epstein's sex trafficking, because it knew it would be exposed as
assisting in Epstein's scheme.
159. During a trip to the U.S. Virgin Islands in January 2007, Jane Doe 1
was repeatedly raped and coerced into commercial sex. She was paid $10,000 in
hush money, which Epstein's agents apparently withdrew from JP Morgan in cash.
Epstein told Jane Doe I he expected her to remain loyal to him and compliant,
making clear that if she did not, then she would suffer serious harm.
160. Epstein was one of the most coveted clients of JP Morgan because of
the financial benefits he provided to JP Morgan and its officers and employees,
including Staley. Through the years, Staley helped accumulate other protectors of
Epstein within JP Morgan.
161. The New York Times reported in 2019 that Mary C. Erdoes, one of JP
Morgan's highest-ranking executives intervened to keep Epstein as a client after he
pled guilty to sex crimes and was registered a sex offender.
162. With JP Morgan's complicity, Epstein was free to sexually abuse
hundreds of women, paying millions in hush money, without the fear of detection
by law enforcement. Epstein used the support of a reputable institution—JP
Morgan—to help cover up his sex-trafficking venture.
42
EFTA00162162
Case 1:22-cv-10019-JSR Document 36 Filed 01/13/23 Page 43 of 130
163. JP Morgan cared about profiting and showed absolute loyalty to
Epstein, including a willingness to violate banking laws, ignore multiple red flags of
criminality, and participate directly in sex trafficking to enable Epstein to fulfill his
abusive sexual appetite at the expense of countless vulnerable young women.
164. As Epstein's criminal sex trafficking venture expanded, he needed
more protection and support from JP Morgan. Through Staley and others, Epstein
became more deeply involved with JP Morgan, providing JP Morgan with more
financial benefits. And. as a quid pro quo, JP Morgan allowed Epstein to transfer
massive amounts of hush money to his victims and recruiters. JP Morgan allowed
Epstein to withdraw hundreds of thousands of dollars in cash so that all the payments
were not traceable (the most obvious red flag for any criminal enterprise).
165. As another example of JP Morgan and Staley's benefit from assisting
Epstein, a highly profitable deal for JP Morgan was the Highbridge acquisition.
166. In 2004, when Epstein's sex trafficking and abuse operation was
running at full speed, Epstein served up another big financial payday for JP Morgan.
167. Epstein was close friends with Glenn Dubin, the billionaire who ran
Highbridge Capital Management.
168. Through Epstein's connection, it has been reported that Staley arranged
for JP Morgan to buy a majority stake in Dubin's fund, which resulted in a sizeable
profit for JP Morgan. This arrangement was profitable for both Staley and JP
43
EFTA00162163
Case 1:22-cv-10019-JSR Document 36 Filed 01/13/23 Page 44 of 130
Morgan, further incentivizing JP Morgan to ignore the suspicious activity in
Epstein's accounts and to assist in his sex-trafficking venture.
169. For example, despite that Epstein was not FINRA-certified, Epstein
was paid more than $15 million for his role in the Highbridge/JP Morgan deal.
170. Moreover, Highbridge, a wholly-owned subsidiary of JP Morgan,
trafficked young women and girls on its own private jet from Florida to Epstein in
New York as late as 2012.
171. Staley and JP Morgan benefited from Epstein's sex-trafficking
operation because, in exchange for JP Morgan's knowing participation in that
operation, Epstein generated millions of dollars for JP Morgan, directly and
indirectly. Because Staley was generally in charge of Epstein's JP Morgan accounts,
he also benefited in the receipt of massages, private jet flights with victims or co-
conspirators of the operation, and other things of value.
172. Over many years, some JP Morgan executives lobbied within JP
Morgan to sever ties with Epstein due to the sex-trafficking allegations against him.
JP Morgan's leadership ignored their pleas and ultimately decided each time to keep
Epstein as a client. JP Morgan decided that, because it was receiving such large
monetary benefits from Epstein, it would continue participating in the Epstein sex-
trafficking venture by providing its financial infrastructure.
173. Epstein offered his business, and the many millions it generated,
44
EFTA00162164
Case 1:22-cv-10019-JSR Document 36 Filed 01/13/23 Page 45 of 130
exclusively to JP Morgan because in) Morgan was willing to knowingly aid Epstein's
sex trafficking operation and to help conceal it. JP Morgan knew that if it stopped
aiding and concealing the operation, it would lose Epstein's accounts and the
substantial financial benefits resulting from handling those accounts.
174. In addition to housing Epstein's accounts, JP Morgan also housed
accounts for numerous of Epstein's co-conspirators, including Epstein's main sex-
trafficking madame, Maxwell, who is now serving 20 years in prison for sex-
trafficking related to her participation in Epstein's operation.
175. In 2022, JP Morgan representative Patrick McHugh testified in
Maxwell's criminal sex-trafficking trial that between 1999 and 2007, Epstein
transferred approximately $31 million to Maxwell, an amount believed to be
payment for her role in Epstein's sex trafficking venture.
176. In addition to the necessary financial infrastructure provided by JP
Morgan, as late as 2012, a JP Morgan subsidiary company assisted with transporting
certain Epstein sex-trafficking victims by private jet from Florida to Epstein in New
York.
177. Ultimately, JP Morgan financially benefited by earning millions of
dollars for its participation in the Epstein sex-trafficking venture.
178. Throughout its relationship with Epstein, JP Morgan violated numerous
banking laws and regulations in order to conceal and continue its lucrative venture
45
EFTA00162165
Case 1:22-cv-10019-JSR Document 36 Filed 01/13/23 Page 46 of 130
facilitating the Epstein sexual abuse and sex-trafficking scheme.
179. For example, JP Morgan allowed Epstein and his agents to "structure"
cash withdrawals to further the sex-trafficking venture.
180. As another example, JP Morgan failed to file with the federal
government the required SARs that financial institutions must file with the Financial
Crimes Enforcement Network ("FinCEN") whenever there is a suspected case of
money laundering or fraud. Timely filing of these reports is required by the Bank
Secrecy Act and related laws and regulations. These reports are tools that the federal
government uses to detect and prosecute, among other illegal activities, sex
trafficking in violation of the TVPA. While JP Morgan was providing Epstein vast
sums of cash each year, it was required to timely file SARs about Epstein's
suspicious and unusual cash transactions.
181. JP Morgan's failure to timely file SARs about Epstein's sex-trafficking
venture, in spite of numerous red flags, was wrongful and purposeful.
182. A recent amended complaint filed by the government of the U.S. Virgin
Islands against JP Morgan in this Court describes some of the red flags JP Morgan
simply ignored:
Between 2003 and 2013, Epstein and/or his associates
used Epstein's accounts to make numerous payments to
individual women and related companies. Among the
recipients of these payments were numerous women with
Eastern European surnames who were publicly and
internally identified as Epstein recruiters and/or victims.
46
EFTA00162166
Case 1:22-cv-10019-JSR Document 36 Filed 01/13/23 Page 47 of 130
For example, Epstein paid more than $600,0000 to Jane
Doe 1, a woman who—according to news reports
contained in JP Morgan's due diligence reports—Epstein
purchased at the age of 14. Like other women who
received payments from Epstein, Jane Doe I listed
Epstein's apartments on 66th Street in New York City as
her address, which should have been a red flag to JP
Morgan.
Epstein and/or his associates also made significant cash
withdrawals and 95 foreign remittances with no known
payee. For example, Hyperion Air, Inc.—the Epstein-
controlled company that owned Epstein's private jet—
issued over $547,000 in checks payable to cash
purportedly for "fuel expenses when traveling to foreign
countries." Additionally, between January 2012 and June
2013, Hyperion converted more than $120,000 into
foreign currency. Many of these cash withdrawals either
exceeded the $10,000 reporting threshold or were
seemingly structured to avoid triggering the reporting
requirement. This is particularly significant since it is well
known that Epstein paid his victims in cash.
In addition, Epstein and/or his representatives appeared to
be misusing JP Morgan accounts for Epstein's purported
charitable
organizations,
including
the
C.O.U.Q.
Foundation and Enhanced Education. Epstein made
payments from these accounts with no clear nexus to the
organization's charitable purpose. For example, Epstein
and/or his representative used the C.O.U.Q. Foundation
account to pay $29,464.66 to three young women,
including two known victims, and over $20,000 to a
company called Phoenix Realty Home Inc.
Government of the United States Virgin Islands v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.,
Case No. 22-cv-10904-JSR, Amended Complaint (Dkt. 16) at 16-17 (S.D.N.Y.
47
EFTA00162167
Case 1:22-cv-10019-JSR Document 36 Filed 01/13/23 Page 48 of 130
Jan. 10, 2023).'
183. In taking the steps described above, JP Morgan obstructed, attempted
to obstruct, and interfered with the federal government's enforcement of the TVPA,
including the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida's criminal
investigation of Epstein in and around 2006 to 2008 and the U.S. Attorney's Office
for the Southern District of New York's criminal investigation leading to his
indictment in 2019.
184. Over the many years of the venture between JP Morgan and Epstein,
numerous JP Morgan executives, and several compliance officers, demanded that JP
Morgan sever ties with Epstein and his criminal organization due to the public sex-
trafficking allegations against Epstein. But JP Morgan's leaders and those in control
of those decisions were influenced by Staley to continue to support Epstein. Given
all the surrounding circumstances and Staley's knowledge, JP Morgan's decisions
to support Epstein were made with knowledge that he was operating a sex-trafficking
' Jane Doe 1 hereby adopts by reference the substantive factual allegations
regarding JP Morgan's participation in Epstein's sex-trafficking venture and
conspiracy found the U.S. Virgin Islands' (USVI) Amended Complaint against JP
Morgan into this Amended Complaint. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 10(c). A copy of that
amended complaint is attached to this complaint as Exhibit 1. With regard to issues
concerning the scope and duration of JP Morgan's participation in the venture and
conspiracy, as well as the nature of the venture and conspiracy, Jane Doe 1 relies on
her own complaint. Jane Doe 1 does not believe any of the substantive factual
allegations by the USVI are inconsistent with hers. But, if any inconsistency exists,
Jane Doe 1 relies solely on her allegations.
48
EFTA00162168
Case 1:22-cv-10019-JSR Document 36 Filed 01/13/23 Page 49 of 130
venture and conspiracy.
185.
In 2013, due to the overwhelming publicity about Epstein's illegal
sexual activities, and the departure of Staley from JP Morgan, JP Morgan realized
that its claims to not knowing what Epstein was doing were no longer facially
plausible. Accordingly, and reluctantly, JP Morgan stopped being Epstein's banker.
186. While JP Morgan stopped being Epstein's banker, it did not make a
clean break of things by disclosing its actions in support of the conspiracy to the
authorities. Nor did it communicate its abandonment of its conspiring with Epstein
and others in a manner reasonably calculated to reach Epstein's co-conspirators.
187. While JP Morgan stopped being Epstein's banker, it continued to take
subsequent actions to promote the venture and conspiracy.
For example, it
deliberately and willfully continued to fail to timely file SARs about the suspicious
activities it had seen. And it continued to recommend Epstein as good client to
others how inquired.
188. After losing Staley, Epstein no longer had his primary protector at JP
Morgan. In order to continue to operate, Epstein would need to find a new bank. As
alleged in greater detail in another complaint pending before this Court, Epstein
found that new bank to facilitate his sex trafficking venture—Deutsche Bank. See
Jane Doe 1 v. Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft et al., Case No. 22-cv-10018-JSR,
Amended Complaint (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 13, 2023).
49
EFTA00162169
Case 1:22-cv-10019-JSR Document 36 Filed 01/13/23 Page 50 of 130
3. JP Morgan's knew about Epstein's sex-trafficking venture and conspiracy.
189. As explained above, between (at least) 2000 and 2005, Epstein
provided clients to JP Morgan and, in exchange, JP Morgan allowed Epstein to do
as he pleased with his JP Morgan accounts. JP Morgan directly aided Epstein's sex
trafficking venture by allowing Epstein to engage in structuring violations and other
financial maneuvers required to maintain and conceal his criminal enterprise. JP
Morgan financially benefited from allowing Epstein to use his JP Morgan accounts
to run his sex trafficking venture.
190. However, in 2006, Epstein's relationship with JP Morgan hit a snag
when Epstein was publicly exposed for sexually abusing dozens of young women
and girls, several as young as 14 years old. There were hundreds of pages of police
reports and news articles revealing that Epstein was a serial sexual abuser and
trafficker, and that his operation depended on his accessing nearly unlimited cash to
use as payments to his victims.
191. With respect to the specific discoveries, the authorities found that some
of the victims "went to Mr. Epstein's house only once, some went there as much as
100 times or more."
192. It was publicly revealed in the investigation that Epstein was sexually
abusing three to four young females every single day of his life and that he was
paying each victim hundreds of dollars in hush money, usually in cash.
50
EFTA00162170
Case 1:22-cv-10019-JSR Document 36 Filed 01/13/23 Page 51 of 130
193. The criminal investigation also publicly revealed that Epstein was
paying countless recruiters to constantly bring him more victims, making clear that
quick access to cash at a financial institution was the lifeblood for his sex-trafficking
venture.
194. The money trail into Epstein's accounts was a dead giveaway that
Epstein was engaging in crimes and the recipients of his money exposed the type of
crimes.
195. At this point (and earlier), JP Morgan knew that Jeffrey Epstein was an
international sex trafficker. To the extent JP Morgan could publicly feign plausible
deniability before Epstein's arrest in 2006, thereafter its ability to play dumb
thereafter was eviscerated, as the details of his daily sexual abuse of young females
came to public light and when he ultimately was required to register as a sex
offender.
196. JP Morgan undoubtedly knew about Epstein's arrest in 2006.
197. Because Epstein was so publicly exposed as a sex trafficker and abuser,
one of his primary financial engines, Les Wexner, abandoned him and separated
himself from Epstein.
198. The federal criminal case against Epstein was under investigation from
(at least) 2006 through 2008, when Epstein eventually entered his guilty plea,
registered as a sex offender, and went to jail.
51
EFTA00162171
Case 1:22-cv-10019-JSR Document 36 Filed 01/13/23 Page 52 of 130
199. In the summer of 2008, Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement
("NPA") with the U.S. Department of Justice was made public when it was unsealed
in connection with a challenge to the NPA by two of his victims. Among other
things, the agreement outlined the possible federal sex offense charges that could
have resulted from the investigation, including TVPA charges.
200. Epstein's legal team also garnered significant publicity between 2006
and 2008, not only because of their well-known names but also the unusual number
of them. Epstein hired Roy Black, Ken Starr, Jay Lefkowitz, Guy Lewis, Michael
Tien, Lily Ann Sanchez, Gerald Lefcourt, Guy Fronstein, Jack Goldberger, and
more. All of these lawyers were now on Epstein's payroll and millions of dollars
were being shelled out to these attorneys from JP Morgan accounts to pay for his
legal defense of the most heinous of sexual abuse allegations. Not only was JP
Morgan (through Staley) well aware of the allegations, but JP Morgan (through
Staley) knew the identities of co-conspirators and many of the victims. Staley had
observed victims personally, and he was aware that Epstein was shelling out millions
of dollars to attorneys to take on these well-founded allegations.
201. In 2008, around the same time Epstein was pleading guilty to felony
sex offenses and registering as a lifetime sex offender, JP Morgan learned that
another of its high value clients, Bernie Madoff, was running the largest Ponzi-
scheme in modern history through his accounts at JP Morgan. This led to .n) Morgan
52
EFTA00162172
Case 1:22-cv-10019-JSR Document 36 Filed 01/13/23 Page 53 of 130
reviewing its clientele with the directive of severing ties with any problematic
customers.
202. With indisputable publicly available knowledge that Epstein was a
sexual offender who was using his wealth to run a sexual abuse and trafficking
operation, any responsible bank providing only routine banking support would have
cut ties with Epstein.
203. However, rather than cut ties with Epstein, Staley, acting on behalf of
JP Morgan and within the scope of his actual and apparent employment, personally
visited Epstein when he was serving his jail sentence in Florida and arranged for an
even tighter connection between JP Morgan and Epstein.
204. After Epstein was released from his Florida incarceration, he picked up
right where he left off—abusing young women on a daily basis, paying recruiters,
and paying hush money to victims. .n) Morgan continued its supporting actions as
well, continuing its role in Epstein's sex trafficking conspiracy and allowing it to
continue to flourish. Epstein continued abusing and trafficking with the same
frequency as he had been for years, and he could do so because he had a bank that,
even though it knew what he was doing, would not turn on him.
205. After Staley went to visit Epstein in Florida while Epstein was
incarcerated on sex offenses, Epstein and JP Morgan's relationship continued to
grow through Staley. Ultimately, after Epstein's release from jail, Staley and
53
EFTA00162173
Case 1:22-cv-10019-JSR Document 36 Filed 01/13/23 Page 54 of 130
Epstein spent significant time together at Epstein's townhouse in New York City.
Staley also visited Epstein on his private island in the United States Virgin Islands—
an island commonly dubbed "Pedophile Island." These visits were within the actual
and apparent scope of Staley's employment at JP Morgan.
206. Acting through Staley and to protect its financial benefits from dealing
with Epstein, JP Morgan made clear to Epstein that he could continue to fund his
sexual abuse operation through JP Morgan and it would continue to conceal the
illegal operation. JP Morgan and Epstein agreed, tacitly and otherwise, that Epstein
could continue to fund his sex-trafficking venture through JP Morgan and JP Morgan
would reap the financial benefits from its connection with Epstein.
207. After his arrest in 2008, dozens of public lawsuits were filed against
Epstein, revealing greater details of Epstein's sexual abuse of young women.
208. The lawsuits detailed millions in payments that Epstein was making to
recruiters, co-conspirators, cover-guys (such as his longtime fixer/lawyer and
fixer/accountant), and his victims.
209. Through the civil lawsuits, evidence (such as the previously referenced
message pads) taken from Epstein's trash by police or through prior search warrants,
as well as flight logs and black books began to publicly surface, shedding further
public light on the expansiveness of Epstein's sex-trafficking operation.
210. Through the lawsuits, other relevant information also became public
54
EFTA00162174
Case 1:22-cv-10019-JSR Document 36 Filed 01/13/23 Page 55 of 130
and was widely published: Epstein had no college degree, he had never obtained
any specialized license, none of the companies with whom he was associated had
any legitimate business structure or purpose, and he had no documented expertise
that would provide the requisite skill or knowledge to amass his vast wealth.
211. Epstein's victims' court challenge against Epstein's federal NPA also
continued between 2008 and 2013 (and beyond) and attracted significant media
attention. Indeed, between around 2006 and 2013, hundreds of press reports outlined
the allegations underlying the NPA and to varying degrees detailed the involvement
of Epstein's alleged co-conspirators, including Lesley Groff, Sarah Kellen, and
Nadia Marcinkova. Some articles reported that Kellen and Marcinkova had invoked
their Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination.
212. Additionally, press reports during this time noted allegations that
Epstein was involved with Eastern European women in particular and that a
modeling agency he helped develop with his friend and known sexual abuser, Jean
Luc Brunel, brought "young girls . . . often from Eastern Europe" to the U.S. on
Epstein's private jets.
213. At all times material hereto, JP Morgan was aware of the foregoing
information and more about Epstein's sex trafficking activities. When some
executives on the board at JP Morgan recommended cutting ties with Epstein, Staley
made strong and successful arguments, leading to JP Morgan keeping Epstein as a
55
EFTA00162175
Case 1:22-cv-10019-JSR Document 36 Filed 01/13/23 Page 56 of 130
customer.
214. In support of maintaining its relationship with Epstein, JP Morgan's
CEO of private banking, Mary Erdoes, argued that Epstein was too valuable of a
client to let go and played a pivotal role in maintaining the relationship.
215. Upon information and belief, internal documents also reflect JP
Morgan's knowledge of the extensive publicly available information about Epstein's
sex-trafficking scheme.
216. JP Morgan, including its CEO Jamie Dimon and the highest levels of
the bank, made the decision to monitor the public news being disseminated about
Epstein, knew that Epstein had been arrested for sexual offenses against young
women, knew that Epstein was a registered sex offender, knew that Epstein's co-
conspirators like Ghislaine Maxwell were involved in the sex trafficking operation,
knew that Epstein had paid to settle a number of civil lawsuits related to sexual abuse
of underage girls, and still made an intentional decision to keep Epstein on as a client.
217. JP Morgan, including its CEO Jamie Dimon and the highest levels of
the bank, knew of Jes Staley's personal involvement with Epstein and yet still
allowed Staley to remain a decision maker for JP Morgan on Epstein accounts.
218. Even before the sexual abuse investigation in Florida, media reports
raised questions about the facts that nobody knew how Epstein made his fortune nor
what he did to continue making the millions of dollars needed to support his life.
56
EFTA00162176
Case 1:22-cv-10019-JSR Document 36 Filed 01/13/23 Page 57 of 130
219. Media reports also appeared about Epstein's prior SEC violations in his
job at Bear Stearns arose.
A former business partner of Epstein's, Steven
Hoffenberg, even explained how Epstein assisted him in running a massive Ponzi
scheme that landed Hoffenberg in prison. JP Morgan was aware of these and other
reports.
220. Epstein, it was reported, claimed to be a financial bounty hunter and
money manager to those who would entrust him with $1 billion or more, yet JP
Morgan, with access to Epstein's accountants, knew Epstein's stated profession was
a lie.
221. Despite the false rumors he had created to conceal his true "business,"
Epstein was exposed as literally nothing other than a sex trafficker and abuser of
young females, a fact easily discernible by any responsible financial institution with
whom he was banking.
222. For JP Morgan, a sophisticated financial institution legally responsible
for complying with Know Your Customer laws and other banking obligations, the
details of Epstein's sexual abuse and trafficking were not a surprise. Even so, JP
Morgan never cooperated in any civil or criminal case against Epstein, because to
do so would reveal JP Morgan's complicity in Epstein's operation.
223. For example, in 2009, one of Jeffrey Epstein's sexual abuse victims
served a subpoena on JP Morgan in connection with a civil case. JP Morgan refused
57
EFTA00162177
Case 1:22-cv-10019-JSR Document 36 Filed 01/13/23 Page 58 of 130
to comply with the subpoena, making it abundantly clear whose side JP Morgan was
on.
224. JP Morgan never timely filed required SARs about Epstein's suspicious
transactions, including large cash transactions, which would have revealed to law
enforcement authorities the sex-trafficking venture.
225. Fearful that Epstein could turn on the bank for its participation in the
sex-trafficking venture, JP Morgan (and its agent, Staley) remained incentivized to
maintain and grow the relationship and to assist in concealing Epstein's suspicious
and illegal banking practices.
226. To be clear, during his years as a top executive at JP Morgan, Staley
was not only one of Epstein's closest pals, but more importantly, he was a frequent
visitor at Epstein's townhouse, including visiting the massage room; Staley met
many of Epstein's trafficking victims, including Jane Doe 1; Staley visited the
Epstein-owned victim stash house apartments at 301 East 66 Street, and Staley
personally observed the sexual abuse of young women, including Jane Doe 1. These
actions were within the scope of Staley's employment at JP Morgan.
227. Staley was well aware that Epstein was running a sex trafficking
venture, based on that facts that he: (1) went to Epstein's house in New York many
times; (2) personally spent time with young girls whom he met through Epstein on
several occasions; (3) personally visited young girls at Epstein's apartments located
58
EFTA00162178
Case 1:22-cv-10019-JSR Document 36 Filed 01/13/23 Page 59 of 130
at 301 East 66th Street; (4) personally visited Epstein on his island; (5) was frequently
calling and emailing with Epstein; (6) personally observed Epstein around young
girls, (7) personally observed Epstein sexually grab young women in front of him;
and (8) even visited Epstein in Florida while Epstein was serving his jail sentence.
All of these circumstances, and more, gave Staley direct and actual knowledge that
Epstein was engaged in sex-trafficking venture.
228. As a result of Staley's direct and actual knowledge of Epstein's sex-
trafficking venture, JP Morgan had direct and actual knowledge of Epstein's sex-
trafficking venture.
229. Due to Staley's knowledge, JP Morgan knew that Epstein had no job
and still helped open dozens of accounts for Epstein, allowing him to transfer money
with no underlying legitimate business operation.
230. Through Staley and other officers and employees, JP Morgan saw that
Epstein's JP Morgan accounts were almost exclusively used to pay for: (1) living
and travel expenses; (2) expenses related to apparent criminal activity; (3) lawyers
relating to his Florida criminal case; (4) lawyers defending civil lawsuits (including
paying for all of the witnesses' and co-conspirators' attorneys); (5) sex-abuse victim
settlements; (6) private investigators to investigate sex abuse victims; and (7)
extravagant lifestyles for his many co-conspirators.
231. Through Staley and other officers and employees, JP Morgan: (1) knew
59
EFTA00162179
Case 1:22-cv-10019-JSR Document 36 Filed 01/13/23 Page 60 of 130
that Epstein was always surrounded by young women and girls; (2) knew Epstein's
stated public profession of financial advisor was false; (3) knew Epstein had no real
expertise in business investing; (4) knew that his accounts, including many business
accounts, had underlying legitimate business activity; (4) saw Epstein's regular,
suspicious, and large cash withdrawals; (5) saw Epstein's frequent payments to
known co-conspirators; (6) knew that Epstein was funding a modeling agency with
Jean-Luc Brunel (an already exposed sexual abuser); (7) knew that Epstein was
making regular transfers in even, hundred-dollar increments; (8) knew that Epstein
was arrested in Florida and required to register as a sex-offender; (9) knew that
Epstein's co-conspirators had bank accounts at JP Morgan associated with his
accounts; and (10) knew that Epstein's madame, Ghislaine Maxwell, was paid
millions of dollars by Epstein.
232. JP Morgan had awareness of all the facts listed in the previous
paragraphs because, among other things, Staley, in the course his employment at JP
Morgan, regularly visited Epstein's home in Manhattan, Epstein's Island, and
Epstein's victim stash house on East 66th Street.
233. During a 2019 investigation by the UK Financial Conduct Authority
into Staley's relationship with Epstein, JP Morgan produced more than 1,200 emails
exchanged between Staley and Epstein between 2008 and the end of Staley's tenure
at JP Morgan. These emails were accessible to JP Morgan and written in Staley's
60
EFTA00162180
Case 1:22-cv-10019-JSR Document 36 Filed 01/13/23 Page 61 of 130
capacity as an officer and employee of JP Morgan. All of the information contained
in those emails is imputed to JP Morgan, including information about sexual and
related topics. These emails show, among other things, the close personal
relationship between Epstein and Staley, that Epstein and Staley communicated and
visited while Epstein was incarcerated, and that Staley visited Epstein's private
island on multiple occasions.
234. Despite knowledge of Epstein's illegal trafficking operation and the
fact that one of JP Morgan's top executives being so in bed with the operation, JP
Morgan continued to aid Epstein in his sex trafficking enterprise.
235. JP Morgan, through its agents and employees such as Staley, had direct
and specific knowledge that Epstein was operating a sex-trafficking venture and that
he needed extraordinary banking infastructure from JP Morgan to successfully
operate that illegal venture.
236. JP Morgan also knew that Sarah Kellen and Nadia Marcinkova, women
with Epstein-facilitated bank accounts at JP Morgan whom Staley knew well, were
involved in the trafficking.
237. Importantly, in January 2007, in the heart of the federal criminal
investigation, Epstein trafficked Jane Doe 1 to the U.S. Virgin Islands where she was
repeatedly raped. Not coincidentally, she was taken on Epstein's private jet—the
same one Staley traveled on—with Sarah Kellen and Nadia Marcinkova, the same
61
EFTA00162181
Case 1:22-cv-10019-JSR Document 36 Filed 01/13/23 Page 62 of 130
JP Morgan account-holding passengers Staley traveled with and who were identified
by the U.S. Government as Epstein's criminal co-conspirators.
238. JP Morgan also knew from the press that Epstein was a registered sex
offender who was always surrounded by young girls. Even so, JP Morgan conspired
with Epstein to assist him to operate the financial side of the sex-trafficking scheme.
239. JP Morgan knew, through Staley and other information, without any
doubt that Epstein was a serial abuser and that sex-trafficking was his everyday
lifestyle. JP Morgan also knew that without the bank's complicity, Epstein could
not pay for commercial sex acts, for co-conspirators, for his co-conspirators'
lawyers, for his own legal dream team, or for his private planes to traffic women to
his New York mansion and island to abuse.
240. Numerous of Epstein's co-conspirators had JP Morgan accounts tied to
Epstein accounts. During the time when Kellen and Marcinkova were publicly outed
as co-conspirators of Epstein's, they each had JP Morgan accounts that were noted
as Epstein-related accounts, putting JP Morgan on clear notice that the criminal
organization Epstein was running through the bank was an expansive one of sexual
abuse and trafficking.
241. MC2, the Epstein/Brunel modeling agency that was used to expand the
trafficking scheme internationally, was funded through JP Morgan loans on Epstein
accounts. This agency was started at a time when Brunel had already been publicly
62
EFTA00162182
Case 1:22-cv-10019-JSR Document 36 Filed 01/13/23 Page 63 of 130
ostracized from other known modeling agencies because he was a child sex abuser,
a fact which JP Morgan was aware.
242. All of Epstein's connections that were known to in) Morgan were either
very wealthy individuals, companies that had no verifiable legitimate purpose,
internationally known sex-abusing model scouts, publicly identified co-conspirators
in the Epstein sex trafficking operation the crimes of which were identified in a
public non-prosecution agreement, and young women and girls who could not
possibly have a legal and legitimate connection to Epstein. JP Morgan knew all of
this against the backdrop of their client—Epstein—having no professional expertise
or legitimate business with legitimate banking needs.
243. JP Morgan worked with Epstein to open new accounts in the name of
companies that had no plausible legitimate purpose, move money from one account
to another to mask payments to sexual abuse victims or co-conspirators, make wire
transfers to trafficking recruiters, and worked with Epstein's agents to make his sex
trafficking conspiracy less obvious to law enforcement authorities and others.
244. It is well known—and JP Morgan did know—that a large number of
cash transactions by a customer can be an indicator of criminal activity generally
and sex trafficking in particular, and JP Morgan knew Epstein was a sex trafficker
constantly needing access to large amounts of cash.
245. Payments to victims of sex trafficking are often made in cash to avoid
63
EFTA00162183
Case 1:22-cv-10019-JSR Document 36 Filed 01/13/23 Page 64 of 130
leaving a "paper trail" for law enforcement or other investigators to follow.
246. Forced sexual exploitation of victims has been estimated to generate
approximately $100 billion in yearly illicit profits, according to a recent study (2018)
by the Financial Action Task Force entitled "Financial Flows from Human
Trafficking."
247. Given the illegal nature of sex trafficking, individuals perpetrating the
crime, as well as laundering the proceeds of that crime, may be identifiable by
observing financial transactions and information obtained by financial institutions in
the course of conducting their customer due diligence and the behavior of offenders.
248. Sex trafficking organizations have the need for large amounts of cash
because many illegal transactions are often necessary to keep the organization
functioning. The techniques that financial institutions use to detect other criminal
enterprises using their accounts can also be employed to detect sex trafficking. For
example, sex trafficking organizations often use assets for money laundering (such
as cash, real estate, cars, etc.) that other criminal organizations use.
249. Sex trafficking organizations may also make cash deposits and
withdrawals below customer identification thresholds to avoid triggering additional
scrutiny or bank reporting requirements. Sex trafficking organizations may also use
multiple accounts to disguise the nature of their illegal transactions, thereby
"laundering" the funds involved.
64
EFTA00162184
Case 1:22-cv-10019-JSR Document 36 Filed 01/13/23 Page 65 of 130
250. One indicator of sex trafficking can be media coverage of an account
holder's activities relating to sex trafficking.
251. Another indicator of sex trafficking can be recurring payments for
transportation of logistics service in the late night or early morning. A similar
indicator can be significant payments for transportation or logistics (car rental, taxi,
and ride sharing service transactions).
4. Epstein used JP Morgan accounts for the sex-trafficking venture, and JP
Morgan knowingly and directly benefits from the venture.
252. Over the course of the relationship, Epstein and his representatives used
JP Morgan accounts to send dozens of wires, directly and indirectly, to co-
conspirators in the sex-trafficking venture.
253. Over the course of the relationship, Epstein and his representatives also
obtained vast sums of cash from JP Morgan to fund the sex-trafficking venture.
254. JP Morgan was aware that the recipients of some of these wire transfers
and cash described in the previous paragraphs were to Epstein's co-conspirators and
that the wire and cash transfers were in furtherance of the Epstein sex-trafficking
venture.
255. JP Morgan was aware that known co-conspirators of Epstein also had
JP Morgan accounts.
256. Epstein used JP Morgan accounts to pay, through wire transfers and in
cash, for coerced commercial sex acts by Jane Doe 1 and other Class Members.
65
EFTA00162185
Case 1:22-cv-10019-JSR Document 36 Filed 01/13/23 Page 66 of 130
257. Given JP Morgan's knowledge about Epstein's past sex trafficking, its
continuation of its financial relationship with Epstein was, at a minimum, in reckless
disregard of the fact that Epstein was using means of force, threats of force, fraud,
coercion (and a combination of such means) to cause Epstein's victims to engage in
comme